Skip to main content

Gopasaur
"Permanent" may be overstating it, but it'll be a long freakin' time before Republicans can win an honest majority absent a Democratic implosion.

There's the oft-mentioned electoral data—those vast demographic changes that are seeing the GOP's ability to win grossly compromised. Mitt Romney's strongest age demographic was seniors, his weakest was the youngest voters. The circle of life guarantees that Democrats will come out of that divide looking quite good. And of course, not entirely unrelated, is the rise of the Latino and Asian vote, as those young groups begin entering the voting age population in force. Remember, every month, 67,000 Latinos turn 18, while 100,000 (predominantly white and conservative) seniors die. Do the math.

Marco Rubio, sneaking in a sip of water during the State of the Union response speech
Their best hope?
On top of that, there's the GOP's escalating civil war between the party's crazy wing and its even crazier wing, none of which are popular with the public. I don't need to go out on a limb to predict that by the time the dust settles on Election Night 2014, that civil war will have cost Republicans at least one, probably more Senate seats. And with Republicans already fretting about a possible Rand Paul independent presidential bid in 2014 2016, don't expect a truce any time in the near future—not when one side is as ideologically rigid and uncompromising as the hardest Al Qaida elements.

For once, Democrats are (mostly) playing it well. Filibuster reform would've been nice, but congressional Democrats and the White House have congressional Republicans on their heels, and at each other's necks—from the debt ceiling and tax increase votes a month ago (which passed with a minority of Republican House votes and pitted Grover Norquist against the Club for Growth), to an immigration debate that is tearing Republicans apart from inside (pitting the likes of Sean Hannity and Marco Rubio against their party base). And how about the battle over Hurricane Sandy aid, pitting Southern Republicans in the House against Northeastern ones (and Gov. Chris Christie)? Or gun control, where Blue-state and suburban Republicans (like Illinois' Sen. Mark Kirk) will end up on the wrong side of their party's absolutist opposition to any regulations?

Republicans spent the last month working on "rebranding" itself, only to decide that their problem wasn't with the message, but with the marketing of that message. As if their billion-dollar message machine had suddenly malfunctioned, and that some additional message massaging would convince people to start mouthing nonsense about "freedom!" and "government dependency!" And for a party suddenly cognizant of their "branding" problems, they couldn't even offer a unified response to the president's State of the Union address. Instead, their two antagonistic factions had to both have their say.

And then, they proved they hadn't learned their lesson anyway by engaging in an unprecedented filibuster of a defense secretary nominee—because rather than be happy that one of their own conservative Republicans from the "heartland" would helm the nation's biggest agency, they decided to be offended instead. Because Obama. Proving that they are neither interested in governing nor getting elected.

That's not the hallmark of a serious party, and few are treating it as such anymore. How can Republicans heal their internal rift while remaking themselves as a palatable national party? They can't. Those two goals are mutually exclusive.

We are now entering an era in which Republicans can only win elections if they rig the system, like gerrymandering, or if Democrats lose. But until the Republican Party reforms itself, there's no way they win on the merits.

Originally posted to kos on Tue Feb 19, 2013 at 01:57 PM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Andrew Lazarus, SME in Seattle, Alumbrados, JWC, vicki, filkertom, Gooserock, Shockwave, OLinda, eeff, red moon dog, exNYinTX, jancw, Creosote, ask, pedrito, jennifree2bme, oceanview, splashy, Redfire, Texknight, wdrath, defluxion10, peterj911, lyvwyr101, xxdr zombiexx, Blueiz, Frank Vyan Walton, Gowrie Gal, vcmvo2, ExStr8, UncleCharlie, blueyedace2, dewtx, Dobber, reflectionsv37, fixxit, Beetwasher, Overseas, stevemb, most peculiar mama, Steve in Urbana, kaliope, spunhard, zinger99, RodSerling, Mr Bojangles, tac gman, luckydog, NBBooks, wild hair, philipmerrill, gpoutney, Libby Shaw, CTLiberal, thenekkidtruth, doingbusinessas, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, Thinking Fella, Tamar, fabucat, asilomar, Haningchadus14, hawaii2, offgrid, flumptytail, Dave in Northridge, sfbob, newpioneer, MI Sooner, martyinsfo, bobswern, leonard145b, gloryous1, TomP, gizmo59, Mighty Ike, rogerdaddy, bkamr, seriously70, misterwade, JeffW, BobBlueMass, JaxDem, GAS, amyzex, Involuntary Exile, bythesea, Its any one guess, jamess, Greasy Grant, Jeff Y, Gemina13, mattc129, Troubadour, ARS, LinSea, shopkeeper, elziax, kevinpdx, sfarkash, Railfan, Its the Supreme Court Stupid, smileycreek, Mokurai, FogCityJohn, fidellio, LOrion, renzo capetti, elginblt, ItsSimpleSimon, ericlewis0, dpwks, I love OCD, allisoneisall, slowbutsure, BlueJessamine, nickinnewyork, kevin k, PorridgeGun, sofa turf, VTCC73, Caddis Fly, disconnect the dots, SteelerGrrl, DEMonrat ankle biter, Mathazar, quill, hulibow, Inkberries, DeadHead, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, Chrislove, Siri, ahumbleopinion, a2nite, AreDeutz, Trotskyrepublican, Yonkers Boy, evilhoodedcrow, This old man, willrob, Buckeye54, dfwlibrarian, tytalus, Glen The Plumber, Linda1961, aresea, Yo Bubba, mindara, Icicle68, Smoh, ModerateJosh, IndyinDelaware, tampaedski, JustGiaco, NonEuclidian, Bunbun, Fulgour, H E Pennypacker, eagleray, maryannm, citylights

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site