Skip to main content

This has to be a new low.

A company -- in this case the Kansas City Star newspaper -- feels the need to lay off an employee. Instead of making the decision themselves, the Star management targets two reporters and tells them to decide among themselves which one gets the heave ho.

Layoffs can be ugly no matter how they are handled.  Lives can be ruined.

But the Kansas City Star might have taken the stress of being laid off to a new level by telling at least two employees recently for them to determine which one will stay at the McClatchy-owned paper, and which one will likely hit the unemployment line.

The two employees are reporters Karen Dillon and Dawn Bormann.

“Dillon has seniority, so she has the option of taking it or not taking it,” says a source. “And if she does, Dawn gets laid off. Dawn’s a great person but I think Karen will vote in favor of herself because she’s got teenage kids at home.”
I find this rather barbaric.

Imagine being told that you have to decide whether you get to keep your or job. And if you pick yourself, somebody else -- possibly a friend -- gets laid off. Imagine being put in the position of having to hurt someone else in order to protect yourself.

It seems to me to be a pretty disgusting way for management to shift blame for the layoff to someone else -- Hey, we didn't decide to lay you off, your co-worker did.


If you had to choose between your own job and the job of a friend/co-worker, who would you choose

20%19 votes
4%4 votes
65%60 votes
8%8 votes

| 91 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site