Skip to main content

A war is brewing between AFSCME's District Council 33 and Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter that Sean Collins Walsh of the Philadelphia Daily News says "could change the nature of labor negotiations across the state." Following stalled contract negotiations, Mayor Nutter first wanted the Common Pleas Court to allow him to force a new contract onto the thousands of blue-collar workers represented by District Council 33, and subsequently made a special request to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court with the same goal in mind.

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter
Michael Nutter
Nutter has said that there's no point in continuing negotiations because no agreement will be reached. But if the PA Supreme Court ruled that mayors and other elected executives can unilaterally determine that labor negotiations cannot end in agreement and impose their proposal onto the union, wouldn't that call into question the future of collective bargaining and unionization in Pennsylvania as a whole?

President of District Council 33 Peter Matthews thinks so, and is now comparing Mayor Nutter to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker who killed collective bargaining for most public unions in his state and referred to collective bargaining as an "expensive entitlement."

Matthews says of Nutter, "He's gone full Scott Walker on public-sector workers," and, "This is the Scott Walker of the East. ... You have a Democratic mayor who's coming out against unions." Speaking at a press conference, Matthews also said, "Mayor Nutter has now escalated the dispute between District Council 33 and his administration. He has broken off negotiations, even though District Council 33 remains willing to continue talks, and gone outside of the collective bargaining process in search of a PA Supreme Court ruling allowing him to impose his 'last best offer,' thereby violating over 40 years of collective bargaining rights granted to all public sector unions in Pennsylvania."

Peter Matthews
When I first read about this I thought it might be hyperbolic, but really, if Mayor Nutter got what he's seeking from the PA Supreme Court there would necessarily be a drastic power shift against the unions in how collective bargaining works in PA.

In another piece, Sean Collins Walsh wrote that the last time a Philadelphia Mayor attempted to impose contract terms on a union it was Ed Rendell, and then a Commonwealth Court ruled in favor of the union and the Supreme Court did not take on the case, letting the pro-union decision be the final word on the subject. Walsh also points out that the lawyer defending DC 33 now was also part of this earlier case.

Another good sign for DC 33 came when they were backed up by other unionized public employees across the state. From Bob Warner of the Philadelphia Inquirer: "Lawyers representing close to one million Pennsylvania workers - including virtually all unionized government employees, from highway laborers to teachers - have joined Philadelphia's largest municipal union in asking the state Supreme Court to reject Mayor Nutter's bid to impose contract terms after a four-year standoff. ... The law firm Willig, Williams & Davidson filed a friend-of-the-court statement on behalf of 17 labor organizations, including the Pennsylvania AFL-CIO, the Pennsylvania State Education Association, the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, and AFSCME District Council 47, a smaller group of Philadelphia city employees. D.C. 47 spokesman Bob Bedard said the collective union membership totaled roughly one million workers."

As much as Mayor Nutter and his spokespeople deny that he's going after collective bargaining in general despite the clear implications of his request, it's no longer the DC 33 president making that contention alone, all of public-sector unionized labor across Pennsylvania has his back.

Originally posted to ProgressivePatriotPA on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 02:47 PM PST.

Also republished by DKos Pennsylvania and In Support of Labor and Unions.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (10+ / 0-)

    Mere passive citizenship is not enough. Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from those who are aggressive for what is wrong. - Fighting Bob La Follette

    by ProgressivePatriotPA on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 02:47:29 PM PST

  •  Decrepit cities aren't diversified states. (4+ / 0-)

    They have concentrated high need and very limited ability to tax well-off commuters.  That doesn't make Nutter's approach right by any means, but the idea that he's a Walker--who does it out of pure spite, not even to save money--is ridiculous.

    You know, I sometimes think if I could see, I'd be kicking a lot of ass. -Stevie Wonder at the Glastonbury Festival, 2010

    by Rich in PA on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 03:31:40 PM PST

    •  I agree that he probably doesn't have the personal (4+ / 0-)

      animosity towards unions that Walker has, but if he got the ruling he wanted from the PA Supreme Court, it would have a big anti-union impact statewide regardless of his personal ideology.

      Mere passive citizenship is not enough. Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from those who are aggressive for what is wrong. - Fighting Bob La Follette

      by ProgressivePatriotPA on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 03:38:43 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well, my position is the same as with all... (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        BachFan, sebastianguy99

        ...those anti-Rahm diaries we get around here.  What's the alternative for Philadelphia that doesn't depend on the magical power to tax people who don't live there?

        You know, I sometimes think if I could see, I'd be kicking a lot of ass. -Stevie Wonder at the Glastonbury Festival, 2010

        by Rich in PA on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 06:08:20 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Must protect collective bargaining. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ichibon, ProgressivePatriotPA

    The right of collective bargaining must be protected in this state and across the country. The mayor must be willing to open the books of the city's budget to the representatives of the union. So, they can see the truth about the city's finances. And then make a decision if they should make any changes to their contract proposal. Everyone must be willing to work for what is best for the city.

    •  Absolutely. (0+ / 0-)

      They should be able to reach a sensible agreement without a new PA Supreme Court ruling that allows executive branch officials to declare that negotiations can't work so their proposal must be forced on the union(s).

      Mere passive citizenship is not enough. Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from those who are aggressive for what is wrong. - Fighting Bob La Follette

      by ProgressivePatriotPA on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 05:30:51 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Huh... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ProgressivePatriotPA
    In another piece, Sean Collins Walsh wrote that the last time a Philadelphia Mayor attempted to impose contract terms on a union it was Ed Rendell, and then a Commonwealth Court ruled in favor of the union and the Supreme Court did not take on the case, letting the pro-union decision be the final word on the subject. Walsh also points out that the lawyer defending DC 33 now was also part of this earlier case.
    More reason I don't like Ed Rendell.

    Why Nutter, why?

    I would rather spend my life searching for truth than live a single day within the comfort of a lie. ~ John Victor Ramses

    by KayCeSF on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 05:20:20 PM PST

    •  Indeed. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      KayCeSF

      I was honestly tempted to go on a little mini-rant where I mentioned his name, but decided it would be too off-topic. Still, I agree with you.

      Mere passive citizenship is not enough. Men must be aggressive for what is right if government is to be saved from those who are aggressive for what is wrong. - Fighting Bob La Follette

      by ProgressivePatriotPA on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 05:29:08 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  On the other hand, Nutter was pretty righteous (0+ / 0-)

    in his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, regarding the proposed assault weapons ban:

    The time for political courage is now... How many more children, how many more police officers do we have to lose? ... The idea that these [assault] weapons are for self defense, based on our experience, is completely absurd.
    He's not the perfect mayor -- but he's not a villain, either.

    "Specialization is for insects." -- Heinlein

    by BachFan on Thu Feb 28, 2013 at 07:27:13 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site