Skip to main content

Some reflections of a political junkie.

1.  Non-partisan redistricting and its effects.   The pattern is not completely clear.  In Iowa, which went from 5 to 4 seats, the Democrats went from a 3-2 majority to a 2-2 tie in a state Obama won by more than 5%.    On the other hand, in AZ, which added a seat, and in which the Governor tried to mess with the results of the non-partisan redistricting effort, the Dems went from 3-5 to an apparent 5-3 (assuming Ron Barber holds on to his lead) in a state Obama lost by 10%.  On the other hand, nationally Dems drew half a million more votes for the House than did the Republicans yet failed to take control of the chamber in large part because of gerrymandering.  This can be seen in states like OH and PA, which Obama won, but in which Republicans maintained large leads in the delegation.     I do not think the answer is for our side to gerrymander in return, although with the Texas precedent we could now do that in MN and CO and gain a few seats in time for the next election.   The country would be better served with districts that are more compact and do a better job of recognizing subsidiary political boundaries (cities, towns, counties) and having the parties compete more vigorously.

2.  Given the gerrymandered districts, moves like that of Ohio Secretary of State Husted to change that state's selection of electors to be like NE and ME, by Congressional district, will be tempting for Republicans to do before the next presidential cycle.  Opposed to this will be National Popular Vote initiative.   As a political junkie I have problems with both.  On national popular vote, remember that when Romney had leads in some national polls, it was because of an overwhelming advantage in the South while losing the the other 3 regions.  At least for now the electoral college requires a candidate to appeal across the country to win nationally.  I would have less problem with CD voting were the districts not gerrymandered, but remain something of a fan of the electoral college approach because of the clarity it provides.

Please keep reading.

3.  The importance of elections other than those for federal office.   The real damage of the 2010 cycle was not the loss of the House, as bad as that was, but the loss of governors' offices and state legislatures.  This lead to the gerrymandering that allowed the Republicans to control the House.  It also led to the attempts to suppress the vote of Democratic constituencies.  We need to pay closer attention, even in odd numbered years like next, when Virginia and NJ elect governors, VA elects  two other statewide officers and its House of Delegates; and New Jersey elects its entire legislature.  

4.  It is likely that the current Supreme Court will find the relevant portions of the Voting Rights Act no longer constitutional by a 5-4 vote, which will thus encourage legislatures still in Republican control in the South to continue to attempt to disenfranchise Democratic leaning constituencies -  those in the North were already unconstrained for the most part by the VRA.  Given Republican control of the House it is unlikely that new legislation or even a constitutional amendment to have a more standardized approach to elections for federal office could be enacted in time for the 2016 election, unless Democrats were able to gain control of the House in 2014.  Here I think the issue should be raised and the Senate should act to create a public issue, because there are long-term demographic connections that can really challenge Republicans who choose to try to suppress votes.  

5.  That the American people have spoken fairly clearly in both their votes and their expressions in polling data on certain issues, such as raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations, does not mean that the "wise men" of the "Village" will listen.  As wrong as many of them were on the outcome of the election, they are likely to continue to frame things in a way that favors a particular narrative even if that narrative is inaccurate -  thus we get endless repetitions of "the fiscal cliff" when in fact there is no cliff.  It is not yet clear to me how best we can push back against this.

6.  We are in a moment of possible major cultural warfare.  We are seeing this from Catholic Bishops, we are seeing it in dead-enders raising issues of secession, we are seeing it in threats of violence.  And yet, despite such clouds on the horizon, there were major pushbacks by voters in surprising ways.  Not only did marriage equality and marijuana legalization triumph on the ballot, in at a least a few cases the attempted corporatization of public services failed -  Jeb Bush's attempt to to amend the Florida Constitution so that tax dollars could flow to religious schools was soundly rejected.  

7.  Do not assume that large amounts of money unleashed by Citizens United did not have an effect.  First, it ensured the nomination of Mitt Romney.  Second, last minute infusions had effects down ballot, starting with the AZ Senate race with millions of attack ads dumped in against Carmona to defeat him.  Of equal importance was the impact upon some initiatives flying somewhat under the radar:  In Washington State the legislature had consistently rejected charter schools, so the big money boys funded an initiative to authorize them.   As the big money funders begin to understand how to better target their expenditures, we might start seeing more and more of this.

8.  Ground game, technology, and information made a huge difference in the Presidential election.  But for Obama to have a successful second term he must use all of them in generating support for his agenda, and in the forthcoming elections at state and local levels and for the Congressional cycle in two years.   Currently the Dems have something of an advantage, but if not used it will disappear.

The campaign is now largely over - yes, there are some recount battles.  

Now comes the other part of politics - governing.

As we were involved in the campaigns for office, we need to stay involved in the campaigns for policy.

As a political junkie, there is always something to keep my attention.

What about you?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (16+ / 0-)

    "We didn't set out to save the world; we set out to wonder how other people are doing and to reflect on how our actions affect other people's hearts." - Pema Chodron

    by teacherken on Wed Nov 14, 2012 at 04:27:37 AM PST

  •  you may be right about (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    brae70, Munchkn, a2nite

    the s.Ct.  Roberts tried to kill the VRA when he was part of the Reagan admin.  James Crowe is coming back with a vengeance because Rs see blacks and Latinos as the reason they lost.  We will need a new nationwide civil rights movement.

    I'm glad Barack Obama is our President.

    by TomP on Wed Nov 14, 2012 at 04:52:41 AM PST

  •  I think we have to stop looking at victims (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    badscience, Brian1066, Icicle68, a2nite

    and pay attention to the perpetrators of political injustices. Legislators across the nation have been allowed to persist in the belief that their job is to act as secular enforcers of right behavior, whenever the religious institutions fail to persuade the citizenry to impose sufficient deprivations of rights (speech, association, recreation, perambulation, governance) and sustenance (food, shelter, education) on themselves.
    All men are not created evil, as some would have us believe in order to justify their impulse to be punitive. On the other hand, public officials are created to serve, not rule. Just because Jesus of Nazareth eschewed the establishment of a kingdom on earth, it does not follow that a secular tyranny is there for the taking.
    Indeed, the Constitution was specifically designed to limit the powers which public officials might be inclined to usurp in preference to actually carrying out the obligations and duties of their offices -- to manage public assets and resources for the general good. Of course, providing for the general welfare implies work. Which is, undoubtedly, why just giving orders tends to be preferred, especially by individuals whose practical talents, other than the gift of gab, are few.
    Incompetents ought not to be elected to public office. Charles Blow claims to have discovered incompetence during the current election season. But, Barack Obama already identified it last time around. It was probably one of his most irksome observations about Republicans.

    Finally, gerrymandering ought to be universally offensive because it is really not her other than legislated segregation -- an effort to set up jurisdictions that can be pitted against each other for the benefit of politicians.

    We organize governments to provide benefits and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Wed Nov 14, 2012 at 05:05:01 AM PST

    •  Incompetance seems to be the major characteristic (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Of the rotten Rs. Their voters like them this way.

      The radical Republican party is the party of oppression, fear, loathing and above all more money and power for the people who robbed us.

      by a2nite on Wed Nov 14, 2012 at 08:01:42 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  I don't think it'll be 5-4 against VRA (0+ / 0-)

    I think Roberts may actually swing for in this one. Something tells me he is thinking about his legacy and sees the writing on the wall with regards to direction of the nation.

    I also think that we may not have any retiree justices and that they will try to hold on as long as they can in hopes the GOP wins 2016.

    --Enlighten the people, generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like spirits at the dawn of day. - Thomas Jefferson--

    by idbecrazyif on Wed Nov 14, 2012 at 05:37:18 AM PST

  •  Damn right (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    we need to take back Ohio from the Rethuglicans.  I had to sit through Taft, we finally got Strickland, and then we got stuck with Kasich who is just a terrible, terrible human being.  That, and rumor has it that since he came into the governor's office he has suggested they do things but his staff has had to tell them they are illegal.  Oh, to be a fly on the wall in there.  And Hustead made a name for himself as another triple-A asshole.  And we have Mandel who he and his friends are unfit to be Treasurer.

    I can't wait to oust these jackasses.

  •  What Silvia said; the R's in OH are really rotten; (0+ / 0-)

    they have to go.

    tipped and rec'ed Ken

    The radical Republican party is the party of oppression, fear, loathing and above all more money and power for the people who robbed us.

    by a2nite on Wed Nov 14, 2012 at 07:53:00 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site