Skip to main content

I feel like I shouldn't even need to explain this.

On their website the Family Research Council recently posted an article about how they're marking the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade with the headline Life Begins At 40. I glanced at the piece:

For four decades, families have traveled over miles of wintry highways in the hope that their trips to Washington, D.C. will someday end--and with it, one of the darkest periods of... Okay, yeah, whatever, crazy people with the carnage posters. But your message here is not getting across. Because "Life Begins At 40" doesn't sound like a slogan. It sounds like a really serious policy change. It sounds like instead of trying to meet the feminists of America halfway, you've just leapfrogged over them and run straight into some morally dark territory. I was thinking it was maybe some intern's error. Someone would catch it. And then the president of the FRC, Tony Perkins, tweeted it. So I had to reply.

"Killing a 39 year-old is still homicide in my book," I tweeted at him. He hasn't gotten back yet.

Dear FRC: Here's why you're capable of saying and writing unfortunate things like this. It's because you're not really listening to yourself. You're not hearing how awful you come across sometimes. Like when you refer to demonstrations against same-sex couples in France as a "new French resistance," portraying gay people who want to get married as Nazis. Or when you produce this pamphlet on how to argue against abortion in cases of rape and incest. Or when you equate Planned Parenthood with slave owners in the South. When you do this you reveal that you don't care if there's any connection whatsoever between your rhetoric and the terrible policies you want to inflict on the powerless in our society.

You say whatever you think will work.

Sometimes the results are - and I really mean this - wonderful.

(NOTE: You've heard about the GOP vote-rigging, but did you know about the connection to Big Coal? I started following the money and wrote about it here.)

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  The freakin' FRC is too loathsome for words (0+ / 0-)

    "Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

    by Diana in NoVa on Mon Jan 28, 2013 at 03:43:29 AM PST

  •  There is some cognitive disconnect in the (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    historys mysteries, Pandoras Box

    binary brains of the Cons. They perceive reality in pairs, two by two, but the parts are antagonistic and never merge to become one. They are self-centered and their whole environment is permanently antagonistic towards them. So, they feel, they have to defend themselves.
    I almost wonder if they experienced the womb as a prison from which they barely escaped alive and this accounts for their resentment of that space.
    If we were to research it, perhaps we'd find that most of the people consumed by angst when it comes to reproductive issues were what we call "difficult births" whose mothers never let them forget the desperate straits she went through to give them life.

    Children sometimes have funny ideas. Our second child used to think he was unwanted because he was born fourteen months after his sister. I had to tell him that, if he hadn't been wanted, he wouldn't have been born. I'm not sure that was entirely satisfactory, but it's the truth.

    We organize governments to deliver services and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Mon Jan 28, 2013 at 05:04:27 AM PST

  •  We need to stop arguing about abortion (0+ / 0-)

    Seriously. You will never change anyone's mind. Ever. People are sternly divided into two discreet camps: you believe life begins at conception or you believe life begins at birth. There is no overlap. There is no arguing. If you believe life begins at conception, then killing a 6 week old child is the same as killing a 40 year old man. This view is demonized by many as being insane, but truthfully it is, and has been upheld by classical argument authors as, the more logically consistent of the two positions (note that logically consistent doesn't necessarily mean correct).

    So here's what I propose: instead of trying to convince pro-lifers that abortions are great, try and convince them that it's none of the federal or state government's business to know what kind of potentially life-saving operation a doctor performs on a woman. We should not be in the business of outlawing medicine. Keep in mind, most pro-lifers these days are self-proclaimed "libertarians". Watch them twist up and have to justify their two positions that are at odds.

    You have a much better chance of progress with this angle, trust me. I'm pro-life to the core. I believe life starts at conception. But abortions are sometimes necessary to save the life of the mother. It's an unfortunate reality of life. Having state laws on the books that restrict access to abortions makes the life-saving medical procedures more difficult to perform.

    I also accept that some people disagree with me and that it is a potential gray area. Just because I personally would never want my wife to have an abortion does not mean I think I'm infallible and that no woman should have an abortion ever under any circumstances.

    It is possible to be pro-life and support women's reproductive rights. My belief's prove it.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site