Skip to main content

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal presages some rough sailing ahead for US military interests in the island Kingdom of Bahrain. Entitled A Palace Rift in Persian Gulf Bedevils Key U.S. Navy Base, it highlights growing public evidence of discord between two branches of the Al Khalifa royal family.  Although this isn't my area of expertise, I will link to what I understand are some critical news items and leave it to the discussion/comments section for those more knowledgeable than I to contribute.

The Al Khalifa royal family, according to wikipedia:

profess Sunni Islam and belong to the Utub tribe that migrated from Najd to Kuwait in the early 18th century. The Utub tribe is part of the larger Anizah tribal confederation. The current head of the family is Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, who became the Emir of Bahrain in 1999 and proclaimed himself King of Bahrain in 2002. As of 2010, roughly half of the serving cabinet ministers of Bahrain have been selected from the Al Khalifa royal family,[3] while the country's only Prime Minister, Khalifah bin Salman al-Khalifah, (serving since independence in 1971) is also from the Al Khalifa family and is the uncle of the current King.
Fellow Kossacks will recall the Day of Rage two years ago this month, when on February 14, it was reported that:
Rubber bullets were fired into peaceful crowds. The government... tried cash payments to buy off the country's Shi'ite majority ahead of today's protests, which took place under the name "Day of Rage."
So began the Bahraini uprising:
Protesters in Manama camped for days at the Pearl Roundabout, which functioned as the centre point of protests. After a month, the government requested troops and police from the Gulf Cooperation Council, which arrived on 14 March. A day later, the king of Bahrain declared martial law and a three-month state of emergency.[26][27] Pearl Roundabout was cleared of protesters and the iconic statue at its center was destroyed. After lifting state of emergency on 1 June, the opposition party Al Wefaq organized several weekly protests[28] usually attended by tens of thousands.[29] One of their marches organized in 9 March 2012 was attended by over 100,000[30] and one of their recent on 31 August attracted tens of thousands.[31] Daily smaller-scale protests and clashes continued, mostly outside Manama's business districts.[32][33] By April 2012, more than 80 people had died during the uprising.[34]
A year later and things hadn't calmed down much:
(Reuters) - Formula One cars took to the track in Bahrain on Friday, while the government, hoping for a successful Grand Prix, squared off against activists determined to mark it with "days of rage" after more than a year of Arab Spring protests.
One item that went under-reported in most of the Western press during this period (and, as far as I can tell, wasn't picked up by anyone here at DK) was the identity of the particular "forces" behind this repression:
DUBAI (Reuters) – Hardliners in Bahrain’s Saudi-backed Sunni Muslim ruling family may dig in their heels after a Formula One Grand Prix debacle that spotlighted a frustrated pro-democracy uprising instead of projecting an image of stability.
The above Reuters piece quoted a Qatar-based researcher on Bahrain, who pointed the finger at the royal court and defense ministers:
Those ministers, full brothers from a family branch often known as the Khawalids, are widely viewed as masterminds of last year’s crackdown, which cut short a dialogue Crown Prince Salman had begun with the opposition on democratic reforms.
Today the Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) reported that:
Since the 14th of February 2013, which marked the 2nd anniversary of Bahrain’s pro-democracy movement, protests against the government have increased in different areas around Bahrain. The BCHR documented many cases of severe injuries inflicted by government forces. Other injuries have proven fatal and lead on the 14th of February 2013 to the death of Hussain Ali Ahmed Abrahim: a 16 year-old teenager killed by shotgun wounds in several areas of his body.
This all brings me back to the Khawalids branch of the Royal Family and the Wall Street Journal piece I cited in the introduction, which (unfortunately) is behind a paywall.  It cites a UK expert on Bahrain as saying that the Khawalids are engaged in a huge battle to control the family.

According to the Independent,

Reports from Manama suggest the takeover of the Royal Family by the so-called “Khawalid faction” has become so successful that Bahrain’s chief allies in London and Washington are beginning to fear that the normally pro-West monarchy is being usurped by a group with virulently anti-American and anti-British views.
The above cited Qatar-based researcher on Bahrain, has accessed the WSJ article and expresses the following:
...the most interesting thing about the WSJ article is not the analysis of the Khawalid per se, which those following Bahraini politics have been writing on for some time...  Rather, the surprising bit is that a "senior" member of the ruling family was willing to give an interview to a Western journalist wherein he complains that "surrounding the king are all powerful Khawalids."  While he is not named, one presumes that this individual lies within the crown prince's camp, bringing into the open the sort of fight that has been playing out behind closed doors since the very beginning of the uprising.
I suggest going to his blog to get more background on this (as I am no expert on the subject).  I'll close by citing the Independent, once more:
Khawalid is a term used in Bahrain to describe an ultraconservative faction within the Royal Family who trace their lineage back to Khaled bin Ali al-Khalifa, who in the 1920s was the powerful younger brother of the then Emir. He led a brutal crackdown against a Shi’a uprising and was imprisoned by the British. His supporters were known for their intense dislike of the island’s majority Shi’a population and spent much of the late twentieth century outside the corridors of power.
The Independent cites a Carnegie Endowment for International Peace report which states that:
Much of the kingdom’s political power resides in a conservative triumvirate comprised of Prime Minister Khalifa bin Salman al-Khalifa, Royal Court Minister Khalid bin Ahmad bin Salman al-Khalifa, and the commander of the Bahrain Defense Forces Khalifa bin Ahmed al-Khalifa—with the latter two being brothers, part of the al-Khawalid branch of the al-Khalifa family.

Originally posted to maracatu on Fri Feb 22, 2013 at 06:54 PM PST.

Also republished by Adalah — A Just Middle East and Community Spotlight.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  from memory I had the impression Saudi (6+ / 0-)

    security had broken up the demonstrations very brutally and that the alleged ringleaders rounded up and imprisoned.

    It is my impression that this intrusion by the Saudis into their neighbors' affairs is based on two considerations, the first being the desire to not have any more Yemens on their borders.
    The second is that it is a part of their proxy war with Iran to retard the development of a Shia' crescent and to retard Iran's development as a regional power.

    Bit off topic but the Saudis have their own internal problems with complaints from a nascent middle class that there is no opportunity in the Kingdom.  For example, housing is in short supply as the royals and their cronies (such as the bin Ladens) control the construction industry.  Even if a non royal were to start a project, would it appear to be desirable, one of royals would be able to take over as most of the cash in the kingdom is funneled to support the lavish style of the extensive royal family        

  •  Really interesting piece, maracatu. (4+ / 0-)

    It's always nice somebody takes the pain of lining up the ducks. I've learned something today.

    Many thanks

    I deal in facts. My friends are few but fast.

    by Farugia on Fri Feb 22, 2013 at 07:38:16 PM PST

  •  Thanks for the update (5+ / 0-)

    Bahrain has an interesting role in the Arab-Muslim world.  It is largely seen as the "Las Vegas" of the area, because alcohol is permitted - unlike in dry countries like Saudi Arabia.  On the weekends, the roads are packed with expensive, careering black SUVs filled with Saudis there to...well, kind of let loose.  Saudi women who can't drive at home often will drive in Bahrain - easy to pick out; they are not very experienced or road-savvy!  They do a lot of shopping at the luxury stores in the malls and generally enjoy a much more relaxed lifestyle.  It seems Bahrain is largely accepted as a temporary "getaway" from their more observant Muslim home.

    There is a long causeway between the island of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, and the general thought is that it was built with the understanding that Bahrain would be able to call in the Saudi military if they ever needed backup - which is exactly what happened in response to the popular uprisings.

    The unrest, sparked by the Arab Spring, had its roots in the very disparate social and economic treatment of the Shi'a majority population in Bahrain.  The government let them protest for a while without making any changes, and then when the protests grew more "violent" and disruptive - burning tires, gunfire, etc. - brought in the Saudi tanks and quickly quelled the protests.  Checkpoints, closed areas, and prominent military presence in the streets of Manama have been routine ever since, along with varying levels of protest activity.

    The government - rather surprisingly- asked for an independent commission to review the situation and make recommendations, and I believe did implement some of those recommendations in an attempt to placate the Shi'a population.  However, they will never let the Shi'a be fully equal, or they (as the minority) would lose power.

    There is also of course the complication of the enormous foreign military presence in the small country, because of the long history of the kingdom's pro-British/US politics, its largely stable and Western society (in addition to the thousands of US and foreign military and dependents there, there is also a large Western expat community), and its tremendous strategic location/value.  No matter how out-of-hand the protests might get, or how unpopular the government response may be, there is a tacit understanding that the US is extremely reluctant to pull out of this center of operations in the region.  In fact, in the midst of all this unrest, the US commenced a large expansion of their base and port facilities there.  The Iranian threat and the overall balance of power in the region is very important to the US military, and Bahrain is at the center of that.

    I had not heard - though am not entirely surprised - about the rumored Khawalid influence.  It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

    •  According to Justin Gengler's link to (4+ / 0-)

      Frederic Wehrey (May 31, 2012):

      In this climate, the recent decision by the United States to resume weapons sales to Bahrain, intended to shore up the pro-reform Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad al-Khalifa, has had the opposite effect, encouraging royal hardliners, who see a new normalcy in U.S.-Bahraini relations. The arms transfers have placed al-Wifaq further on the defensive and provoked a new turn toward anti-Americanism from the February 14 Youth Movement.

      "Do not judge your neighbor until you walk two moons in his moccasins." Cheyenne

      by maracatu on Sat Feb 23, 2013 at 03:22:04 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks for the diary (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Aunt Martha, MichaelNY

    I've republished to Adalah/Justice in the Middle East.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site