Skip to main content

I am not saying that this was President Obama's intention. However, the fiscal cliff statement that the President just made appears to have turned off the House republicans enough to make this deal impossible.

more below the squiggle:

So, there would not be any cuts in this small "deal". It would raise taxes only on those making over $400K individually and $450K as households. It would preserve the tax cuts for those who make less. It would extend unemployment compensation. There is a debate over delaying the sequestration.

The President did say repeatedly that he will insist upon a balanced approach that increases revenue in a balanced way through asking the wealthy to pay a little more if spending cuts are to be pursued.

from Jed

Cantor's lead spokesguy // RT @dougheye: If Obama's goal was to harm the process and make going over the cliff more likely, he's succeeding.
— @edatpost via HootSuite
RT @JakeSherman: a top McConnell aide --> RT @HolmesJosh: Potus just moved the goalpost again. Significantly. This is new
— @samsteinhp via TweetDeck
from looking and listening
What the Dems get:

--52 week extension of unemployment benefits
--Capital gains increased from 15% to 20%
--Estate tax raised to 40%
--personal exemption phase-out for high-earners
--Earned Income Tax Credit (5 year extension)
--Child tax cre/dit (5 year extension)
--Colllege tax cr/edit (5 year extension)
.

What the Republicans get:

--Top marginal rate increase to $450,000 (from $250,000)

How is this a cave?  

I am weighing many factors and glad that President Obama is the one leading our party.

Factors include :

Without a deal:

No unemployment compensation for those unemployed
Automatic sequestration cuts take effect
Tax hikes on the middle class
A recession

With a bad deal :

We already will have tax increases on the wealthy no matter what - so why accept a deal that does not already presuppose that reality. It will take place in mere hours.

We will lose leverage because we give into hostage negotiations.

We will face cuts in the future that will hurt the middle class and seniors and the poor.

We will not get as much revenue as we need.

And in the future, we will have to deal with the debt ceiling issue soon.

11:46 AM PT: After Jan 3, Boehner might put this deal up for a vote but probably not since it will not be supported by a majority of the majority party . He certainly will not do it before then because he will not want to jeopardize his speakership

Lauren Monica gives us Ezra Klein's take

@ezraklein: Obama isn't making it easier for R's to vote for this deal. But WH probably thinks that if R's kill it, they get all the fiscal cliff blame.
FiredUpinCA
gives us this :

The Myth of the Obama Cave-In
Obama didn't wave the white flag in 2010. He turned a face-off over the Bush tax cuts into an opportunity to enact a second stimulus that he otherwise could not get past Senate Republicans.[...]

The package would extend the Bush tax cuts for all taxpayers for two years and would reduce estate taxes for the wealthy (a move many Democrats couldn't stand), but it also included a payroll tax cut, a child tax credit, additional unemployment insurance, renewable energy grants, and other stimulative measures. A White House chart noted that Obama had won $238 billion of stimulus in return for yielding on $114 billion in high-income tax cuts.

12:45 PM PT: the republicans would not be in that much worse shape after the tax cuts expire. They can simply put forward a bill to cut taxes on everybody making less than $500K and dare Democrats to vote against it. Revenue bills must originate in the House unless the Speaker chooses to take steps to alleviate that necessity.

President Obama and Democrats may actually do what they say- not pass (or in the President's case - veto) bills that are not balanced. He would say we got those tax cuts for free. That was the middle class. Or were you really opposed to those tax cuts for the middle class and only supported tax cuts for the wealthy. So, the President and Congressional Dems can stop any bills that simply cut spending without raising new revenue. And they can win that battle politically as well.

Therefore, BBB's position (which simply assumes the contrary) is probably incorrect. Not saying that his view should not be considered, but simply that in my estimation it is far from conclusive.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site