Mawreen Dowd wrote an article in the NYT today on Susan Rice and the Libya/Benghazi controversy. Here it is:
From the link above:
Rice was given the toned-down talking points, but she has access to classified information.
Also, from the same article:
Excellent article. I think Obama has much better choices for Secretary of the State than Susan Rice.
His argument (the President's) that Rice “had nothing to do with Benghazi,” raises the question: Then why was she the point person?