Skip to main content

Seneca Falls, Selma, Stonewall. The three sites of progress toward civil rights for everyone that the President cited in his wonderful inaugural address yesterday. Hearing it made me sit up straighter (pardon the expression) and brought me to tears. I was watching with Steveningen, and we just looked at each other in amazement, because this IS the first time that the rights of lesbians and gay men have been mentioned in this way on a national stage. Each of these events is like the others  because they each have come to symbolize a liberation movement. However, a discussion of how these like events differ in details is worthy. Each event provides significant support to the idea that CIVIL RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS, and these events also provide some very similar messages, specifically, that asking politely doesn't always produce results.

Below the great orange friendship circle:

So these events.  Each came at a different point in the struggle for the rights of the group involved and each group has come closer to full American citizenship as a result of the event. In the order in which they were mentioned, which happens to be chronological.

Seneca Falls

As we learned in my diary, US Since 1865: The Seventy-Year Struggle to Give Women the Right to Vote, the first conference in support of women's rights anywhere was an outgrowth of the antislavery movement insofar as a number of women, most notably Elizabeth Cady Stanton (pictured to the left) and Lucretia Mott, decided to construct a conference around Mrs. Mott's skill as an orator July 19-20, 1848 at the Wesleyan Methodist Chapel in Seneca Falls, New York, in the heart of the "burned over" district of religious enthusiasm in upstate New York.

The conference produced a Declaration of Sentiments which included 15 clauses that enumerated the repeated injuries and usurpations women have endured from men throughout history, and the assembly voted on each one. #1,

He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise.
was considered especially extreme, and this was the only resolution produced by the convention that was not ratified unanimously. THESE included #s 2 and 3.
He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice.

He has withheld from her rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded men--both natives and foreigners.

What were its effects?  Well, it didn't prevent Congress from sending out the 14th Amendment, which introduced gender into the Constitution for the first time, and when women decided to contest the 15th Amendment, the Supreme Court ruled in Minor v. Happersett (1875),  that the right of suffrage was not a necessary attribute of national citizenship, affirming that the Fifteenth Amendment forbade only disfranchisement by race, and this led to major abuses in the registration of freedmen who now could be discriminated against based on education or income. We'll explore that further when we get to Selma.

After that, it took another forty years for women, most notably Alice Paul, to mount a concerted effort to secure the vote. This effort had little of the gentility of Seneca Falls or even of Carrie Chapman Catt's political maneuvering in the Westen states. The first women's picket line went up at the White House on January 10 1917, and Alice Paul kept up media interest in it well into 1918.

By the time the United States entered World War I April 7, 1917, nineteen states had given women the right to vote and New York was voting on a referendum which passed by 140,000 votes. As the picket lines went on, Wilson became increasingly annoyed with them and on September 4, thirty women were arrested and sentenced to a workhouse.  Three days later, one of Wilson's oldest political backers resigned as collector of the Port of New York to protest the treatment of the women. Even Alice Paul was arrested and jailed late in October, where she began a hunger strike and was fed forcibly. The suffrage prisoners were released in late November.

Congress convened December 4, and the House voted on suffrage January 10, 1918, passing it 274-136. The Senate stalled until June 27 (Why? Several states had by referendum rejected women's suffrage, and some Senators didn't want to go against the will of those states to impose suffrage on them), when they decided not to vote on the amendment during that session. On August 6 48 women were arrested outside the White House and given light sentences. The Senate finally voted at the beginning of October 1918 and failed to reach the 2/3 required by two votes. FINALLY, after more demonstrations and more arrests, this time in Boston, the Senate passed the amendment June 4, 1919. The  19th Amendment became law August 26, 1920.

But that was just VOTING. Forty years after women gained the vote, it took a book by Betty Friedan about the discontent women who had done men's jobs during World War II and/or had been educated felt about their place in American society, and another six or seven for women in the New Left to understand that their concerns were being subordinated to those of the men in the movement. We'll leave it here, because it took part of the resolution of the movement represented by Selma to move things along for women.

Selma

The event that began at the Edmund Pettis Bridge in Selma, Alabama March 7, 1965, and ended in Montgomery, the state capital, eighteen days later, marked the culmination of the Southern Civil Rights movement and resulted in the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which our Supreme Court will be reviewing in the spring to see if we have indeed reached a post-racial society (I can hear our Black Kossacks snickering here, and I'm snickering with them).

Culmination of a movement that began on a short-term basis with the Montgomery Bus Boycott in December 1955 but which has roots in the events described in the movie Lincoln, most notably the Emancipation Proclamation and the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, ONE HUNDRED years before Selma. In the interests of time, we'll look at the very short term, and to put it simply, the events which led up to Selma were the terrorism of white Southerners (yes, I know about Hodding Carter and Dean Smith and Ralph McGill and the Siegenthaler family, and I know that more than half of the White South didn't harbor virulently racist views, but all it takes is a few people dressing in sheets and burning crosses to tar an entire group of people with the same brush) and the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as a memorial to John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

An aside about the Civil Rights Act of 1964. You know about Strom Thurmond's filibuster, but that wasn't the only thing Southern Congressmen did in their attempt to scuttle the bill, although the jury is still out on the motivation of Howard Smith, D-Virginia and rabid segregationist, who added "sex" to the categories against which discrimination was forbidden. The bill passed with "sex" in it, and that led to an Equal Rights amendment which was scuttled by people like Phyllis Schlafly who warned that women would lose their "special" position in American society and that we'd have unisex bathrooms.

Anyhow, Selma happened because, even though the Civil Rights Act of 1964 had ended legal (de jure) segregation, African Americans in the south were still being deprived of the right to vote. This was evident in a floor fight at the 1964 Democratic National Convention between the white Mississippi delegation and the Black Freedom Democratic slate, which the white slate won. From a new textbook, Exploring American Histories: A Brief History with Sources:

After [Alabama] state troopers shot and killed a black demonstrator in February 1965, Dr. King called for a march . . . to petition Governor George Wallace to end the violence and allow blacks to vote. Local law enforcement officers answered their peaceful protests with arrests and beatings. On Sunday, March 7, as black and white marchers left Selma, the sheriff's forces sprayed them with tear gas, beat them, and sent them running for their lives back to town. A few days later, a white clergyman who had joined the protesters was killed on the streets of Selma by a group of white thugs. On March 21, after another failed attempt to march to Montgomery, King led protesters on the fifty-mile hike to the state capital, where they arrived safely four days later.
See also smokey545's diary, My family's experiences with Martin Luther King at the Selma Civil Rights March.

Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act August 6, 1965, and, five days later, the Watts district of Los Angeles went up in flames. Why Watts? Black Los Angeles had been redlined into this area. The country learned about de facto segregation over the next three summers as riots happened after police confrontations in Northern black communities (the riots in Newark and Detroit in 1967 were particularly severe), and riots took place upon the assassination of Dr. King as well. The civil rights movement for white people was superseded by anti-Vietnam agitation, and younger members of the Civil Rights movement like Stokely Carmichael began to discuss Black Power. Now, forty-five years later, of course, we have a mixed-race president who identifies as Black, but racism has in no way been vanquished.

Stonewall

Not really the ORIGIN of the gay liberation movement -- see my diaries The Los Angeles context for Harry Hay and the Mattachine Society and Gay Liberation and Identity Politics: The Case of California -- but the event that the newsmedia and popular culture CONSIDER its origin. Previous efforts on behalf of LGBT (for convenience I'm being anachronistic) rights had been mostly (the riot at San Francisco's Compton's Cafeteria, for instance, is a dramatic exception) very decorous : the late Frank Kameny and the late Barbara Giddings insisted on jackets and ties for men and skirts and stockings for women at demonstrations. Stonewall, however, was a flashpoint event.

On June 27, 1969, the patrons of the Stonewall Inn on Christopher Street in Greenwich Village decided not to put up with a police raid. The blockquote, to show you how far we've come, is from the aarp.org website.
While the police waited for patrol wagons to cart away the arrested suspects and the seized alcohol, the bar’s patrons began to resist. They refused to follow police orders. Men refused to show their IDs, and men dressed as women refused to accompany female officers to the bathroom to have their gender confirmed.

Those who weren’t arrested exited through the front door, but they didn’t go far. Within a short time, the crowd swelled to an estimated 2,000. As police put the arrested into the wagons that were now on the scene, the crowd threw what they had—pennies, beer bottles, trash cans—at the police and shouted, “Gay power!”

Thirteen people were arrested, and four police officers were injured at Stonewall.

The riots continued for six nights.

The resistance wasn’t planned, nor were the riots that followed.

“Every movement arrives at a moment when people say, ‘Enough is enough,’ ” says Michael Adams, executive director of Services and Advocacy for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Elders, or SAGE. “That was the Stonewall riots for the gay rights movement.”

And so it was. The big moment, of course, came in 1973 when the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the mental illness categories.

So forty years later? Damn.  If I think back to 1971, I couldn't have imagined ANY of this. I mean, if I think back to 1986 (only twenty-seven years ago), at the heights of the AIDS epidemic, when the Supreme Court announced Bowers v Hardwick, I couldn't have imagined any of this. MAYBE ten years ago, with Lawrence v Texas, but then there was DOMA. Nevertheless, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire, Iowa, the District of Columbia, New York, Maine, Maryland and Washington State would recognize my marriage now, and we can serve openly in the military if we want to. Similarly, the Lilly Ledbetter Act goes a LONG way to ending the pay inequity which keeps women's rights from being the same as men's rights.

And, the best thing. An African-American president, associating the three events to acknowledge that the struggles of women, blacks and LGBT people, although different in the manner in which these struggles have played out, have all been for the same thing, civil rights. One BIG shehecheyanu coming up, and thank you, President Obama, for the acknowledgement.

Originally posted to History for Kossacks on Tue Jan 22, 2013 at 02:19 PM PST.

Also republished by Remembering LGBT History, Barriers and Bridges, and LGBT Rights are Human Rights.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site