Skip to main content

I have been a serious cyclist now for almost as long as I have been an educator, about thirty years. One of my favorite films, which I showed each year I taught high school English, is Breaking Away, a 1979 fim based on the real-life mania for cycling by the main character, Dave Stoller (Dave Blase) and the Little 500 bicycle race held at Indiana University.

Along with the focus on the love of cycling, the engaging and rich characters, and the heart-warming humor, the film is also a dramatization of America's pursuit of a meritocracy, the plight of the working class, and the promise of education.

"I Want Some American Food, Dammit! I Want French Fries!"

Breaking Away is a story at its core about family and friendship in Bloomington, Indiana, where the limestone quarry industry was disappearing and Indiana University sat before the four main friends of the film like both a promise and a curse.

Dave, Mike (ex-high school quarterback), Cyril, and Moocher are recent high school graduates drifting into adulthood. They still identify with the "cutter" working class community their families depended on, but feel the pressure to move ahead, possibly attending college.

Dave's father Ray, once a "cutter" but now a used car salesman, finds himself unable to connect with Dave, who has fallen in love with cycling and Italian culture. The dynamic between Ray and Dave highlight the generational tensions faced in twentieth century America—where the working class was disappearing, college was becoming a necessity and not an avenue for the elite, and American culture was blurring with international culture.

With his future in question, Dave resorts to working at his father's car lot, while his friends also struggle with entering the adult world and leaving the idyllic quarry behind—a quarry that has become a swimming hole for the young adults and holes signifying the loss of a livelihood for the adults, working class Americans abandoned by the American Dream.

Dave confronts several harsh lessons including trying to find time to train on his bicycle while also working (in one scene he rides rollers in the rain just outside the lot offices) and experiencing the shattering of his idealized Italian professional cyclists (who shove a frame pump in his spokes during a hard-to-fathom appearance at a Bloomington bicycle event).

Cycle race --- Image by © Royalty-Free/Corbis
Along with the family tension among Dave and his parents as well as the unraveling of the four young men's friendships, the film also explores the heated conflict between the locals, the "cutters," and the university students—the inequity between the working class and the privileged.

The fighting between the "cutters" and the students reaches a fevered pitch, resulting in the "cutters" being allowed to race in the Little 500, against the fraternity members most negatively portrayed in the film.

It is at this concluding scene of the film that I want us to focus.

Equity, Not Equality: The Meritocracy Imperative

Participation in the Little 500, at least the film version, requires two things: Teamwork and every participant riding the exact same Roadmaster bicycle.

In the real-life event, Dave Blase rode away from the field, but in the film, Dave Stoller struggles against a crash and injury and pulls off a last-second victory. These details are far less important, I think, than how this simple and inspiring film tells a story of the possibility of meritocracy within a cautionary tale of the crumbling working class in the U.S.

The film's meritocracy theme includes the need for teamwork, even within the competition paradigm, but most important of all, the film highlights the need for opportunity and equity.

The university officials step in and create the opportunity for the "cutters," erasing the privilege advantage of the fraternity-only event. The guidelines of the Little 500 also demand equity—all riders on the same bicycle.

Once opportunity and equity are established, then the possibility of meritocracy exists. While the film confronts equity, many Americans wrongly confuse the need for equity with the dangers of state-imposed equality.

Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron" offers a story of equality: "The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal."

Side by side, Breaking Away and "Harrison Bergeron" represent the great American failure to seek equity and the need to stop confusing equity with equality (Vonnegut's satire is a nuanced look at the tyranny of both forced equality and rugged individualism).

As poverty and the working poor expand, as the working class and middle class disappear, and as the privileged pool their capital on the backs of all the rest while creating an ever-widening gap between the have's and have not's, Americans are cautioned to consider the realities of equity and opportunity as well as what steps must be taken to achieve the meritocracy because like the fraternity members of the film, the ruling elite do not want equity and opportunity, do not seek a meritocracy—as these would all bring to pass the possibility that Dave Stollers everywhere would be allowed to break away from inequity.

As the film shows, competition sorts; it doesn't create equity. The American commitment to competition and choice are commitments to sorting, not equity.

In order for life's necessary sorting to be fair, then, a just society committed to democracy and individual freedom must insure opportunity and equity.

Without equity and opportunity, one of the fraternities wins the Little 500. With equity and opportunity, the "cutters" win and genuine merit is rewarded.

The problem is not that we have sorting, but the conditions within which that sorting occurs.

The film ends with Dave also having an opportunity to enter college, the promise of education in the pursuit of meritocracy.

In the current culture of education reform, a series of policies ignoring equity and opportunity while perpetuating sorting mechanisms and entrenching inequity further, Americans need to consider priorities: Equity and opportunity first, choice and competition to follow.

Originally posted to plthomasEdD on Sun Jan 13, 2013 at 06:00 AM PST.

Also republished by Education Alternatives.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Nice diary (4+ / 0-)

    Moocher can be seen at present as the VP of the confederacy in "Lincoln." I looked at him for a while thinking he looked familiar and then thought, "That's Moocher!"

    I watched Breaking Away a few months ago, probably for the first time since it came out. As you say, does a good job dealing with a lot of complex themes around class and becoming an adult. It also has a lot of humor. The fight scene in the cafeteria with the runaway bowling ball is one of my favorites.

  •  Love this movie (3+ / 0-)

    Thanks for bringing it all back to me. I never realized it was based on a true story.

    I think it's great that you shared this with your students. Hopefully they learned all those lessons from the movie you wanted to share with them, and more.... Like how guys wore tight white cut-off short-shorts in the 1970s and it was considered fashionable!  

    Young Dennis Quaid, Daniel Stern, Barbara Barrie -- and a great soundtrack!

    "My mother always taught me they can have their own opinion but that doesn't mean they are right." -- Marcelas Owens

    by Mad Mary on Sun Jan 13, 2013 at 07:05:05 AM PST

  •  One of my favorite movies (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    plthomasEdD, slapshoe

    A must-see for anyone who love to ride a bicycle and, as you've ably demonstrated, a terrific and very subtle lesson on what is wrong and what is right with our culture.

    Cycling has changed a great deal since Breaking Away was made. I for one would never even consider getting on a bike without first donning a helmet.

  •  My mom discovered this (0+ / 0-)

    when it came out in 1979, and dragged me to see it (I wasn't that enthused about a biking story), and of course it proved to be delightful. We even got a copy of it on videodisk, if you can imagine. Several years later, I was in the process of choosing a graduate school, and settled on Indiana University. I'd totally forgotten that that was the location of movie until a bike enthusiast classmate suggested we watch it--then it hit me, "OMG, it's THAT school!"  My best friend and I still quote lines from the excellent script all the time--"REFUND??"

    I thoroughly enjoyed my years in Bloomington--although Little 500 weekend was an annual cross to bear, fraught with public drunkenness and destruction.

    "I believe they talked of me, for they laughed consumedly."--George Farquhar

    by slapshoe on Sun Jan 13, 2013 at 09:47:07 AM PST

  •  Actually I was one of the extra's in the crowd (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Originally the director felt that he could have the old 10th Street Stadium filled with students but only a few hundred showed up so he had move us around for various shots, but the net effect was they had to make tight shots on the actors and simulated race making the movie better. I also knew the two high powered blond sorority girls featured in the crowd shots, they were AlphaPhiOmega, PiPhi or PhiOmega, can't remember, but they epitimized the Greek class system's attitude.

    Lil' 500 truly originally based on a class system where in its roots frat's having the more and better resources to train and recruit competitive riders, but as the growth of equity emerged in the dorms and a few independent's things actually became more interesting. Though in the late '70's during "College's Greatest Weekend" I enjoyed the contrary event called "AssKickers" which was basically a music-marijuana-kegger festival on a hill side out of town.  There were a few times in the mid '70's when genuine bicyclist athletes formed an independent team and competed. Also my cousins were riders for a top ten dorm floor team and later became tri-athletes and bicyclist amateur competitors.

    As for the larger question, we have witnessed class creep and institutionalized inequity and inequality settle into the US society, both at a micro level and at larger scales.  What I also see is when things don't go as expected for those on top, there constantly seems to be a corrupted accountability process, where those who cause the problems end up rewarded or made whole, but those affected actually pay for the problem. This is prevalent be it corporate, let look at Hostess, or United Airlines or Too Big To Fail or where ever.

    This is a bigger issue than people think and what was underneath this flawed value system is that the class system rises all boats, yet I am seeing many boats sinking while they are on liners.

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty~Ben Franklin

    by RWN on Sun Jan 13, 2013 at 09:54:33 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site