Skip to main content

In this week's parsha, Exodus 13:17-17:16, we get a daring escape, a song of victory, a day of rest, a great food, and perhaps a bit of genocide on the side.  For the bonus round, we get another song of victory, including uses for common household items you may never have thought of.  Oh, and we're also celebrating Tu B'Shevat, the New Year for the trees.  How does all of this fit together?  Read below the orange squiggle to find out.

In last week's section, the Israelites were allowed out of Egypt, and received a series of commandments that taught them how to observe the first Passover.  Navy Vet Terp, in his excellent diary, discussed the moral issues found therein: how can God, who is supposed to be omnipotent, choose to kill off the Egyptian first born?  Why did he need to?  Unfortunately, he never found an answer.  Fortunately, however, this week's reading has a very different progression: first God's power, then God's power assisting man, and finally woman (actually, two women) taking matter into their own hands.  Let's explore each of these occurrences in order.

When the section begins, God sends the Israelites via a fairly circuitous route.  For anyone looking at a map, the natural route from northern Egypt to the land that God is promising will become Israel (the ancient one) is by the Mediterranean Sea.  It's no longer than any other route, it avoids having to cross bodies of water (something nigh impossible for the 600,000 people described in various places in the Bible, and difficult even with a smaller number), and you're on the coast, so you have access to fishing and to sea breezes.  Granted, the Sinai is hot, but the Sinai is hot no matter what.  Yet God orders the Israelites to avoid going that way,

פֶּן-יִנָּחֵם הָעָם בִּרְאֹתָם מִלְחָמָה--וְשָׁבוּ מִצְרָיְמָה
Lest the nation repent when they see war--and return to Egypt (incidentally, all translations here are mine, unless otherwise noted.  And the language sort of demands the use of the word "lest," despite it sounding a bit dated."
The Philistines, also known as the Sea Peoples, fought a number of battles with the Israelites later in the Bible, and historically fought a number against the Egyptians as well.  It is the Philistines, located in what is today Gaza, that God is telling them to avoid.

The fascinating thing about this passage is the worry about regretting the Exodus and returning to Egypt.  If you've read the Bible before, you know that on many occasions the Israelites had precisely that regret (in fact, they'll have it in this parsha shortly after the splitting of the sea).  Moreover, the worry is war- we'll see later on in this parsha that the Israelite do fight a battle, albeit with God's help.  But in Numbers, the Israelites refuse to fight their way into Canaan and lose the chance to go in for 40 years.  And the same thing happens on a smaller scale in the haftorah, the additional portion referenced above.  God's fears seem fairly well justified.  It's worth noting that at this point, all the agency is God's- the people are not involved in pushing forward.

Jumping a chapter, the Israelites find themselves pushed up against the sea, with Egyptian chariots bearing down on them.  They immediately do just what God warned of- they lament leaving Egypt.  God therefore continues to take matters into his own hands, and splits the see for the Israelites, closing it only as the Egyptians are inside of it.  God again repeats his earning of glory (for the discussion of the moral issues there, see Navy Vet Terp's diary from last week, linked above).

The rabbis, however, were not satisfied with this explanation.  In the Talmud, Sotah 36b-37a, a story is told, in the course of a debate, that the different tribes were debating who would go into the sea first.  Rabbi Judah says that Nachshon ben Aminadav, who is later listed as the prince of Judah, jumps in, and then the sea split.  The verse that Rabbi Judah quotes Nachshon as saying is literally a verse about drowning, implying that Nachshon jumps in before the sea has split.  This is, in some ways, the beginning of human agency in the story of redemption from Egypt (except perhaps the midwives at the beginning of the book).  Moses does plenty of things, but his actions are generally at God's command, and God is insistent when he kills the first borns that he is doing it himself.  Here, Nachshon jumps in, and then God splits the sea, in part to save him.  Note that this doesn't appear in the Bible, but the Rabbis felt some human agency was required.

After being saved, the Israelites sing a song, celebrating their salvation.  This song, written in a poetic form.  In it they celebrate God's saving them, and say a number of things about God's prowess in battle.  Of note are the references to kingdoms that show up later in the Bible (though many have been referred to earlier), like the Philistines, Moabites, and Canaanites.  In some ways it would seem a little odd to find this here, and a number of Biblical critics point to this as evidence of later authorship.  Also worth noting is that the women are also singing, along with Miriam.  That will become more significant as we discuss the haftorah.

The Israelites are very upset that they are now without food and water.  They complain substantially, still not willing to take up a role in their own redemption.  God shows them a well and sends them food, letting them know that they will get a double portion before the Sabbath.  They complain mightily, wanting everything handed to them.

And then we get to the latter part of chapter 17.  In this section, starting with verse 8, the Amalekites attack the Israelites.  It's not mentioned here, but Deuteronomy, in relating this story, says that the weakest among the Israelites were the ones attacked.  The Israelites now have to fight, and yet another level of human agency is gained.  But the Bible isn't willing to have this be a fully human war: when the hands of Moses are raised, Israel wins, and when they are lowered, Amalek wins.  Ultimately, though, the Israelites prevail.  As evidence that this is not a purely human victory, God then says to Moses:

כְּתֹב זֹאת זִכָּרוֹן בַּסֵּפֶר, וְשִׂים, בְּאָזְנֵי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ:  כִּי-מָחֹה אֶמְחֶה אֶת-זֵכֶר עֲמָלֵק, מִתַּחַת הַשָּׁמָיִם.

I'm going to use the 1917 JPS translation, which is both accurate and poetic in ways I could never hope to be: Write this as a memorial in the book, and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.

A few verses later, Moses says that God will war with Amalek from generation to generation; one of the commandments for Israelites is to wipe out Amalek.  The rabbis twist this somewhat, as by their time there were no Amalekites.  They end up saying that Amalek is not only a nation but also a mindset, and that those who wish to wipe out the Israelites join Amalek.  This has a whole different set of moral implications, which should probably be dealt with in detail elsewhere.

Thus far, we've had God's agency in leading the Israelites away from the Philistines, a bit of human agency (according to the rabbis) in splitting the sea, and yet more in fighting Amalek.  The haftorah (Judges 4:4-5:31), however, the additional portion from the prophets, moves this agency yet again towards that of men...or rather, women.

In this story, Deborah the prophetess reminds Barak (meaning lightning...the name is the same as in Ehud Barak, and not Barack Obama, who says his name derives from baruch, blessing), who is a war leader in Israel, that he's supposed to go fight a Canaanite king.  Barak isn't willing to do so, because he's scared, unless Deborah, who presumably has God on her side, will go with him.  And Deborah warns him that if she goes, he won't get any honor, because God will turn over the Canaanite General Sisera to a woman.  They go off to fight Sisera, and God does something to the chariots, which allows Barak to win.  Note that God is still involved here, but reduced to essentially a saboteur; the fighting is done by people.  Sisera, who runs off in defeat, goes to the tent of Heber the Kenite.  Heber, however, seems to be out, and Sisera is invited in by his wife, Yael.  He asks for water, and instead he is given milk; exhausted, he falls asleep.  The bible then tells us:

וַתִּקַּח יָעֵל אֵשֶׁת-חֶבֶר אֶת-יְתַד הָאֹהֶל וַתָּשֶׂם אֶת-הַמַּקֶּבֶת בְּיָדָהּ, וַתָּבוֹא אֵלָיו בַּלָּאט, וַתִּתְקַע אֶת-הַיָּתֵד בְּרַקָּתוֹ, וַתִּצְנַח בָּאָרֶץ; וְהוּא-נִרְדָּם וַיָּעַף, וַיָּמֹת.

And Yael, the wife of Hever, took a tent peg, and took a hammer in her hand, and went quietly to him, and drove the peg into his temples, and it pierced the ground.  And he was sleeping heavily, and swooned, and died

Up come Deborah and Barak, chasing after Sisera, and Yael invites them in to show them Sisera (literally, she tells them to come in, and she will show them the man they are looking for).  After seeing this, the Bible praises God, and then Deborah sings a song, relating the events in poetic form, as with the Song of the Sea.

So, what can we draw from this?  Many things, but I think one of the most important is human agency.  Over the course of this sequence, we go from God doing everything to God being praised, and helping, but people doing the work.  And we start moving from a world in which the moral dilemma of God killing people moves towards a world in which God intervenes only minimally.  Even while recognizing that we "did not build that," the note is, in fact, that we work together to build things.  Never fully on our own, as the Israelites need help from Nachshon and Barak requires Yael's aid, but little by little, we can wipe out the memories of intolerance and push into a world where anyone, even a woman in a patriarchal society, can take matters into her own hands.  And in case that still feels like too much of a violent message, it's worth noting that we recently celebrated Martin Luther King Day- a day celebrating a movement where human agency, by someone in a disadvantaged position, could battle hatred and intolerance with words and with the support of people.  Similarly, in an era of global climate change, we can use the Sabbath as a day to consider the value of nature and the ways in which we can save it.

Of course, Dr. King felt that God was on his side, and that comfort didn't hurt.  We have to continue pushing, though, as God's actions only come through our modern day people who dare to try.
Shabbat Shalom

Originally posted to JLan on Thu Jan 24, 2013 at 06:20 PM PST.

Also republished by Street Prophets , Elders of Zion, and Community Spotlight.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  What fascinates me about Deborah (8+ / 0-)

    Is almost at the end of the poem, Sisera's mother is waiting for her son to come home from the war, looking out the window wondering why her son is late coming home.

    My mother was an Army nurse in World War II and served in some of the worst hell, and unfortunately now the mostly forgotten hell, in New Guinea.  When I was a small child she was the commander of her American Legion post and she would drag me every few months to memorial services for the war dead.  Some of the most poignant memories of my childhood are the Gold Star Mothers rising at the end of the interfaith services, and, as the buglar played Taps, they would cry up a storm for their lost sons.  Their sons were heros, Sisera was supposedly a bad guy but other than being the enemy I don't know why - Judges doesn't have him doing anything bad - but somehow the end of the poem of Deborah makes me think of these Gold Star Mothers.

    "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals, now we know that it is bad economics." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jan. 20, 1937

    by Navy Vet Terp on Thu Jan 24, 2013 at 06:50:44 PM PST

    •  I've always found it ambiguous (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eowyn9, SchuyH, ramara

      Sisera's mother is waiting for her son and talking about all the spoils he'll bring back.  I go back and forth between whether I think she actually thinks that (in which case there's not a whole bunch of sympathy) and whether I think she's just making excuses because she doesn't want to know the truth (which is all the more depressing).

      •  That's why there is a group (4+ / 0-)

        of Israeli and Palestinian mothers who have lost sons in the conflict, who now work for peace. They speak in schools, for example. Some things are universal.

        In high school I read a book called "Last Letters from Stalingrad." It was made up of the actual letters home from both sides, when many soldiers realized they could die. The letters both show similar feelings of young men thinking of mother and home when they feel they might never see these things again. It made a big impression at the time.

        Republicans want to make government small enough to fit in your vagina..

        by ramara on Fri Jan 25, 2013 at 09:42:54 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

    •  Also, Deborah is apt reading this weekend (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      quarkstomper, TheDuckManCometh

      After the Obama administration ended the discrimination against women soldiers from serving in combat.  Deborah did it thousands of years ago, my mom in New Guinea in World War II, and it's been a reality in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals, now we know that it is bad economics." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jan. 20, 1937

      by Navy Vet Terp on Fri Jan 25, 2013 at 01:32:28 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Rec'd, tipped, shared, thanked. n.t. (3+ / 0-)

    "Are you bluish? You don't look bluish," attributed to poet Roger Joseph McGough, for the Beatles' Yellow Submarine (1968).

    by BlueStateRedhead on Fri Jan 25, 2013 at 09:34:21 AM PST

  •  The natural evolution of this (0+ / 0-)

    "change of agency" theme would be that finally the humans realize that they are the only real agents of change in the world, and that gods are non existent and not necessary (and pretty unhelpful too).   What people do in this world is their own. There is no "God" pulling the strings or "acting through" them.

    When we all realize this and move beyond these texts and the beyond belief in gods, we will accomplish so much more.  

  •  Where "God" ends (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Amber6541, Navy Vet Terp

    and where "people" begins... is there a line separating the two?

    I wonder...

    Inspiring post. Thank you.

    "Corruptio Optimi Pessima" (Corruption of the best is the worst)

    by zenox on Fri Jan 25, 2013 at 02:28:22 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site