Skip to main content

You may remember the awesome diary by Meteor Blades about the treatment of Native American Lakota children in Foster Care and how they end up there.
South Dakota kidnaps Indian children and sticks them in white foster care

Daniel Sheehan, Lawyer for the Lakota People's Law Project, as well posted an Action Alert diary about this issue:
ACTION ALERT: Help Stop Unlawful Seizure of Lakota Children in SD.

The issue was covered in depth by the NPR report, you can listen to here:
Native Foster Care: Lost Children, Shattered Families

Now there is one case of sexual child abuse of a Lakota child  - the Mette case - going to trial on Monday. I received the email below and this short diary is just an effort to spread the word and possibly get it covered by someone, who can do it better than me. You may as well donate to the cause. Read the email I received this morning below. Thank you.

Next Monday, January 7, two South Dakota state employees who risked their jobs to punish a rapist of a Lakota foster girl are being put on trial for crimes they didn’t commit. It’s part of an effort by state authorities to prevent anyone from exposing corruption at the Department of Social Services.

Here’s the background on the trial: last year, Brandon Taliaferro and Shirley Schwab—an assistant state attorney and court-appointed child advocate, respectively—discovered that two teenage Lakota foster sisters in Aberdeen, SD were being sexually abused by their adoptive parent, Richard Mette. Brandon and Shirley encouraged the girls to tell the truth about the abuse, and now Richard Mette is serving a 15-year prison sentence for child rape.      

As in so many cases, the girls are Lakota children who were taken from their homes by the state and placed in non-Native foster care instead of with family members—all in direct violation of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).

After an NPR report in October 2011 exposed rampant violations of ICWA by South Dakota’s Department of Social Services (DSS), state authorities responded by attacking critics from within. That’s the real reason that Brandon and Shirley are being put on trial. They uncovered evidence that the Lakota girls were being abused and saw first hand that DSS refused to investigate. When they accused the state of discriminating against Lakota children and families, the state charged them with “unauthorized disclosure of confidential information” and “witness tampering.”

Will you help us get media and observers to the trial next Monday by forwarding this message to your networks? And will you pressure the House Committee on Natural Resources (Indian Affairs) to get involved by sending a short note in your own words to Rep. Ben Lujan (D-NM) here? (Be sure to include the case #: CR 10-11-13; Fifth Circuit Superior Court of South Dakota).

Our executive staff will be present at the trial, along with other "Official Observers." Please join us if you can! 



WHEN: Monday, January 7th at 9:00 AM
                                 WHERE: 5th Circuit Court, 101 SE 1st Ave in Aberdeen, SD


Pilamaya (Thank you),



The Lakota People’s Law Project Organizing Team

PS: To learn more about the Mette sexual abuse scandal, see these two published articles:
1) 100 Reporters;

2) Lakota People's Law Project Special Report - Justice as Retaliation - How the State of South Dakota is Attempting to Punish Lakota Child Welfare Advocates and Protect Child Abusers - The Mette Case

Originally posted to mimi on Fri Jan 04, 2013 at 09:00 AM PST.

Also republished by Native American Netroots, Invisible People, and Barriers and Bridges.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site