Skip to main content

Hello all,

I am fearful that beyond the roadblock that they present to progressive legislation, the current House majority threatens to make our country ungovernable, with consequences that may be well be disastrous over the next few years.  Hence I have drafted the following plea to House Democratic Leader Pelosi to seek to create a coalition of House Democrats and less-extreme Republicans to form a governing majority in the new Congress.  I am sending this to Pelosi at  I do not know how many of you will agree with me, as I am sure that many of you will reject any approach to the current crisis that depends on the cooperation of more conservative Democrats and traditional mainstream Republicans, but I would encourage anyone who shares my views to share them with her also, using my language or your own.  

I do not imagine that such a coalition could serve as a foundation for robust progressive change, but it might at least allow the country to be effectively governed over the next few years in a fashion that is not driven by an extremist conservative minority.

I also welcome comments from anyone who wishes to suggest either additional venues for putting forth this message, or alternative strategies for dealing with the reality of a House the includes a majority of members who were elected as Republicans.

Dear Leader Pelosi,

I write to you as a concerned American and Democrat to encourage you and your fellow Democratic leaders in the House to “think outside the box” in the days ahead to try to save our country from what threatens to be a catastrophic failure of governance at the hands of the extremists who dominate today’s House Republican majority.  It seems clear that neither sensible policy change nor even a continuation of routine governance will be possible over the next two years if the House is run by a Republican caucus that is dominated by members who respect neither the will of the majority of voters or democratic norms.  The current crisis in the House over a fiscal cliff package that was even endorsed by a majority of Senate Republicans makes clear that the current House GOP caucus cannot function as a governing partner.

At the same time, due to GOP gerrymandering and Democratic undervoting, we are faced with a Republican majority in the incoming Congress for at least the next two years and perhaps more.  

It seems to me that in this situation, if we are to avoid two years or more of crises that may lead to calamitous long-term consequences for America and the world, what is needed is for a coalition of House Democrats with the remaining mainstream conservatives in the House  Republican caucus to take control of the House in the new Congress and allow essential legislation to come to the floor without the acquiescence of GOP extremists.

Realistically, it seems unlikely that even the most pragmatic of today’s Republicans would support you as Speaker at the head of such a coalition.  But perhaps one of your more conservative Democratic colleagues, or some relative moderate on the GOP side, could lead the House over the next two years in a fashion that—while unlikely to be fully satisfactory to those of us whose preferences are in the Democratic mainstream—would at least allow the country to move forward in a functional fashion.  This should not preclude a Democratic campaign to regain a House majority and true governing authority in 2014 or 2016.  At the same time, it is likely that some political and/or personal assurances would have to be given to any GOP Representatives who join this proposed coalition, as it will be difficult for them to win GOP primary races in 2014.

Perhaps there are other less “radical” ways out of our current predicament.  But in any case, I hope that you and your colleagues will accept that the current crisis may require you to make choices that break with tradition and go outside of the “comfort zone” of many, in order to meet the challenge to our country from a House majority that even centrist observers now acknowledge is dominated by “insurgent extremists.”

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I appreciate creative thinking. I'm not (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    sure if I agree with you, but I certainly applaud the effort to be thinking about alternative solutions.

    Plutocracy (noun) Greek ploutokratia, from ploutos wealth; 1) government by the wealthy; 2) 21st c. U.S.A.; 3) 22nd c. The World

    by bkamr on Tue Jan 01, 2013 at 03:27:18 PM PST

  •  Will not! (0+ / 0-)

    No thank you.  I can live with tax cuts going away for good.  If necessary I can live with the sequester.  What I can not and will not support is cuts to entitlements just so rich bastards, military industrial complex bloodsuckers can get theirs.  Enough of that.

    No more compromises with republicans.

    No to chained CPI.

    No to raising Medicare retirement age.


    See that us progressives can be as unyielding as the other side and you' ll thank us years from now for standing up to this contrived disaster capitalism.

    "The real wealth of a nation consists of the contributions of its people and nature." -- Rianne Eisler

    by noofsh on Tue Jan 01, 2013 at 03:27:23 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site