Skip to main content

Getting my liberal friends to add emotive content to their arguments is like getting my three year old to eat anything we call chicken - it's not that she doesn't like chicken, but if we call it that, she won't eat it.  She'll instantly claim that she doesn't like it.  

Now, my wife and I know this cannot possibly be true, she loves real chicken: chicken soup, chicken and rice casserole and chicken fingers and more.  So it goes with my three year old (and most others' three year olds too, I would guess), and this faces us with a choice - we noticed that she'll eat chicken if we don't call it that.  We could lie to her and call it 'turkey' or something similar or keep our mouths shut and let her munch happily along in oblivious bliss.  We could, but we don't; we won't trick her and we won't lie to her.  We just need to keep presenting her with real chicken until she's ready to try it, as chicken.  How do we convince her to try chicken?  Rhetoric, conviction and repetition.  We use rhetoric to show her how yummy it is, we show how much fun we have eating it, and we do it convincingly.  And we do it over and over and over, night after night.  It's how we got her to like rice, and mashed potatoes and lollypops and spinach.  Ok, we never had any trouble with lollypops; that's just a dream of mine.

If you're a Republican, something else is dreamy: people don't change all that much from their three year old selves.  Want to convince some nice old lady that President Obama personally is out to get her? Just lie to that poor little old lady and get a bunch of deep-voiced authority figures to tell her about the "death panels" in Obamacare over and over and over.  Simple, really - rhetoric (they're panels! ...of DEATH!), conviction (hey, Brit Hume said it and didn't laugh!), repetition (at 7am, 730am, 9am, 12pm, 2pm, 4pm, 430pm, 7pm, 715pm, 730pm...)

Now, it's possible to overdo it.  This year was a year of rhetorical failure for Republicans.  They went too far in their lies and people saw through those lies and we won by almost by default.  Almost.  People were driven away in disgust in order to escape a horrific onslaught of reductions in simple human rights that the Right would usher in - Republicans lost women, blacks, Asians, the young and Hispanics at shameful rates.  Simultaneously, Obama For America turned out the single most effective GOTV machine ever created.  But our rhetoric was terrible!  It was horrible, no good and very bad!  It was nearly all of the form of "look how looney those guys are!"  There were the Bain Capital ads, My-wife-died-because-I-didn't-have-healthcare ads, Todd-Aiken-is-a-crazy-Mommy-Murderer!eleventy!!1! ads, and other similar ads that were the bulk of campaign spending by Dems on messaging.  That's great!  It only works if and when Republicans actually and really come across as looney.  

But do not make the mistake of thinking that Republicans aren't going to simply repackage their extreme policy priorities in a way that makes it much more palatable: no senior personnel changes are forthcoming at Focus on the Family, or at Cato or Heritage Foundation or any other font of right-wing wrongness - they're going to stop saying that there are 'no exceptions' and start saying 'life of the child', in other words, they're going to stop calling chicken 'chicken'.  It will take them a few months, maybe a couple of years, but it will happen - they won't really be calling it chicken anymore, but Freedom Fowl or Tax Free Range Birds. Once they come back with their new and shiny take on their old and busted ideas, if we haven't already been actively selling progressive and liberal ideas - firing up our base and making good, convincing arguments for our side - we'll be stuck making 'look at those loonies!' arguments against a bunch of people who really don't look like loonies.  It's clear that we need to sell liberal and progressive ideas better, and who do we sell those ideas to?  Our base, of course.

Let's also be clear as to why it's necessary to fire up our base.  We get great use out of that great network effect that draws people in who don't like labels, 'independents' and people who are not identifying as Democrats or liberals or progressives, but can and do vote that way.  If you want those independents, you must fire up the base.  Why?  Here's another reason.  It's the base that really puts the arguments into the mainstream, not the activists, not the bloggers or the elected officials and not party loyalists.  

The job of the politically activated is to package the ideas of the party into forms that are easy to remember, easy to repeat and work from the conclusion and not the premise.  If you feel this is an incorrect assessment, I have two words for you: Death Panels.  You're going to have to do a lot of work explaining 2010.  However, since nobody's done that work in any sort of convincing manner, let's continue on with the real work of how to convince the base to turn out every election, not just every four years.  (See the frame there?  The 'real' work is convincing the base, that other, less real work is stuff that does not work towards that end.  There's no lie there but people who think differently are forced to either ignore it and let it stand or argue it and give me the repetition necessary to convince people that my frame is the better one - either way, I win.  You can argue all day long about how I'm wrong, I'll just disagree with you politely and take the 'reasonable' stance, then I win again.  Attacking points directly tends to lose in the marketplace of ideas - why do you think you never see ads detailing how horrible it is to own, say, a Honda?  Because an ad like that is an ad FOR Honda.)

That's why.  On to how.  First, we need (care to guess?) rhetoric, conviction and repetition to accomplish our goals.  Of course we need to think carefully about our policy stances and we need to develop deeply nuanced policies in line with clear liberal premises using a powerful understanding of the issues.  But then!  But then we burst into action and sell those policies with an eye towards the emotional content of our sales pitch.  It may be simplified, but that's the nature of a sales pitch - you have less than 15 seconds to make your case.  You're not going to get a do-over and you're not going to have time to explain complex dynamics.  It's got to be simple but right and punchy but positive.  People who are interested will delve deeper, but you're never going to sell good policy to people who only have time for an executive summary if you insist on giving them the dissertation itself.  That bears repeating: You're never, ever, ever going to sell good policy to people who only have time for an executive summary if you insist on giving them the dissertation.  You, dear reader, have time for the dissertation, that's why you read blog posts like this.

Additionally, we've got to claim the frames available and make space for new frames.  What do I mean by that?  Well, I may be just some latte-drinking, arugula-eating Yankee liberal who likes ObamaCare, but I know an awful lot of people who are proud to call themselves gay, redneck and jarhead who know a thing or two about claiming a frame.  There's only one response that works when it comes to using labels to frame an argument: claim it, hard.  Every other response lets your opponent either use it unopposed, and we can ask John "Swiftboat" Kerry about how that worked out, or reinforces it through repetition of the opposition's own ideas.  They get to give a lie some semblance of reality.  If a label is used to pigeonhole you, then the only valid rhetorical response is to make the label unappealing as a weapon by defining your own version.  And how do you get that redefinition to work?  With rhetoric, conviction and repetition (sound familiar?).  

"So, you think that there should be no exceptions for abortions?  Interesting.  But families will lose loved ones if that policy is implemented.  Why do you want to be a Mommy Murderer?"  

"Of course I eat arugula!  Why are you against healthy eating?  Moderate voters and independents are in favor of healthy eating you extremist!"  

"Of course I'm liberal, free markets work for everyone!  Why are you against free markets? Oh, you're not one of those people who think open, unregulated markets are a good idea, are you?  Oh bless your heart."

Then do it again, and again and again, ad nauseum.  By the time you're sick of it, the base will have just started picking it up and putting it into the mainstream.  Don't make the mistake of thinking that doing this once is enough: a thousand times is too few.  Welcome to reality.  That's how the human brain works and we don't get to change it.

Lastly, I think some people get hung up on how the Right uses rhetoric: they lie.  Constantly.  About everything.  Shamefully.  Conservatives have no problem 'unskewing' things they don't like: polls, evolution, AGW, the Constitution, race relations, economics and on and on and on - reality looks like a plateful of chicken?  Pretend it's cheese!  That's the Republican answer to 'stuff we don't like'.  We liberals don't do that.  When we make our sales pitch, it is, it must be, correct.  Some people think we liberals will go down that road ourselves if we use rhetoric in our word choices, conviction in our voices and then have the temerity to repeat, repeat, repeat our ideas.  

But that's not how the left uses rhetoric - we don't need to lie.  Really, we don't.  One of the tastiest slices of rhetorical heaven ever created perfectly embodies this idea: Reality has a well-known Liberal bias.  Here's another rhetorical gem: Colbert said it.  I believe it.  That settles it.  Conviction sells just like sex.

Our rhetoric is only as good or as evil as we ourselves are.  We can take the measure of the man by examining his use of argument: does he lie to get his way like the people on the Right do? That tells you everything you need to know about a person's motivations - they don't care that you think, they only care about what you think.  You're only as good to them, to Republicans, as you're able to support their ideas.  That's how the Right uses rhetoric, and it's wrong.  But we don't do that, we do real good, using the truth and make real change in people's lives.

Really.  We should eat more real chicken.  Just not at Chick-fil-A.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (31+ / 0-)

    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
    - Salvor Hardin, Foundation by Isaac Asimov
    Permissive Liberal: -7.62, -7.95

    by Zyx on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:05 AM PST

  •  Yes! Start now, not three months before (10+ / 0-)

    the next election!

    Between now and then the right will be streaming their message non-stop, and it won't be the truth and it will come in catchy little soundbites.  I'm pretty sure this is what will happen because I've seen them doing it ever since Reagan.

    Want to know what else I've seen?  Progressives going to sleep in between elections, especially the ones we do well in.  I hope to see something different this cycle, and it's posts like this that remind us of the problem and the solution that may make the difference.

    Remember though, you're going to have to post something like this regularly to keep reminding us!

    Thanks!

    -7.38, -5.38 (that's a surprise)

    I lie to myself because I'm the only one who continues to believe me. - Vermin

    by 84thProblem on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 03:36:10 AM PST

  •  Required reading... (6+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Wee Mama, Mannie, pademocrat, Odysseus, Zyx, madhaus

    The Political Brain by Drew Westin. It uses actual science to show how people vote and emotion has a lot to do with it. It was written before Obama was first elected but it still applies today. Highly recommended.

    FREEDOM ISN'T FREE: That's why we pay taxes. I Had A Thought

    by mole333 on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 04:41:53 AM PST

  •  I like it (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Wee Mama, Mannie, Zyx

    mostly because I get to make fun of people.
    Your examples are ROFL, and I think you are spot on with this approach. Logic doesn't work. If it did, the republican party would have imploded after Reagan, when it first became apparent, logically, that his economic voodoo was just that. It certainly wouldn't have survived the crash of '08 or the Iraq Adventure.
    I have essentially given u on attempts at convincing otherwise rational people that RW positions on everything are merely expressions of xenophobia and wealth capture. Going the public shaming route is far more appealing, especially when it comes to the proven science of climate change, evolution, and such.

    Stand for something, or you'll fall for anything - Malcolm X via Skindred

    by kamarvt on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 04:53:52 AM PST

  •  Kids and food, to funny, when my guy was about (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    a2nite, Zyx

    7 or 8, he did not like cheese.  It was just he and I and occasionally we would eat out at restaurants.  I always ordered cheesecake for desert.  He, something else, while complaining about my cheesecake and how awful it must be.  I always told him, try it you might be surprised.  Never pushed it directly. One day he asked what that was on the bottom of the cheesecake. Graham cracker crust I replied, want to taste it.  To this day he tries everything.  Me, not so much.  At one point in his acting career in NY, he was the head waiter at Asia de Cuba, a fine dining restaurant.  My how things change, there is just some stuff on that menu that I was not going to try. He loves all kinds of cheese now, and cheesecake.  

  •  Thanks guys! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pandoras Box

    The glowing praise means a lot.  I mean, I know DKOS is a very supportive community, but I was expecting that there'd be more nay-sayers.

    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
    - Salvor Hardin, Foundation by Isaac Asimov
    Permissive Liberal: -7.62, -7.95

    by Zyx on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 08:20:50 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site