Skip to main content

Yes, Antonin Scalia is bored to hell with being an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Hence the trollish dicta (hat-tip: Rachel Maddow) ejected from his pie hole during oral arguments these days. Having failed to become Chief Justice he now wants to out-Rush Rush Limbaugh.

Tony is a very smart guy. Smart enough to know that post Bush v. Gore his Originalism schtick is no longer taken seriously. Moreover, the question can and perhaps is being raised as to whether Scalia ever bought-in to Originalism as opposed to merely using it as intellectual cover for out-and-out reaction.

Originalism has always been nonsense. In a continent-spanning nation sporting computers, jet aircraft, television, and instantaneous global communication, the milieu out of which today's Constitutional issues arise, saying that the Constitution can only be interpreted by figuring out the original intent of an 18th century mind is bullshit. As any competent historian will aver, you never obtain a lived understanding of the historical actor's times, you but understand your epoch's reconstructed documentary approximation of that time. An historical understanding has both more and less information than the lived understanding of the historical actor and hence does not establish equivalence to it. Even if you nail the sought after reconstructed-understanding, its relevance to the case at hand is often a stretch at best.

But Originalism is a brilliant dodge that has served Tony well. For to refute Originalism and not seem to simultaneously be attacking the founders is nigh on impossible. So originalism was Tony's way to stand athwart the path of history and yell stop. But with Bush v. Gore, I believe, Tony's ambition to become Chief Justice consigned Originalism to the dustbin of history.

An apolitical Scalia of 2000 should have told the plaintiff in Bush v. Gore that nothing in the Constitution nor Federal law, sans racial discrimination via the Voting Rights Act, allows a Federal court to tell a state how to handle an election. And had the plaintiff been Al Gore, I'm sure Scalia's vote and voice would have said as much in an eye-blink. But in voting to make Bush president was Tony casting his own vote to become Chief Justice? What of his little controversial duck-hunting conversation in early 2005 with Dick Cheney? Did that have more to do with promoting himself as Rehnquist's replacement than the collusion with energy companies Cheney wanted to keep secret? Scalia couldn't have known the hunting trip would make news and create a stink strong enough to take him out of the running for Chief Justice when Rehnquist died that September. Yet when the youngish John Roberts was sworn-in as Chief Tony had to know the game was up. Originalism had been pissed away with no subsequent "Scalia Court" legacy as a replacement. So now as Tony looks to celebrate his 77th birthday on March 11th what is left but boredom and trolling?

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site