Skip to main content

Worker Victory at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
by Moshe Marvit
The Century Founation
Posted also at Blog of The Century

Last month, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) settled a massive complaint issued by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) alleging that the hospital chain routinely violated workers’ rights. This settlement marks a crucial victory for UPMC workers who have been trying to join together in a union to bargain for fair pay and working conditions—and a voice on the job.

UPMC responded to the workers’ efforts by attacking workers using unfair and questionable tactics. The NLRB charged UPMC with engaging in a series of unlawful activity, including firing and disciplining workers for taking part in union activity; telling workers they could not talk to their co-workers about the union in the hospital and even in public areas off the clock; telling workers they could not talk about the union in their own homes; unlawful surveillance and intimidation of workers; and discriminatory enforcement of company policies against workers who supported the union.  

Unfortunately, we have come to expect many of these tactics from large corporations, but not from a public charity, whose mission is to “serve our community.”  

UPMC’s answer to the Labor Board’s complaint tried to exploit legal loopholes and technicalities to avoid being held accountable for its attempts to silence workers. Most outrageously, UPMC argued that the workers could not bring a claim against it, because it has no employees. UPMC has long advertised itself as the state’s largest employer, with over 55,000 employees, so its claims that UPMC is in fact a holding company with no operations and no employees were rightfully met with skepticism—and some incredulous laughs.  

Again, we’ve come to expect these tactics from large corporations who hire teams of lawyers to find loopholes to evade their legal responsibilities, but not a public charity that receives hundreds of millions of dollars in tax savings from the region due to its charitable status.

Instead of dragging out the legal process at the expense of its reputation, UPMC has agreed to reinstate workers that were fired and suspended, restore their seniority status, give them 80 percent of their backpay, and clear their records. UPMC will rescind a number of policies that restricted workers’ right to stick together with their coworkers for fairness on the job. Managers will finally receive training on the rights of employees, and UPMC will post notices on bulletin boards throughout the hospitals stating that it will not violate the rights of employees.

That may sound like a lot of legalese, but the impact of this victory on UPMC workers and their families is very real. At the meeting announcing the settlement, one of the fired workers UPMC has agreed to reinstate, Frank Lavelle, spoke of the importance of what the workers at UPMC were doing. Lavelle, who has been with UPMC for 17 years before being fired, said that he grew up watching people fight for their civil rights and win against all odds. Now, with his children beside him at the meeting, he explained how important it was for them to see their father stand up for his rights and those of his co-workers, and win. Other workers chimed in, explaining that their struggle is about respect and dignity.

This victory is one step forward in what is certain to be an ongoing struggle for UPMC workers. However, it was significant because it showed that UPMC workers will stick together in the face of attacks, and that even the largest employer in the state has to listen to its workers if they speak with one voice.

And as UPMC faces increasing scrutiny for failing to live up to its charitable mission, that’s a lesson all of us in Pittsburgh would do well to learn.

Originally posted to Blog of the Century on Mon Mar 04, 2013 at 10:38 AM PST.

Also republished by In Support of Labor and Unions.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  respect (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    That's what it's all about. To respect means to look at again and not dismiss with a glance. Attention must be paid. That's very difficult for some people, especially people who respond to superficial optics, like predators being alerted by the movement of prey.
    However, while some people may be similarly limited in their ability to respond to other people, that is not a reason to organize society for their convenience. We should not cater to the sense-deprived any more than we should shut them out. If they can't relate well to other people, let them do something else. A hospital is no place for them.
    We can lay some blame at the feet of business schools which  have been training managers for decades to focus on the bottom line and treat all people, not just troops, as if they were fungible.

    We organize governments to deliver services and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Mon Mar 04, 2013 at 11:28:21 AM PST

  •  Nice to have some good labor news (0+ / 0-)

    Congratulations.. Keep up the good fight.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site