Skip to main content

News reports from a variety of places, and my own personal report-backs from participants at yesterday’s progressive organization leaders meeting at the White House, indicate that the President is signaling loudly that he will stand strong on at least some of the very highest priority things that progressives care the most about in the fiscal showdown talks. He continues to demand that the Bush tax cuts for those making over $250,000 go up, he said yesterday in the progressives meeting that Social Security was “off the table”, and he said that while he believes there can be Medicare and Medicaid savings from a variety of administrative methods, that he had no intention of cutting benefits. We don’t know how all of this is going to end up, but right now at least, the President has decided that in unity there is strength.

This doesn't come as a big surprise to me. In a conversation a couple of months back with a senior White House official, we were talking about the fiscal showdown politics, and I was emphasizing that there would be a serious civil war in the Democratic party if Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid were cut- that our side wasn't going to back down on this fight. His response was that the Obama team had learned from the past that the administration was in a far stronger position if they were unified with progressives, that they felt that was when they had gotten things done and had been in stronger political shape than when they had tried to triangulate things.

Now before you get too excited about that statement or take it as gospel, keep in mind something I learned early when I worked in the Clinton White House: there is no one White House political strategy or philosophy about how to do things. There are a lot of different players in a White House, and almost always several different views on how to get things done or play things out. I’m sure there are still people in that building who think it is smart politics to pick fights with the base, or who wish the “professional left” would just go away. But I do believe that there is a clear trend in the White House toward thinking it is better for Democrats to be unified in policy fights with the Republicans, simply because they keep getting rewarded politically when they are.

Look at some of the big political decisions this White House has made in the second half of the first term. When it came to prioritizing the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and endorsing marriage equality, there were advisers that argued against those actions because of how it might hurt with swing voters; same with the decision to stop deporting the DREAM Act young people. When Obama decided to put out his own deficit reduction budget proposal last fall, there were Democrats strongly urging that in include cuts in Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits as a good will gesture to the Republicans and to show the President was “centrist”; when the President was getting ready to unveil a major new jobs initiative, there were advisers, worried it would look too government-oriented, who urged it be scaled back; when the President took a turn toward middle class populism with the Osawatomie speech, Third Way Democrats cringed, and from what I hear it might have been the final nail in the coffin for Bill Daley as White House Chief of Staff, as he was uncomfortable with the approach, fearing it would drive away business support.

In all of these cases, though, the president was rewarded for these decisions. The LGBT community, after being unhappy with him earlier, rallied behind Obama with support and money more than any other President in history. Fired up by the DREAM decision, Latinos turned out in bigger numbers and voted for the President in bigger numbers than in 2008. And the President’s populist approach on economics and message paid off big time in both firing up the President’s base and winning over working class swing voters.

We don’t know how this fiscal showdown is going to play out. Progressives have to fight with all their strength against any deal, supported by the President or not, that cuts Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits and doesn't hold the line on repealing the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. But the President seems to be understanding more and more that in unity with his progressive base, there truly is strength.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I sure hope so. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    agnostic, Supavash

    Unity worked well last week.

  •  In Strength, there is unity. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Fleet

    Something that President Obama clearly recognized at the end of 2011 and throughout this campaign.

    Let's just hope that he continues in the same vein. Aorta apologize for any  pulmonary pun-nushmen in advance.

    What we call god is merely a living creature with superior technology & understanding. If their fragile egos demand prayer, they lose that superiority.

    by agnostic on Wed Nov 14, 2012 at 08:40:49 AM PST

  •  One issue at a time, not ! (0+ / 0-)

    Everybody has an issue they are trying to protect, even after basic economic and health concerns.  It could be environment, any number of civil rights, anti-war, election reform.

    Without progressive ideals, these issues do not rise to conscious living.   Without solidarity, issues will be lost.

    The President, the DNC as well as future Democratic candidates at all levels need to in the public eye one way or another for all issues.    One issue at a time is regressive.

    The big news now are fiscal cliff and the General Patreus affairs.   There are more issues.   Let's keep the pressure on.  Let's keep the unity.

  •  Thanks Mike (0+ / 0-)

    Glad to see you're posting here. Missed Open Left this cycle.

  •  what (0+ / 0-)

    What happens to unspent military appropriations?  Does the president have the power to defer, or cancel, projects approved by Congress?  As a "lame duck" leader, he needn't be lame.  Using this threat at closed door meetings might give him arm twisting power--and word about this might make some R backers back off.

    Apres Bush, le deluge.

    by melvynny on Wed Nov 14, 2012 at 10:48:46 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site