Skip to main content

Apparently President Obama held a secretive, "Off the Record" meeting December 4th with a few of our finest voices that included:

Most of MSNBC’s prime time lineup — Al Sharpton, Ed Schultz, Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O’Donnell — attended

/snip

Jonathan Capehart and Greg Sargent

/snip
Josh Marshall & Markos Moulitsas

Link
the White House did at least issue this statement:

“This afternoon at the White House, the President met with influential progressives to talk about the importance of preventing a tax increase on middle class families, strengthening our economy and adopting a balanced approach to deficit reduction.”

The time has come for someone to come out and say what happened at that meeting.

I find it hard to believe that in a meeting with those folks no one mentioned Social Security.

If not one of those listed above thought Social Security was a worthy topic then we need to know that.

If the president promised to you that he would not jack with Social Security then to hell with the "off-the-record" bull crap, we deserve to know that.

If the president told those listed above that he would mess with Social Security then we, as your readers/viewers,  are due an explanation as to why you kept this from us.

I find it hard to believe that the above listed crowd did not talk policy, especially on something as obvious as touching Social Security.

If you were lied to during an off-the-record meeting then the secrecy sworn to is no longer valid.

Those names are strong voices on the left and are doing us a disservice in their silence.

Poll

Should we know anything about what was said?

73%34 votes
26%12 votes

| 46 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site