Skip to main content

Winner-take-all American elections produce stark choices for voters and activists. You can have plenty of disagreements with a candidate on policies and still support them passionately because the alternative is so stunningly bad. The closer the election gets, the more the differences with your favorite candidate tend to get muted, because election choices are not about nuance.

Once the election is over, though, the policy debates within a political party come back to center stage. The debates we are beginning to engage in within the Democratic party right now will be partly around ideology, of course, as populist progressives and more Wall Street oriented Third Way Democrats duke it out. But the debates will also play out on another level as our party's optimists and pessimists begin engaging each other in earnest. Being optimistic or pessimistic isn't just about people's respective moods, or about making predictions. It has serious policy implications as well.

The optimists are the official party line. The Obama campaign message, Bill Clinton in his famous Democratic convention speech, and party spokespeople have been sending the message that in spite of the tough times we've had, things are going to get steadily better, that the foundation has been set for real prosperity. And I know from my conversations with administration economic policy people that they really believe it. One senior White House NEC official told me in the weeks before the election that his biggest political nightmare was Romney getting elected and then getting credit for the recovery that is soon arriving.

I sure do hope these optimists are right, it would be such a great thing to see. But there is another group of economic policy people that I know who are a lot less sanguine. They believe that the housing bubble that led to the financial collapse of 2008, the enormous and still mostly unchecked power of the biggest banks to distort and manipulate markets, and the complete mismanagement of economic policy in the Bush years have created long term structural damage different and far deeper than in past recessions. They fear that Europe is still a ticking time bomb, and that the problem of housing debt caused by the bubble's collapse is still a major drag on our economy. They believe that we have just gone through the first five years of a lost decade comparable to the Japan lost decade of the '90s (which Japan's economy still hasn't recovered from). And they worry that the austerity economics slowing Europe's economy to a crawl, the same policies the politicians here seem determined to head toward, will only make things worst.

The policy implications of this are huge. If you are an optimist, your tendency is to believe that no big new initiatives are needed, that we are on the right course and mostly need to avoid doing anything to screw things up. That doesn't mean there still aren't some tweaks needed here or there, some modest new policy innovations you want to tinker with, but it makes you far more reluctant to be bold or invest a lot of political capital in big new ideas. On the other hand, if you fear that we are smack in the middle of a lost decade, that the structural damage from the bubble and collapse are too deep for this to be just a little bit deeper recession than usual, you are more likely to push for major new ideas.

I am normally a more optimistic person, but in this case I tend to be more in the pessimists' camp. Partly that's because I view the world through the lens of the working class neighborhood I grew up in, and the lower income folks I cut my teeth organizing for when I was getting started in politics. The working middle class has been through hell the last 5 years, and outside of my friends in the auto industry, they have yet to see a lot of the benefits of what recovery we have been seeing. I firmly believe in bottom-up economics, that the engine of a strong economy is a growing and prosperous middle class, and I have yet to see that middle class make great gains. A side note here from the exit polls that I think is telling: 37% of Americans, overwhelmingly from the middle class, think inflation is the number one economic problem today. This is in spite of the fact that the overall inflation numbers have stayed low the last 4 years. The reason? Working and middle class folks have had wages that are flat or worse in recent years, while the prices that matter the most for them- gasoline, groceries, health care, college tuition- have continued to skyrocket. That's what they call middle class squeeze, and it's why Mitt Romney came close in this election despite having an economic platform and a you're-on-your-own values system that middle class voters thought was awful.

If the middle class engine isn't purring, the economic road to recovery will be bumpy at best. We need to do some big things to rebuild this economy for the long term. Policy makers need to take a look at bigger, bolder ideas like this Shared Prosperity plan. And knowing that the Republican house won't be likely to go along with things like that, the President needs to (a) not agree to job-killing Republican austerity demands, and; (b) be prepared to take bigger and bolder executive action. Example include signing executive orders on procurement and purchasing that force employers doing business with the federal government to pay better wages and benefits, and aggressively pushing bankers and Fannie/Freddie on mortgage writedowns.

Here's the other thing the President needs to think about: counting, as he has in the past, on the rosier economic scenario to come true has dangerous political implications. An economic slowdown and low growth rate over the next couple of years, whether because of Europe or anything else, is political danger at it's highest level after a campaign of emphasizing that everything was on the right track and moving forward. If you don't take any big steps and/or agree to the austerity the Republicans are pushing, you are making a very dangerous bet: the 2010 election might look good in comparison.  

I sincerely hope my friends in the White House are right about the economy finally being on the right track. It would be a joy to see the country getting moving again. But the President needs to not assume the best, not be complacent in case that scenario turns bad. Revving up our middle class engine is long overdue.    

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  93 percent of all productivity gains now (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    nchristine, kck

    goes to about 1 percent of tge population.

    Um.  That's a problem, and no one is addressing it.

  •  shared prosperity plan (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I agree with your ideas. And you have friends at the Whitehouse. I hope they listen to you. That said, I clicked on the link. I checked out the overview and the executive summary. My immediate questions: who is this written for? and is someone really getting paid to write this? If you were to boil down what it is trying to say, could you not say it better?

    There is work to be done. Lets get to it.

    Oh yeah? Like what?

    Buildings in every big city need work to use less heat and less air conditioning.
    And every big city has inner city land that is poisoned; return it to health and put it back to use. Look at what Pittsburgh has done. So there's two.

    And while we are at it, we need to pay the people who do the work what they are worth.

    Words like these are not the same as the linked materials--I do not have any answer--I will not even claim that they are better--just different to make my question on whether the materials are the best that they could be--but I do not have to have a complete best answer just to make a point that the materials as written could be improved.

    Again, good luck on someone, anyone, listenting at the WH.

  •  Both right (0+ / 0-)

    The economy is recovering and will continue to do so, and unemployment will steadily decline.  However, there's enough structural damage that we may never get back to the days of 4% unemployment.  Somewhere around six percent will be the new normal.

    History will be kind to us because we will write it.

    by Sky Net on Sat Nov 10, 2012 at 02:56:44 PM PST

  •  Ditto on Both Right (0+ / 0-)

    Your summary is good but does not seem to address the current realities of globalization and the unavoidable and nw integral impacts of globalization on the nation and policy for Americans. I hope you dig in and write more on this.

    Strategic outlooks for decades have well predicted the turbulence we see today from globalization and now add on the debt, credit, and banking crises and the disparity of wealth, and the fact that while solutions are many and thoroughly achievable it remains unreasonable to expect our government to act (is that pessimism or realism?). Business has embraced globalism, education is embracing it, but our culture and gov't have not.

    The enormous multinational business sector will never revert back to the industrial era labor-management paradigms of old no matter what new manufacturing starts up or green energy. The "long hard slog" is optimism, as good as it gets (i.e., thus far averting the not-if-but-when next financial crisis) , and will take another 10 years But it is a slog forward. Yet policy discussion never address what will be "done with" the 5%? 10% 15% of Americans who are not included in the current and future economy. Those people left behind, patriots, and the virtuous are not being pessimistic to insist on such inclusion in debates. Progress is underway but it must be managed gracefully. Government must function and policy must adapt yet there are no plans or ideas mentioned much less underway.  

    Let all Bush tax cuts expire and , bring on the Sequestration cuts to defense.

    by kck on Sat Nov 10, 2012 at 03:49:43 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site