Skip to main content

   Here we sit, somewhere near a fiscal cliff, or curb, I suppose it depends on where you sit in relation to the edge. Who actually cares about what, and who is just leveraging one component to get something done with another, hostage taking, the whole mirror dodge drill. I think the only thing the two Americas and their creditors agree on, is that it has to stop.

                                              After the rusty iron rococo cartouche

  What it seems like is tit-for-tat or a pensioner's dilemma game. It feels like that because no one seems really invested in the outcomes, and holding the players accountable is a long arduous process.

   Here is what I float as a way of herding the cats:

Take the leadership of each party and each committee, have them reduce their rhetoric to a position on each component of the fiscal cliff; entitlements, debt ceiling,  Bush tax rate expiration, other spending cuts, you don't want too many line items or positions but you don't want too few. You make an effort to match each side's list in a committee. Say the Democratic Party says no cuts to entitlements, and Boehner's boys say Ryan Plan. Then you give leadership the chance to counter other proposed items from the other side or negotiate them into an already existing line-item.

  Ultimately you come up with a list of issues that represent each side and give the other side a chance to counter. I admit some common sense and compromise is necessary to fashion such a simple ballot so the idea is unworkable.  Yet I move on to the fun part.

social security
tax cuts
debt ceiling


  It's all there. One position from each leadership about what ultimately will shape the deal. Now, however many issues you come up with, you multiply that by a number greater than 2. I am sure if this were a real idea, mathematicians, stat geeks, Nate Silver, and Political Science theorists on advanced voting systems could come up with a multiplier.

 Now you hand each representative a ballot and a number of votes to allot according to their priorities. The fun part is the ballots are public and transparent and over time give a fairly easy to understand statistical representation of what your congressperson is all about.

So if the GOP want to save tax cuts for the rich, and want it known they are pro job creator, they can load up, and blow off entitlements. Deficit hawks can load up too. But that is all they get out of the deal.

Careful, career oriented representatives will learn you can bring the same priorities to every fight.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    And now it's all right. it's ok. And you may look the other way. We can try to understand The new york times effect on man.

    by Marcellus Shale on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 05:51:12 AM PST

  •  There are fairies at the bottom of my garden (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Marcellus Shale

    … I keep hoping that the little people will waive their wands and transform the plastic… Republicans into the little trolls that they truly are.

    You have an interesting idea. Unfortunately, your idea has as much chance of being used as hell freezing over.

    Fire and Ice

    Some say the world will end in fire,
    Some say in ice.
    From what I've tasted of desire
    I hold with those who favor fire.
    But if it had to perish twice,
    I think I know enough of hate
    To say that for destruction ice
    Is also great
    And would suffice.

    Robert Frost

    The fiscal cliff is not to be feared; but it should be fixed.

    Practice tolerance, kindness and charity.

    by LWelsch on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 06:21:47 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site