Skip to main content

I don't know why I'm surprised by this, but I am: the Romney organization really thought they were winning. Up until the anvil of reality called Colorado and Nevada came crashing down on them, they really thought they were winning. Evidently the Ohio freight train of reality was not enough. They needed more (and we were happy to supply it).

Follow me beyond the celtic knot of kossitude:

 

Karl Rove's tantrum last night on Fox about Fox calling Ohio for Obama was nothing new-- there's a guy with only a nodding acquaintance with the facts-- but the Romney campaign, which apparently had no data people with any ability at all, went along. Consider the facts: with 75% of the precincts counted in Ohio, Obama and Romney were roughly tied.

In situations like that, if you know nothing more, you can't figure out who will win. Maybe the rest of the voters are Obama voters, maybe Romney voters. But we knew, and the Romney campaign also should have known, which areas were still outstanding. As it turns out, and as the Obama campaign already knew, Romney got less than 44% of the remaining votes. When the networks called the election, Romney had no chance of winning, none. It was over. Oops.

But they actually believed they were winning! Anyone with a laptop and an Internet connection could figure out they were toast, and indeed many Kossacks did figure out they were crispy and getting burnt around the edges, but there they were, in their little reality-free bubble, unburdened, apparently, by anyone who could operate a spreadsheet, or indeed count to 270.

Look at this:

“We just didn’t see the enthusiasm with their base,” he added. “We had enthusiasm on our side. So we thought, ‘Yeah, we’re gonna win this.’ … We hit our numbers in rural areas. When Fox called it, we still thought we had a chance based on what we could figure was in and what was still out.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/...

They hit their numbers! Booyah. Apparently they didn't pause to see if the other guy hit his numbers too. Evidently they forgot the other side had a GOTV plan too. I'm just stunned by their complete lack of logic, math and rational thought. These guys were supposed to be the cold, calculating business folks, looking unemotionally at the facts. But not.

All along, they had the delusional belief that they were winning.  I thought they were lying, but they were just incompetent beyond belief. This is basic, simple data science for campaigns. Where was the Romney business expertise? Did they not use computers and data at Bain when he was there? Did Bain just make up numbers and pretend they were true? Unbelievable.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site