Skip to main content

"In 2008, 2,947 children and teens died from guns in the United States and 2,793 died in 2009 for a total of 5,740," details Protect Children Not Guns 2012 (Children's Defense Fund), "—one child or teen every three hours, eight every day, 55 every week for two years" (p. 2).

Tragedy is often reserved for single catastrophic events, but cumulative loss is no less tragic, particularly when the lives of innocent children and teens are placed in the context of daily violence.

While the places of mass shootings have become part of the lore of the U.S.—Columbine, Aurora, Fort Hood, Newtown—and while 24-hour news reporting blankets these tragedies, President Obama's proclaiming "they're all our children" and admitting American's failing their children can offer only tempered hope since political leaders and the public remain incapable of confronting and addressing the daily toll America's gun and violence fetish takes on children—especially at the intersection of race, class, gender, and gun access.

Sacrificing (Some) Children

In "Will Obama Cry for Inner City Youth?" David Muhammad shares an exchange with a friend and then confronts political blindness to gun violence and some children:

"She provided me with the information I was seeking. Then she included a P.S.: 'What a devastating horrible day in CT. But frankly I wish people cared this much when it was children on the south and west sides of Chicago.'...

"Gun violence in America is a pandemic, but there is no round-the-clock news coverage. No national address from the President with tears. No pledge for urgent change.

"Why? Is it because the children who die on the streets of America’s cities are black and brown? Is it because they are poor? What makes the victims of everyday inner-city gun violence expendable?"

These questions, like the direct question offered and answered by Obama just days after the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, lead to answers that are disturbing:
•The 5,740 children and teens killed by guns in 2008 and 2009:

+ Would fill more than 229 public school classrooms of 25 students each;
+ Was greater than the number of U.S. military personnel killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan (5,013).

• The number of preschoolers killed by guns in 2008 (88) and in 2009 (85) was nearly double the number of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty in 2008 (41) and 2009 (48).

• Black children and teens accounted for 45 percent of all child and teen gun deaths in 2008 and 2009 but were only 15 percent of the total child population.

• Black males 15-19 were eight times as likely as White males of the same age and
two-and-a-half times as likely as their Hispanic peers to be killed in a gun homicide in 2009.

• The leading cause of death among Black teens ages 15 to 19 in 2008 and 2009 was gun
homicide. For White teens 15 to 19 it was motor vehicle accidents followed by gun homicide in 2008 and gun suicide in 2009.

• The most recent analysis of data from 23 industrialized nations shows that 87 percent of the children under age 15 killed by guns in these nations lived in the United States. The gun homicide rate in the United States for teens and young adults ages 15 to 24 was 42.7 times higher than the combined rate for the other nations.

• Of the 116,385 children and teens killed by a gun since 1979, when gun data by age were first collected, 44,038 were Black—nearly 13 times more than the number of recorded lynchings of Black people of all ages in the 86 years from 1882 to 1968. Even so, more White than Black children and teens have died from gun violence. (p. 2)

The racial, gender, and class inequities among gun violence, imprisonment, and school discipline policies are stunningly similar. But in each context, political and public discourse remains focused on anything except the fact of the inequities—guns, the Second Amendment, criminals, failing schools and teachers.

The American gaze is both pinpoint and blind.

The NRA's delayed and commercial response to the Sandy Hook shooting represents both the tragedy of America's gun fetish—at its roots both a lust for violence and a mania for ownership that has supplanted a faith in liberty—and holds up a mirror to political leadership and the public: "There exists in this country, sadly, a callous, corrupt and corrupting shadow industry that sells and stows violence against its own people."

Yes, but this distraction about video games from the NRA is more accurately a description of the NRA.

The incidences of mass shootings, including the ones that massacre children, along with the daily loss of children to gun violence—notably the loss of "other people's children" who primarily happen to be in poverty, happen to be of color—are the realities America has created and the realities America tolerates.

Countries very similar to the U.S. in most ways have violent video games, TV and movies dripping with violence, and mental illness (all legitimate concerns that have been used to distract from rather than confront gun violence); yet, despite the NRA propaganda designed to boost weapons sales as part of their lobbying for the gun industry:

"By any standards of human and moral decency, children in America are under assault, and by international standards, America remains an unparalleled world leader in gun deaths of children and teens—a distinction we shamefully and immorally choose! The most recent analysis of data from 23 high-income countries reported that 87 percent of children under age 15 killed by guns in these nations lived in the United States. And the U.S. gun homicide rate for teens and young adults 15 to 24 was 42.7 times higher than the combined gun homicide rate for that same age group in the other countries [emphasis in original]." (p. 5; also see chart on p. 31)
The Sandy Hook Elementary shooting left a wake of images of 6 adults and 20 small children, all faces on a tragedy that many will not soon forget. That day was both unimaginable and inexplicable.

But the disembodied and faceless numbers exposing America's callous disinterest in accumulated gun violence, numbers that mask intolerable damage done to brown and black children living lives of poverty and violence that they did not choose—lives that their parents also lie buried beneath—appear not to trigger the same rhetoric, the same promises of action that mass shootings do, although side by side, the numbers are larger, the toll greater.

Take any child lost at Sandy Hook Elementary or any face of the hundreds of children behind the numbers catalogued by the Children's Defense Fund and substitute that face, that image for the "one more thing" revealed by the narrator of Ursula K. Le Guin's "The Ones Who Walk away from Omelas":

"The room is about three paces long and two wide: a mere broom closet or disused tool room. In the room a child is sitting. It could be a boy or a girl. It looks about six, but actually is nearly ten....

"They all know it is there, all the people of Omelas. Some of them have come to see it, others are content merely to know it is there. They all know that it has to be there. Some of them understand why, and some do not, but they all understand that their happiness, the beauty of their city, the tenderness of their friendships, the health of their children, the wisdom of their scholars, the skill of their makers, even the abundance of their harvest and the kindly weathers of their skies, depend wholly on this child's abominable misery."

Like the people of Omelas, Americans and our leaders know gun violence and its toll on children are there, but when will we acknowledge the cost of allowing gun ownership and sales—the promise of profit—to trump the children of the U.S.? When will we confront this failure at the intersection of race, class, gender, and gun violence?

That some people's privilege is on the backs of other people's children?

Le Guin's story ends with the narrator noting that some people, under the weight of knowing about this child trapped in the closet, simply walk away from Omelas. What I find most chilling about this dystopian tale is that the story does not include a single person acting against the inhumanity.

It is there that I find the story hitting too close to home.

Originally posted to plthomasEdD on Sun Dec 23, 2012 at 06:08 AM PST.

Also republished by Shut Down the NRA, Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA), and Education Alternatives.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks- great post (5+ / 0-)

    Whenever I 'speed' read- certain things jump out and .. stay-
    this is one:::

    "The most recent analysis of data from 23 high-income countries reported that 87 percent of children under age 15 killed by guns in these nations lived in the United States. And the U.S. gun homicide rate for teens and young adults 15 to 24 was 42.7 times higher than the combined gun homicide rate for that same age group in the other countries [emphasis in original]." (p. 5; also see chart on p. 31)"

    Best Regards,
    M. Martin, Assoc Editor, DowntownLALife.com

  •  In the absence of guns (4+ / 0-)

    In the absence of guns, America's black and brown children would still face inequalities of schooling and opportunity, greater arrest and incarceration rates, a greater liklihood of a lifetime in poverty, a greater liklihood of teen pregnancy and of being forced to raise their own children in poverty.

    Which is pretty sad and sickening.

    Of course, in the presence of guns, black and brown children face all that AND the greater risk of getting shot.

    The roots of the extreme levels of gun violence in America are pretty much the same as the roots of profound inequality of wealth and opportunity in America: a system of government that allows the wealthy to buy the law-makers and the laws they want.

    If we were to change our system of government so that ALL people could have a say in their government instead of just the wealthy people, we would shortly see not only a change to more sane gun laws and policy, but also towards more equal access to financial resouces and opportunities.  

    "The fool doth think he is wise: the wise man knows himself to be a fool" - W. Shakespeare

    by Hugh Jim Bissell on Sun Dec 23, 2012 at 06:52:02 AM PST

  •  if someone entered a predominantly black (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Smoh

    school and intentionally gunned down a bunch of kids, I don't think the public reaction would be any different.

  •  Protecting Guns, Sacrificing (Some) Children (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Smoh, DefendOurConstitution, SoCalSal

    Look at NRA's IRS 990! it is time to "reform" & remove NRA's non-profit 501(c)(4) Civic Leagues and Social Welfare Org status!

    •  Very ironic that an organization that is terrori- (0+ / 0-)

      zing our nation, with the strategy of proliferation to increase both fear and sales, gets tax exempt status meant for non-profits that assist in the well-being of the less fortunate.

      Then they came for me - and by that time there was nobody left to speak up.

      by DefendOurConstitution on Sun Dec 23, 2012 at 07:30:48 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Isn't “innocent” children redundant? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    plthomasEdD, FloridaSNMOM

    Don’t we assume all children are  “innocent”? Obviously, we don’t.

    I was discussing this dynamic with a friend the other day, and I asked, “at what age does a young black boy become a ‘young black male’?” (read: potential ‘menace to society’, a threat, a suspicious, shadowy figure whose very existence poses a “problem”).

    The problem is clearly that these black/brown/red children are somehow  stripped of their innocence in public perception (subconsciously in most individuals’ perceptions as well). And perhaps they have been stripped of their innocence, by a society that has been waging war against them for decades (drugs won in the war on drugs, poverty won in the war against poverty, and many of these children, even before they are shot and killed on the streets/on their porches/on the bus/in their schools/in the ‘wrong neighborhood’/while listening to the ‘wrong’ music, loudly).

    Somehow, this society has a hard time identifying any of these kids as “innocents.” The redundancy of  “innocent children” reiterates and reinforces that. Children are innocent. Period. All children. And as soon as you start referring to “innocent children”, the specter of “complicit children”--children who are somehow "guilty" by circumstance of birth--lurks in the wings.

  •  How many of these deaths are acceprable in order (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    plthomasEdD, SoCalSal

    to protect this "right" above all other rights?

    Thanks for the diary.

    One thing the gun nuts will likely jump all over you is that these numbers include suicide (about 25% from the data in the Protect Children Not Guns 2012).  Of course they always get up in arms and insist that only intentional/criminal deaths count, never accidental or suicide deaths.  They do this because it helps them with the meme that more people die in auto accidents that are murdered by guns.  To anyone arguing that suicide is not a violent death I suggest to ask the family of people that have taken their lives.  Now surely all suicides will not be stopped by making guns less accessible, but many will be and each one stopped is another chance for life.

    Then they came for me - and by that time there was nobody left to speak up.

    by DefendOurConstitution on Sun Dec 23, 2012 at 07:28:03 AM PST

  •  Shocking statistics, (0+ / 0-)

    very well written post.

    The sh*t those people [republicans] say just makes me weep for humanity! - Woody Harrelson

    by SoCalSal on Sun Dec 23, 2012 at 09:14:44 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site