Skip to main content

This is a TERRIBLE idea.As part of the bargaining with the Republicans on deficit reduction President Obama has proposed to adopt the chained CPI method of calculating inflation for future Social Security payments.

The White House says the president’s plan would cut spending by $1.22 trillion over 10 years, compared with $1.2 trillion in cuts from the Republicans’ initial offer. Of that, $800 billion is cuts to programs, and $122 billion comes from adopting a new measure of inflation that slows the growth of government benefits, especially Social Security. The White House is also counting on $290 billion in savings from lower interest costs on a reduced national debt.
http://www.nytimes.com/...

More details here:

http://www.dailykos.com/...

Social Security contributes $0 to the deficit or Federal debt and is fully solvent for at least the next 20 years by the most pessimistic estimates.

Please take action and contact the White House and voice your opposition to this proposal.

Comments: 202-456-1111
Write: http://www.whitehouse.gov/....

And call your senators and reps

If I had wanted cuts to Social Security I would have voted for a Republican, not a Democrat.

This is just a bridge too far.

We WON the election.remember President Obama?

Tue Dec 18, 2012 at 1:12 AM PT: h/t to  BigDuck

WH petition against SS cuts
Make no cuts to Social Security  at petitions.whitehouse.gov.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/...

Originally posted to Faroutman on Mon Dec 17, 2012 at 07:47 PM PST.

Also republished by The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party and Social Security Defenders.

Poll

Chained CPI is

4%42 votes
16%145 votes
4%38 votes
0%3 votes
1%10 votes
72%641 votes

| 879 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences