Skip to main content

We are now receiving the hard data.  Throughout the Charter versus Public School debate, the concern on one hand was that allowing Charters to compete, would force Public schools to close, and once done, the charter schools would perform no better than did the public......

In the '90's as these ideas were first proposed and debated upon their merits, but there was no evidence; it was all theoretical..  Now, we have actually  done it and are getting hard data....
Here is their history in one paragraph.  If a charter school opens up in a failing school system and the public money per student is allowed to follow that child, obviously parents at no cost to themselves will opt to put their children in a charter school.  Simply put, if their public school is rated  "F", the charter school can be no worse.  So the charter School being  someone's private  investment, now begins accepting children with public school money that comes from citizen's assessed property taxes... As more charter schools open up in that same failed district, they siphon even more public money into these private enterprises, pulling it of course  out of the public school system in that local area.  So the public school which was previously  failing, is now accepting a much lower number of students, yet trying to maintain the same infrastructure covering that wide geographical area..  For example, its school buses have to run the same routes whether they receive cash per student to carry 5 students or 35...  Obviously the public schools have to do with less, while the charter schools have to do with more... The charter schools choose their students in certain cases, and can send them back to public if they don't meet expectations.  The Public schools must take whomever is left.  Gradually the quality and sheer numbers of students deteriorate so much, that these public schools have to be shut down.  Too many schools are too empty and that is too costly...  Consolidation must occur.

Philadelphia and Chicago are closing schools.  And Guess what?  Most of both are black

The argument can be made that we are accidentally closing the door on the only one way a person can pull himself out of the inner city quagmire: with a quality education....

.

Now let us back up.  The argument for charter schools was that they would provide that door or that opportunity for these citizens to help pull themselves out. Theoretically,  if all charter schools had huge success stories, then this plan could be a viable option.
If such were the case, all of us including myself would be in favor of charter schools... As I look back over the past 20 years I can now see how we were seduced into allowing them to happen.  If someone had substituted the word  "private schools"  instead  of  "charter schools", no one would be against; we'd all be in favor..... private schools (which used private funds), competing with public schools would be a good thing.  People would have a choice if they could afford to let their children get a great education or a good one... I think Britain has functioned fine with its Eton School for Boys.

Then, when the argument became enhanced, that drawing such a line financially was not fair to underprivileged children who had talent,  a lot of us felt that yes  they should receive scholarships to go to good schools, and that was fair.  Then, when the lack of scholarships for the amount of private school openings became apparent, all were lulled into letting the public money for that child, follow the child where he wound up going... even if it was outside the school system and into someone else's private pockets....

Allowing public money to enhance private pockets, particularly in a urban environment where lots of potential students surround a converted building, opened up great possibilities for some to get wealthy...  Just a hundred students at $15,000 each per year, could bring one a gross of $1,500,000..  One could squeeze that few into  just three rooms of 35 students... Double that, and one gets $3 million.  Do it across the city, and gross $100 million....

So is it really that bad for someone to get wealthy IF... kids are getting a much better education?
And up to now, this was the dilemma .. No really had that answer because no one really knew.  No one had ever tried it before....

That was then.  We now have results and can analyze this experiment and see, once and for all, how charter schools can impact the growth and development of our children!... This is truly awesome, actually!.... .

In Philly, over a quarter of the district's 195,000 seats are now empty. That is 48,750 empty spots...  But more important, is the number of the remainder:  146,250...

In Philadelphia, the proportion of students attending charter schools jumped to 23 percent in the 2011-12 school year from 12 percent in 2004-5, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.

The actual number of Charter School Students  within the Philadelphia School District, according to the National Alliance for Charter Schools,  is 47,800... just 950 student shy of the district's empty seats........

Quite a coincidence!

In all 23.4% of Philly's children are enrolled in Charter Schools.... The district projects a 37 percent increase in costs associated with charter schools over the next five years, bringing the total charter cost to more than $800 million.... That will come out of the public school budgets.

Last year,  Philadelphia charters met AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) at only 29 percent, yet that was still better than the 13 percent tally for Philadelphia's district-run schools.....

Mathematically that stacks up thusly....

(0.13)146,250  +  (0.29)47,800  =  Total Philly students meeting  requirements....   The math gives us this many successful students:  32,874...

In 2005,  there were 185,000 students in the city district's public schools.  At that time, 34% were deemed advanced or proficient..... Doing the math we get this result.... 62,900.... actual students who were advanced or proficient...

In 2005,  the Philadelphia School District put out 62,900 students meeting standards.  In 2012, after experimenting with Charter Schools,  the same geographical area spit out 32,874 students meeting standards...

Conclusion.  Having  charter schools and public schools duke it out over scarce resources, not unlike the recent movie Hunger Games,  cuts our actual passing students down by  almost half....
We now have evidence.
EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I think you missed a couple of things. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    anonymous volanakis

    The drop in AYP at public schools between 2005 and now is pretty precipitous (went from 34% to 13%). You are attributing this to the impact of the charter schools on public school funding/enrollment. But Phil. public schools themselves say that in 2012 the test for AYP changed - it got much harder.

    Only 33 District schools, or 13 percent of the total, made the state standards, which became significantly tougher last year.
    And just last year, 2011, before the change in the standards, 110 District schools (or 43%) made the (old) standard.

    So really, all of the drop happened in the last year, when the standards, according to all sides, got a lot tougher. I really don't see a good case, in this data at least, against charter schools based on what has happened thus far.

    •  Actually (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      parkslopper50

      Multiple issues happened this past year.........

      1) The standards schools had to meet in order to hit “Adequate Yearly Progress” as measured by the federal No Child Left Behind law did get tougher.

      2) The district because of charters lost hundreds of millions in funding last year; there were two brutal rounds of classroom cuts.  That obviously factored in, too.

      3) Since the 2011 PSSAs were administered, a cheating scandal was exposed and for the first time, the state and district imposed unprecedented security measures - everything from forbidding teachers from administering test to their own students to requiring teachers and test administrators to sign documents acknowledging if they cheated they’d be subjected to criminal penalties.

      Particularly because of the cheating scandal and the obvious "teaching to the test" that was being done to inflate scores for the NCLB,  is exactly the reason why to make this comparison we went back to the days before NCLB and picked up 2005... when NCLB was just barely beginning....

      One can make an argument that scores tightened as did standards.  But, the reality exists that those in high school back in 2005 under the umbrella of public education, are by now 8 years later, graduated college and full time workers in the workplace...  Their education was successful.

      Yet today, we are closing schools.

      No matter where we arbitrarily draw the line of success as measured by test scores, the reality was that under the old program, twice as many students in the Philadelphia were deemed college ready, than there are now, under the split system involving Charters...

      I have to disagree with you that this piece of data, as a piece and not the whole, for the first time puts a damning shadow on the whole charter school program as it relates to inner city schools.....

  •  I will be moving into a new state soon (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    parkslopper50

    where I notice a few charter schools ranked in the top 10% are surrounded by "geographic" neighborhood schools ranked in  the bottom 20%. It seems at first blush that the charter schools are diverting resources from the "normal" schools at the expense of the "normal" schools.

  •  I read the Philly report... (0+ / 0-)

    ...at the linkyou gave. Here is the chart on page 3. (sorry if image hoster fails)

    It seems like all kids are getting better, not worse.
    •  Yes, unfortunately that is what happens.... (0+ / 0-)

      when you make the passage of a test, a teachers sole test of viability on whether she is fired or hired another year....

      In the comment above , I mentioned in the year 2012 which is off this graph, the Philly schools exposed a cheating scandal in which was behind those scores rising higher each year.  Then, in 2012, with adequate controls, the district scores plummeted 68%....

      As mentioned in a comment above, I used this chart to show the scores in 2005 as a base before the whole accountability to the NCLB test craze began, and before there was any need to cheat.

      I ended with the new totals based on the last testing which was secure, and also had no cheating.....

      The difference between the two should be a real number we can all count on...

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site