Skip to main content

By Richard Kirsch, originally published on Next New Deal

President Obama's second inaugural moved past a vague message of compromise and charted a progressive course toward the future.

Four years ago, I stood in the cold listening to President Obama’s first inaugural address. I remember it leaving me cold. This year, in the warmth of my den, the president’s clear projection of progressive values as core American values warmed my heart.

I just looked back at Obama’s first inaugural address to see why I found it so disappointing. The speech starts by acknowledging the crisis of 2008, with the economy collapsing and war raging. As required, the president says that America is up to the challenge. The address includes a short list of progressive points on the economy, climate change, and the role of government. But these are interspersed with acknowledgments of the validity of conservative arguments. There is no unifying, values-based narrative or vision.

What a difference from yesterday's address, which starts with the promise of the Declaration of Independence – we are created equal in the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness – and then unabashedly extends that to the struggle for civil rights, which Obama has often shied away from being seen as championing. He grounds our 200-year history “through blood drawn by lash, and blood drawn by sword," reminding us that "no union…could survive half-slave, and half-free.”

From there, the president charges directly to the historic role of government in building our physical and human capital. And unlike four years ago – when he first trumpeted the role of free markets and then noted the need for regulation – he says unambiguously, “Together, we discovered that a free market only thrives when there are rules to ensure competition and fair play” and that “a great nation must care for the vulnerable and protect people from life’s worst hazards and misfortunes.”

Even when the president recognizes values shared by progressives and conservatives – skepticism that about central authority and the importance of initiative and personal responsibility – he quickly affirms that “preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action.” To meet the future, the president says, will take the kind of things government does – educate children, invest in infrastructure – declaring, “Now more than ever, we must do these things together, as one nation and one people.”

From there he makes it clear that our economic success is undermined when “a few do very well and growing many barely make it.” Instead, "America’s prosperity must rest upon the broad shoulders of a rising middle class. We know that America thrives when every person can find independence and pride in their work, when the wages of honest labor will liberate families from the brink of hardship.”

Obama then begins to build a bridge linking the dignity of the individual with the collective, which he expands as his address progresses. The first span of the bridge is to connect the prospects of a “little girl born into the bleakest poverty” with freedom and equality “not just in the eyes of God, but also in our own.” He continues to build the bridge, insisting that in updating government programs, we should aim to “reward the effort and determination of every single American.” He then makes it clear that this includes keeping the “commitments we make to each other through Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security,” which “strengthen us” and “do not make us a nation of takers. They free us to take the risks that make this nation great.”

The president then puts forth a values-based linkage of government's role in tackling climate change, refuting climate deniers and linking addressing climate change to our “economic vitality” and natural “national treasure.”

Reaching to a preacher’s eloquence, the president affirms that he is not leaving anyone behind in our national journey. The cadences of “our mothers and daughters can earn a living equal to their efforts," “our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law,” “no citizen is forced to wait for hours to exercise the right to vote,” “immigrants who still see America as a land of opportunity,” and “children from the streets of Detroit to the hills of Appalachia to the quiet lanes of Newtown” resound with the voice and spirit of Dr. King. The president has built a bridge that links individual initiative and responsibility to oneself and each other with a values-driven role of government that unites our diversity on the American journey.

Progressives need to pay close attention to another bridge Barack Obama has built here. He has integrated often separate strains: identity politics and the politics of government playing a key role in building an economy based on equal opportunity. The more we link those, the more we will create a story about America that commands a lasting majority.

No progressive story of America would be complete without putting movement at its core, which the president does forcefully in his alliterative embracing of “Seneca Falls and Selma and Stonewall.” Notably, these reminders come at the end of his discussion of our role in the world, as he links American movements to Dr. King’s proclamation that our individual freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on earth.

He doesn’t leave the call for action in the past. His concluding paragraphs clarify that “You and I, as citizens, have the power to set this country’s course.”

The president will need lots of help setting that course over the next four years; surely he’ll be tested to keep to it himself. Our job is to do everything we can to assist him.

Richard Kirsch is a Senior Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, a Senior Adviser to USAction, and the author of Fighting for Our Health. He was National Campaign Manager of Health Care for America Now during the legislative battle to pass reform.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  A couple of Canadian jounalists' comments on (0+ / 0-)

    the inaugural address. The first closes on the same note as the diarist's.  Americans need to demand their politicans deliver what the majority clearly voted for, including the majority popular Democratic vote for the House of Representatives, bolstered by more recent polls.  A Canadian poll the day before the presidential election indicated 83% would  have voted for the President, 9% for Romney

    I thought the address was superb.

    "...stories of past courage can define that ingredient..... But they cannot supply courage itself. For this each man must look into his own soul." JFK Profiles in Courage " Ontario

    by ontario on Tue Jan 22, 2013 at 11:30:52 AM PST

    •  the writer didn't like Obama's speech much (0+ / 0-)

      said he lost his (rhetorical) voice since before his initial election and compared him negatively with our "great" Presidents.

      Maybe I have my head in the sand but when did their become a consensus (as the writer intimates) that the US is in an "irreversable decline".
      When did that happen?

      •  (ie writer of your first linked article) (0+ / 0-)
        •  I think what Coyne was saying was that Obama, (0+ / 0-)

          the 2004 and 2008 campaigner, let his eloquence slide and replaced it.  The second columnist, Cohen, said:

          Some suggest that Obama has had to accommodate himself, and his style, to the gritty, granular work of legislating in Washington, which speaks the hard, unsentimental language of the bureaucracy. In fact, a former aide told the New York Times that he took notice when Obama began using “impact” as a verb — as if that was the end of the president’s eloquence. Power is about decision making, not soothsaying.
          But, in that sense, he has  rebounded so very well with this speech. as the first writer Coyne says:
          It was focused, blunt and unequivocal, the most full-throated defence of liberalism in an inaugural since FDR's second, to which it bears some resemblance:

          Gun control and immigration reform, each a major political challenge on its own, had already been teed up, along with the sweeping changes to the tax code and entitlement programs that are envisaged as part of a budget deal. To that already crowded agenda the inaugural has added action on climate change

          He is about to put the hammer down, in other words, and for that he will need all the enthusiasm from his supporters he can possibly muster


          Reading the two in context together, I get the overall message that those who had expressed conern that he had let progressives down, now have renewed hope and commitment from the President - I take it that way. And, he needs their full, active support.

          "...stories of past courage can define that ingredient..... But they cannot supply courage itself. For this each man must look into his own soul." JFK Profiles in Courage " Ontario

          by ontario on Tue Jan 22, 2013 at 06:23:48 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  guess you have to read both then (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:

            becauese reading the one concludes that Obama just doesn't measure up in eloquence to what he used to be and to our great past orator Presidents. That is what it concludes and read alone it doesn't seem to back up your main idea, FYI. I suppose if you already have read both it's harder to tease that out from what you now sum total view is.

            •  Another favourable columnist today (0+ / 0-)

              From a prominent friend and supporter of former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, a Progressive Conservative. Very favourable.


              "...stories of past courage can define that ingredient..... But they cannot supply courage itself. For this each man must look into his own soul." JFK Profiles in Courage " Ontario

              by ontario on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 10:11:32 AM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  glad. I was heartened and relieved by (1+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:

                his speech, myself, as a progressive. But also admittedly as someone who's resting in that very safety net (having fallen into it a few yrs ago due to illness/injury).

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site