Skip to main content

I recommend you read the full article The Great Gerrymander by Prof. Sam Wang [http://www.nytimes.com/...]

Wang adds up all the votes for Democrats and Republicans in a state's various Congressional districts and compares the statewide party percentages with the proportion of Congressional seats which go to each party to see the impact of gerrymandering.  Wang says, "start with the na├»ve standard that the party that wins more than half the votes should get at least half the seats. In November, five states failed to clear even this low bar..."

"In North Carolina, where the two-party House vote was 51 percent Democratic, 49 percent Republican".  But the state's elected Congressional delegation was, "Four Democrats, nine Republicans".  51% of the votes resulted in 31% of the seats!  

"In the seven states where Republicans redrew the districts, 16.7 million votes were cast for Republicans and 16.4 million votes were cast for Democrats. This elected 73 Republicans and 34 Democrats."  In other words, Democrats got 49% of the vote [at least excluding votes for third parties] and got (almost) 32% of the Congressional seats.

In all, the Republicans made more of a difference for themselves in the 2012 election than Democratic gerrymandering, but both parties do gerrymandering and other tricks.  My first full-time job after college was in a city run by a Democratic political machine comparable to old Chicago.  That's probably part of the reason why we don't hear the Democratic Party making a bigger stink about what the GOP has done.  Still, regardless of whether the Democrats were motivated by civic desire to maintain majority rule or motivated by cynical desire to maximize the number of their own people in office, this should be a critical issue for the party.

There are a number of other mechanisms limiting true majority rule in the US.  There's the Electoral College in presidential elections, there are attempts at voter suppression or intimidation, about 1% of the voting age population are former felons (no longer in jail, probation or parole) denied the right to vote (see: http://www.dailykos.com/...), etc.  Unlimited spending by the rich to influence elections is also a critical issue.

Fair elections, fair districting, fuller freedom to vote and similar guarantees on democracy should be a top priority.  It should be a make-or-break question for any candidates you support and it should be a major effort between election seasons.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site