Skip to main content

Recent government actions to provide nutritional information, or even take strong action like super-sized soda bans, has created strong blowback. But...maybe some government involvement is not only desirable, but even needed.

Recently, in response to New York Mayor Bloomberg’s soda ban, First Lady Michele Obama’s concern about childhood obesity, and newly mandated restaurant nutritional information, there is considerable blowback about government intrusion into our eating habits. A seemingly common sense response. However, despite government mandated calorie information it has been reported that: “…only 28 percent said the information influenced their ordering…and those four states with soda-specific sin taxes…rank among the most obese in the nation.”

Well, using these figures, so much for depending on individuals to make wise food choices, even with government prodding.  Clearly, more effort is needed by both the private and public sectors.  Additionally, there are at least three good reasons for the government to at least provide nutritional information, and even “push” consumers into better food choices.

First, all nations throughout history have pressed for a more healthy, fit, and energetic citizenry.  Going back to the early Olympics, it was never about city/states competing, it was about individuals who were exemplary in their fitness and athleticism. Indeed, during historical periods of war and strife, it was the nations who were most fit that generally prevailed, and government involvement was significant. So government concern about health and fitness matters is not only desirable, but in a sense necessary if America is to remain strong and healthy. And despite Gunlock’s objections to government health actions, America is doing a poor job – so poor that our ranking on health-related issues is a disgrace.  And likely even worse without some government prodding.

According the World Health Organization (WHO), in the last survey they did on national health rankings, the United States ranked 37th, just behind Costa Rica. Again, in life expectancy, we ranked 24th, just ahead of Cyprus.  However, there was one category in which we were number one: health care costs per capita. WHO has an umbrella category that includes per capita rankings which include health, responsiveness, financial fairness and cost? Here, America is number one! We have the highest per capita health care costs in the world.

So, some government “concern” for raising the health standards in our country is well warranted. Lack of solid preventative health care is costing our country – and taxpayers – a bundle. Mitigating that cost would have a rich return.

As previously noted, some blowback was due to the mandate by Bloomberg to ban super sized sodas, in an effort to combat obesity. The fact is, according to a survey of the National Council of State Legislatures, obesity is a major cause higher health care cost. Indeed, in 2009, they estimated “State-Level Estimated Annual Obesity-Attributable Expenditures, by State” the added cost in New York State in over $11 billion. Why the high cost associated with obesity? Overweight folks suffer more hypertension, diabetes, stroke, heart disease and other ailments at a far greater rate than the general population. But New York is not alone (and far from the worst state) when it comes to the issue of obesity in America. Almost all states have an obese population of over 25 percent; with some has high as one third of all adults significantly overweight.

The national organization Prevent Obesity has recently reported that in my home state, “Minnesota’s obesity rates could soar to 54.7 percent by 2030”…and, “adult obesity rates in 2030 could surpass 60 percent in 13 states, and at least 44 percent in every state.”

Moreover, government involvement in our food chain is not new, nor undesirable.  True, placing added rules or information at the retail and restaurant level is more recent, but it is far from a dramatic intrusion into what foods we choose to eat or drink. The government has – rightfully and thankfully – protected us for decades against tainted, contaminated or significantly hazardous food products. Additionally, the current concern regarding obesity and poor food choices should be welcomed. Especially by parents, because the overweight rate among children is the fastest growing segment of obesity. In 1963 about 4 percent of children from the ages of 6-11 were overweight; today almost 20 percent are.

So, in answering the question: “Do we really need government either suggesting or how much soda we can drink; how much saturated fat is damaging; how much salt goes into a can of soup?” Well, maybe we do. Until or unless we can find some effective ways to keep our country from sliding in world health rankings…being more competitive in life expectancy…stopping the growing trend towards a nation of obesity…driving down our outrageously high health costs…and making us a more fit nation – then I personally appreciate the state on my plate.

Poll

The government's actions to prod consumers into better eating habits should:

80%4 votes
0%0 votes
20%1 votes

| 5 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site