Skip to main content

Three Tar Sands Blockaders were arrested this morning after two of them barricaded themselves inside the Keystone XL pipeline which is under construction in Texas:

Our 3 brave friends that barricaded themselves into a mile long section of KXL pipe yesterday are being held in the Smith County Jail on $65,000 bail each. The charges are criminal trespass, resisting arrest, and illegal dumping (between 500-1,000 lbs) all of which are misdemeanors.

This bail amount is not only outrageous its illegal. According to the Texas Penal Code no one can be held on bail of more than $5,000 per misdemeanor charge. Our lawyers are working to fight this illegal bail amount.

-BREAKING: Two People Barricade Themselves Inside Keystone XL Pipe To Halt Construction

Tar Sands Blockade has put out a call for donations to assist in the legal defense of these courageous activists, who are putting their bodies on the line to stop changing the climate. The Keystone XL pipeline is being built to transport oil from the Canadian tar sands. This oil is the worst for climate change because it takes a lot of energy to extract in the first place and because it destroys forest carbon sinks to mine.

Tar Sands Blockade has put out a call for donations to support the legal defense of the Blockaders. You can donate HERE.

Every reasonable person agrees that we have to stop changing the climate. A recent article in the journal Nature details the fact that to avoid grave human consequences of >2c warming we must peak emissions very soon then decline sharply and perhaps even implement negative emissions technologies to remove pollution from the air. The authors state in the abstract that: "A shift to a 2 °C pathway requires immediate significant and sustained global mitigation, with a probable reliance on net negative emissions in the longer term" (Nature, Dec 2012). While Rome burns, the leaders fiddle and feed the flames.

We have to stop changing the climate and we have to force our leaders to pay attention, not hope they'll eventually get around to it. For this reason, direct action is essential. The Tar Sands Blockade is using non-violent resistance to oppose a grave global injustice. If, as expected, the Northern leg of the pipeline is approved their actions will be joined by groups like Bold Nebraska. we have a moral imperative to stop new fossil fuel infrastructure, and infrastructure for the tar sands is especially important to Blockade because tar sands oil is among the worst in the world for the climate.

Ask yourself this. Would you have joined the abolitionists? Would you have marched with the suffragettes? Would you have marched for civil rights? By continuing to change the climate we are perpetrating a grave global injustice and non-violent direct resistance is every bit as justified and necessary now as it was to those historical injustices.

NASA climatologist James Hansen declared "Game Over for the Climate" if the tar sands are fully exploited, and he put his body where his mouth is getting arrested protesting pipeline construction. As Bill McKibben points out, we just simply cannot burn all the fossil fuel reserves we already have, so what is the point of opening up new ones?

If you cannot put your body on the line in the Carbon Blockade, please consider putting some money on the line to support the courageous activists taking a stand to stop changing the climate. You can donate: HERE.

The currently recoverable tar sands reserves (which are but a fraction of the total) already almost exceed the fair share of carbon sequestration sequester capacity for Canada and the US:

"If the current populations of the USA and Canada burnt the 'economically viable' proven oil-sands reserve (170 billion barrels), they would achieve a per capita carbon footprint of 64 tonnes3. This number does not include other sources of carbon emissions, such as coal fired power stations, natural gas usage, conventional crude oil usage, etc, etc. Thus if the populations of the USA and Canada were to extensively utilize the Alberta oil-sands proven reserve, it would almost certainly be incompatible with doing a globally equal share (85 tC) in keeping warming below 2°C. For comparison, the current Chinese population would achieve a cumulative per capita carbon footprint of 16 tonnes, by utilizing the entire Alberta oil sands proven reserve. This is below the 85 tC 'equal share', but of course does not include other emissions sources. These figures should be borne in mind before committing to large scale, long term oil-sands infrastructure projects such as the Keystone XL and Northern Gateway pipelines. "

-Canadian carbon footprints and the Alberta oil sands in the global context

The facts fully justify the Tar Sands Blockade. We can't wait around for our leaders to act. We have to create the social conditions that make action possible and necessary, just as the abolitionists, suffragettes, and civil rights movement did through non-violent direct action. Even President Obama has admitted that he cannot force change from the top down. We will only stop this grave global injustice if we take urgent action.
Poll

Is it time for direct action to stop changing the climate?

70%12 votes
29%5 votes

| 17 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    War on Error, Mentatmark

    Passive renunciation is not the whole of wisdom.

    by play jurist on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 08:39:09 AM PST

  •  Can't stick around for comments. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    War on Error, DawnN

    Sorry. But wanted to get this out there so people can help however they can.

    Passive renunciation is not the whole of wisdom.

    by play jurist on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 08:40:42 AM PST

  •  Heavy handed law (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    skohayes, DawnN

    Remember Tim DeChristopher, now in jail.

    What's with the "illegal dumping" charge?  What was dumped?

    Thanks for the report.

    It's difficult to be happy knowing so many suffer. We must unite.

    by War on Error on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 08:45:45 AM PST

  •  I hate to break this to you, (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    johnny wurster, VClib

    but the Keystone pipeline has been up and functioning in the US for years.
    At this moment, the tar sands oil is piped to Oklahoma, where it is refined and sold as gasoline in the midwest.
    The Texas extension would be the last phase of the pipeline, and carry the oil to Port Arthur, where it will be refined and sold on the global market.
    Frankly, stopping the Texas extension won't do much good.

    “We are not a nation that says ‘don’t ask, don’t tell.’ We are a nation that says ‘out of many, we are one.’” -Barack Obama

    by skohayes on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 09:31:39 AM PST

    •  Keystone XL silly. (0+ / 0-)

      Don't be so condescending. Of course there's already a Keystone pipeline to Oklahoma. We're talking about the expansion of that to accommodate increased tar sands oil production by Shell. I know what I'm talking about. The Keystone XL can carry much larger volume, and to the Gulf for foreign export. We should not be expanding fossil fuel infrastructure at this critical time for the climate. I'll take James Hansen's word on what's good for the climate over random guy online.

      Passive renunciation is not the whole of wisdom.

      by play jurist on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 12:19:25 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  i'm happy to help with their legal expenses (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    VClib

    but they really didn't try to "stop climate change" by blocking a single pipeline.

    Personally, I think it's pretty much too late, but that's just me. And, we're pretty much stuck with this warming climate no matter what we do, for at least a half-century. But, there's still a chance "something" will be done (but doubtful--after all there will be 9 to 12 billion people on this planet in fifty years. And fifty years after that? Who knows. None? 12 billion? 6 billion? We'll see.)

    But I support direct action efforts, even if I still think they're futile.

    pseudoscience can kill

    by terrypinder on Tue Dec 04, 2012 at 09:39:29 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site