Skip to main content

Libya and Lebanon present a microcosm and a mesocosm for military actions in the Middle East. Libya and Lebanon scale close together, for a "Lessons Learned" exercise, plus the both of them involve militias. Best of it, you get a head-to-head comparison of Ronald Reagan with Barack Obama. Here's the head counts:

63 -- victims at the embassy 18-April-1983
241 - victims at the Marine barracks 23-October-1983
58 -- victims at the French barracks 23-October-1983
30 -- victims at Tyre for the Israelis 3-November-1983

392 total

Going up against Arab irregulars was a new problem in the 1980s. By the time Obama gets to the problem in Libya, supporting dictators has faded. With Libya you get to almost an exact opposite to Reagan's suicide-bombing disaster and the follow-on full blown "cut and run" surrender.

Plainly, Iraq is in the macrocosm class for military adventures. The medical statistic Total Extra Deaths, collected for Iraq, tops out at 1,400,000 lives. This tells us that Iraq was a different war altogether. It was an example of "Empire Heavy." It was a smaller version of Vietnam.

Reagan was president when the Marine barracks for Beirut was destroyed in 1983. His policies had made enemies among Arabs and Persians, Sunni and Shiite. Nobody over there had much reason to like us, including Likudnik Israelis. You would never know it.

What stands out, researching Libya and Lebanon, is the extent to which media and Internet coverage are dominated today by American conservatives and how much they are still head over heals in love with Ronald Reagan.

Conservatives love this man so much that their hounds in corporate media rewrite history and simplify stories to match their fantasies. Sheer bloodiness by Americans and their favored dictators has no part in their timeline. The hounds lie about Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982, about our ally Saddam Hussein and the Iran-Iraq war, about the Muslim religion and about Muslims generally. The one identifiable product is confusion.

This is no way to inform "We the People" in a democracy.

Lebanon is reflected with one phrase: "They Came In Peace." Arrive as United Nations Peacekeepers, sure thing. But then, contrary to today's conservatives, Reagan approved unloading with this:

USS New Jersey fired as many as 300 "flying Volkswagen" 16-inchers a day. 2700-pound artillery rounds. 500-meter casualty radius. Smoked one village after another.

April 18, 1983. The American ambassador, Robert Dillard, had opposed Israel's invasion in 1982, objecting that Arafat and Fatah were not a serious threat. The embassy in Beirut was half-destroyed by a 1-ton thermobaric truck bomb. 63 victims.

You will not hear that it took six months for Reagan's White House, his area manager Robert McFarlane, the military brass, and the analytical teams at CIA/DoD to forget the embassy bombing. The Marine barracks was undefended.

October 23rd. A 20-ton truck bomb annihilated the Marine barracks. Same day and then 10 days later, our allies the French and then the Israelis down in Tyre were hit with similar PETN-and-liquid-butane truck bombs. Between these three large-scale attacks, loss of life came to another 329 people. The barracks building:

Pancaked to this:

Now this:

Threat-anticipation had gone out of style.

President Reagan's response is a classic combination of unconscious racial hatred and ignorance:

"But I think we should all recognize that these deeds make so evident the bestial nature of those who would assume power if they could have their way and drive us out of that area; that we must be more determined than ever that they cannot take over that vital and strategic area of the Earth, or for that matter, any other part of the Earth."

-- October 23, 1983

A battleship is Peacekeeping; truck bombs are barbaric. His National Security Council had wanted to 'teach a lesson" to the Arab Lebanese. A couple of them, including McFarlane, got promotions.

Today conservatives blame Iran and (I kid you not...) Hezbollah. Rational Western analysis gets tossed in the laps of straw dog Libruls "who favor compromise with militants who seek a worldwide Islamic caliphate and the imposition of a strict Islamic order on their fellow Muslim and non-Muslim citizens." That's the benighted Judith Miller at City Journal.

Hezbollah did not exist until 1985. Apparently not one of the righties' Senators or Congressmen, pundits, WSJ writers, et.al. know that.

How's this: Iran and the Hezzies are Shiite. They oppose any and all notions of a Caliphate.

Also, in 1983, Reagan was backing Saddam Hussein with billions of dollars in weapons for his war with Iran. Why would Iran not have killed a few Americans? They were at war with us. They deserve revenge as much as anybody.

America and the other countries stuck in Ariel Sharon's 1982-1984 "tar pit" paid blood for the experience. We should to try to learn something. Busting up righties is not as important. They make cartoons of themselves.

Won't hurt any of you, to know a little more about what you're talking about.

Promise you, this narrative will return to Libya. To Obama. We will get to two or three points we think deserve a priority, assuming you follow below le chignon d'orange.

History Disappears

We have our own "Ministry of Truth" here at DKOS. He's one guy, he breaths. He doesn't do much of the type of work that The Party in "1984" did, rewriting historical records to fit the demands of Big Brother.

Our "MoT" does not alter an Inaugural Address. Certainly not the one from January 20, 1981.

"They're in the air!" has disappeared. As by magic! The Reagan Library has altered its transcript of Ronnie's inaugural address of January 20, 1981. That was the very first announcement to America that the Iran embassy hostages had been released. It got huge applause from the crowd.

It has disappeared... because that was the fundamental deal underlying the Iran-Contra scandal -- lots of money and a few missiles to Iran to assure that the hostages were not released until Jimmy Carter left the White House.

For people who "change history" on an Inaugural Address, tampering with public information on an old war is small change.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Corporate media entities obliterate basic History 101 facts of the last hundred years. Citizens who rely on television and print for their information should know what they are missing.

This does not exist:

-- The American embassy in Lebanon was not hit by a 1-ton thermobaric bomb on 18-April-1983. Not on television in 2012 anyway.

-- Israel did not invade Lebanon in 1982.

-- And this non-invasion did not happen  over strenuous objections from Ambassador Robert Sherwood Dillon.

-- And Dillon, who may not even have existed if you ask the television, had not been a career C.I.A. guy and he certainly did not predict that Ariel Sharon's invasion would destabilize the country.

-- Dropping 2700-pound naval shells on Shiite and Druze villagers didn't happen.

-- Revenge is not a common motive among human beings. Iranians wouldn't want revenge for their people getting killed with American weapons. Shiite and Druze villagers would roll over too.

-- "Peacekeeper" doesn't end where artillery shells fall.

-- "They Came In Peace" is not a double-speak lie. It was not put together to spoof the families of the Marines and other service personnel who got pancaked:

Robert McFarlane got the decision to turn loose the USS New Jersey. He kept that process secret between his staff and the White House. No one asked critical questions. No one paid attention to what Dillon or Department of State had provided earlier.

None of these basic background facts exist in the television world. Nothing ties together.

There are no facts on television that lead this democracy to understand what has been done in its name. Even the one thing that was true -- the "Peacekeeper" tag -- had been made untrue for hundreds of villages by the time of the Marine barracks bombing.

Libya

The overall mission was to remove Muammar Gaddafi. We know how that distresses authoritarians, seeing a dictator shot. The country has 5,600,000 people. For putting together a democracy, Libyans score 90% literacy.

Obama used drones and CIA Arab-speaking assassins instead of Reagan's battleship and his grunt-speaking Marines. Times change.

The Obama Administration ran it's operations tight and they got results. No hurry. No heavy losses going in. Everybody they wanted dead, they got dead.

Oil money goes mainly to the Libyan people. Transparent and accountable. The government looks to be working.

Here are the Benghazi action items from the Pentagon's unclassified timeline:

September 11 (Events are listed using the time in Benghazi)

9:42 p.m. -- Armed men begin their assault on the U.S. Consulate.

9:59 p.m. -- A surveillance drone is directed to fly over the U.S. compound, but it is unarmed.

10:32 p.m. -- The Office of the Secretary Defense and the Joint Staff are notified of the attack by the National Military Command Center at the Pentagon. "The information is quickly passed to Secretary Panetta and General Dempsey."

11 p.m. -- Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey meet with President Obama at the White House where they discuss the unfolding situation and how to respond. The meeting had been previously scheduled.

11:10 p.m. -- The surveillance drone arrives over the Benghazi facility.

11:30 p.m. -- All surviving U.S. personnel are evacuated from the consulate. U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and State Department computer expert Sean Smith were killed in the initial assault.

September 12

1:30 a.m. -- A six-man security team from the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli arrives in Benghazi.

5:15 a.m. -- Attackers launch assault on a second U.S. facility in Benghazi. Two former U.S. Navy SEALs acting as security contractors are killed. They are identified as Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

7:40 a.m. -- The first wave of Americans are evacuated to Tripoli via airplane.

10 a.m. -- A second group, including those killed in the attack, are flown to Tripoli.

7:17 p.m. -- The C-17 leaves Tripoli with the American consulate personnel and the bodies of Stevens, Smith, Woods and Doherty.

You are not going to get a CIA timeline. Scrub everything that is not classified and you've got a blank page. Rumor has a team of contractors out of Benghazi trying to head off militia attacks, which is how Woods and Doherty were killed.

Comments from militia attackers covered a lot of ground. The California video titled Innocence of Muslims or Life of Muhammed is in there. A half-dozen claims go flying around. None of that matters -- hatred for America has been perking in the Middle East since McFarlane got the Reagan White House to O.K. taking the side of the Maranist Christians in Lebanon. Then Iraq and Abu Ghraib took that up three notches. (Everybody saw the Abu Ghraib pics.)

Rima Fakih, the Muslim Miss USA from a couple years ago, made a tiny dent in the anti-American sentiment. When she appeared on magazine covers for the region, that made a difference in the major cities. Those cover shots are on walls all over the place. There's no denying that an immigrant Muslim girl can make it in the United States.

One twist in Benghazi was a claim that the film maker, Sam Bacile, is "Israeli-American." He's Egyptian. A Coptic Christian, which doesn't go over well there, either.

Give a bunch of hot heads fully automatic weapons, lots of ammo, anti-tank missiles, grenades -- sounds like Crips 'n Bloods !!

Terrorism ????? Takes some kind of a brain to do terrorism.

If it's not a local take on Crips 'n Bloods, then it's 'Bama vs. Auburn. On with your colors. Rock 'n roll !!

The Libya attack was a mob running around with guns. The next day they got run out of town. Apart from Republican paranoia, mostly faked, there's nothing there.

Lessons For Doing "Empire Light"

-- First lesson is that you cannot trust anyone to tell you about a foreign culture, who doesn't speak the language of that culture.

That eliminates NeoCons, despite that they can usually speak a skosh of Arabic. Likud partisans are anti-Arab paranoids. It's a litmus test for party membership.

Nir Rosen wrote the definitive piece on what happened and what we have forgotten about Lebanon. Lessons Unlearned in Foreign Policy, from October 29, 2009. His lessons could not be simpler:

-- "America should avoid meddling in civil wars it doesn't understand."

-- "An even simpler lesson is to leave people alone."

-- "Stop killing Muslims, and there won't be any Muslims who want to kill you."

Apart from Bill Clinton choosing not to "meddle" in Rwanda, America hasn't done much of any of that going back to Jimmy Carter. "J.C." didn't much like killing people.

With Obama, looks like we fell into the most of it like a kid falling off a log into a pond. He has to wind down Afghanistan after kissing Iraq goodbye. Otherwise the test for military intervention with drones and small team assassins is whether we are pro-democracy.

You run out of countries that have oil and need a democracy make-over pretty quickly.

Nir Rosen's blog has first-rate links and links to other links. More or less, from what you can read there, he covered the Iraq War embedded with the insurgents. And yes, he is fluent in Arabic with an Iraqi accent.

“How we Lost the War we Won” (Rolling Stone Magazine article about the Taliban) is a decent starting point.

Be prepared to give up days of your time when you get to the Iraq War.

Fascinating.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  The Marine barracks bombing still rankles. (17+ / 0-)

    Press coverage sucks and Thomas Friedman got more ink for having 2% of a story than any other hack at the NYTimes.

    We knew one of the gals who was widowed that day. She has remarried and has kids. At the time it didn't look like more than a 50:50 on her avoiding suicide. I don't know how she hung on.

    Reagan's appointees were every bit as much self-serving knuckleheads as the worst of the Bushies.

    •  It's 241 (US) killed, not 392 (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      bontemps2012

      You won't like this; I don't like it at all: but in US politics, all that matters is the number of Americans killed, not other nationalities. Rather hideous, no? But take my word for it. Your diary would have broader reach (outside the 'choir') if it said 241 instead of 392. (The 58 French paratroopers killed, etc., somehow don't 'count' in US politics.)

      [This is even more true when the deaths are our 'enemies' (even if they're civilian deaths).  It's reasonably well known how many Americans have died in Iraq: 4,488. But estimates of Iraqi civilian deaths range anywhere from 110,000 (IBC) to 650,000 (Lancet).  Same with Vietnam -- 58,000 Americans killed (a huge number); but estimates of Vietnamese deaths range from 1,000,000 to 3,000,000 -- a number 20 times as big for a population one-fifth the size (so 100 times the impact). In the US, at least, the "58,000 killed" figure is much more widely known than the 1-3 million estimates.]

      That said, your diary is rich, clear, and full of powerful insight -- I've Rec'd and Tipped. 241 Americans were killed on Reagan's 'watch' in Beirut, and Democrats did not make a huge partisan issue of it, unlike what Republicans have done with the tragic death of our Ambassador and 3 others in Libya.

      241 American servicemen:

      •  241 at the Marine barracks. (0+ / 0-)

        63 victims at the embassy 18-April-1983.
        58 at the French barracks.
        30 at Tyre for the Israelis.

        Yes, we know how to add. And we count all humans equally, excepting the suicide bombers for reason of intention.

        The Total Extra Deaths figure for Iraq was generated, first, from a team out of Johns-Hopkins and then verified locally by the Iraq health ministry.

        It relies on counting actual population and adjusting for expatriation of survivors. Other surveys tried to count bodies, one way or another. Where all residents had been killed or dispersed, that was not practical.

        The official U.S. Army figure for TED in Vietnam is 2,600,000 and Robert McNamara said he thought it was 3,400,000.

        War punishes carelessness, as nothing else.

        Thank you.

      •  Changed to clarify. (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Sharon Wraight

        Thanks again.

  •  Correct. The Free Press Concept Doesn't Work for (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bnasley, George3, Pluto, 2thanks, bontemps2012

    informing the citizens of a democracy.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Sun Nov 18, 2012 at 07:35:48 PM PST

  •  awesome, and timely, diary. much thanks. (6+ / 0-)

    to republicans rape is "God's will" but homosexuality is somehow a "choice". republican yahweh is a dick.

    by bnasley on Sun Nov 18, 2012 at 07:45:57 PM PST

  •  Surprisingly nuanced for a post so strident. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    2thanks, bontemps2012

    But I have to admit, you basically had me at "what's so good about Reagan?"  T&R

    Ceterum censeo Factionem Republicanam esse delendam.

    by journeyman on Sun Nov 18, 2012 at 09:59:11 PM PST

  •  Thank you for remembering these events, so few (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    2thanks, bontemps2012

    do anymore, or the lessons that should have been learned.

    I even see George Schultz on the boobtoob once in a while, another lyin' SOB. I think McFarlane bugged out or something.
    No Marine brass were ever held accountable for the inexcusable lack of security.
    Then later we slunk away with nothing at all to show for all of it, in a positive sense.
    'A strategy devised by idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing'.

    This diary should be on the reclist.

    "Double, double, toile and trouble; Fire burne, and Cauldron bubble... By the pricking of my Thumbes, Something wicked this way comes": Republicans Willkommen im Vierten Reich! Sie haben keine Bedeutung mehr.

    by Bluefin on Sun Nov 18, 2012 at 10:51:40 PM PST

    •  George Schultz was a smart guy. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ichibon

      Robert McFarlane, however, made the term "weasel" a slam on rodents.

      This axxhole wangled himself a promotion out of the disaster by spreading the blame to the military, to one paralyzed Army officer in particular. That officer had been the lead for the building, but in truth he was not the C.O. despite the story that was constructed between McFarlane and the other pr creeps.

      McFarlane lies about when he got his big promotion. Says he got it before the bombing.

      The actual C.O. for the operation and the officer responsible for building safety was Tim Geraghty. He was not paralyzed. He was not wounded.

      So they blamed the guy who did the duty rosters and got the mess working.

      They never, ever mention lighting up the New Jersey and wasting villages up the hills. That the 23-October-1983 blast was purest payback for their bloody tactics on behalf of the Maranist Christians. (Spotting for the New Jersey was iffy at best. They didn't have anybody in there on the ground with radio-and-binos to call the strikes.)

      Never mentions the embassy bombing 6-months earlier.

      All this lying worked for McFarlane. Got himself promoted from Assistant NSA to National Security Adviser.

      And Reagan got to feel bad about it. Never fixed a damn thing -- put his tail between his legs and ran away. Promoted the blood-handed weasel.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site