Skip to main content

When politicians discuss their support of gun control, they all seem to follow a specific script.  They (especially if male) talk about the guns that they own, their love of the 2nd Amendment, the role of guns in their family history, etc, etc.  It is a form of rhetorical in-grouping---linking their identity with that of the audience with whom they want to communicate (the "responsible" gun owners, as they would probably say).

It is fascinating to see just how regularly politicians heap praise on the 2nd Amendment---even when they may ignore other parts of the Constitution quite regularly.

Anyways, the lovefest around the 2nd Amendment got me thinking about another one of our amendments, the 21st Amendment--that which repealed Prohibition.

I wonder if, when politicians were creating or strengthening drunk driving laws, they delivered paeans to the 21st Amendment--maybe like this:

"I am and have always been a strong champion of our 21st Amendment rights.  I, myself, enjoy drinking alcoholic beverages--whether a glass of red wine with dinner or beer while watching a [Fill in local team name] game.  My family members all drink and drinking is deeply rooted in the culture of my family, and the culture of my constituents.  With the common sense legislation on drunk driving that we need, we are not taking away the ability of law-abiding, responsible adults to enjoy a drink.  However, we need to find ways to sensibly balance our 21st Amendment rights and the needs of public safety."

The trolls may or may not have been worse.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  The difference is that the 21st Amendment... (0+ / 0-)

    ...doesn't establish alcohol as a right.

    Rather, it explicitly leaves open the space for states and territories to make laws regulating and even banning alcoholic beverages:

    The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.
    There's nothing in the 21st Amendment that says anything about alcoholic beverages as a right. The 2nd, for better or worse, does explicitly describe keeping and bearing arms as a right.

    "When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist." --Dom Helder Camara, archbishop of Recife

    by JamesGG on Sun Jan 20, 2013 at 02:15:06 PM PST

  •  I am not entirely certain what your point is (0+ / 0-)

    unless it is to make fun of the way some politicians artificially generate their positions on the 2nd.  In this case, I would say it is generally well deserved.  My experience is that they usually try to walk a middle line with them and your right, couch it in terms of some family tradition.  

    As of right now, I sit here reading DKos, responding to this thread and enjoying some bourbon, thanks to my 21st amendment rights and  contemplating on the fact that as with all rights its needs to be handled responsibly.  Right off the top of my head, I can easily say the same thing about the right to speech and the right to vote and the responsibilities associated with being part of the jury system.

  •  To me it says (0+ / 0-)

    they really don't want to be like the senators and representitives that got fired when their base turned on them in the election following the last assault weapons ban.

    It happened here we voted out our very own speaker of the house. We are pretty much a democratic state.

    It is the heart that makes a man rich. He is rich according to what he is not what he has -Henry Ward Beecher

    by PSWaterspirit on Sun Jan 20, 2013 at 07:16:56 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site