Skip to main content

Cross-Posted from the Boston Review.

Seventy thousand bridges in America are structurally deficient. Fixing this and other critical problems with our national infrastructure is a policy no-brainer.

In this year’s State of the Union address, President Obama unveiled his “fix it first” plan, a $50 billion program for repairing the nation’s roads, highways, bridges and transit systems. Although this is a step in the right direction, the plan should also meet the concerns of the newly emerging transportation-justice movement, about which we have heard nothing from the president so far.

The Obama administration last directed major funds toward infrastructure as a part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The government spent more than $31 billion, with a focus on “shovel-ready” projects.

By contrast, the new fix-it-first plan would spend most of the initial funds on sites that are “most in need of repair,” according to a summary the White House shared with the New York Times. A smaller portion, $10 billion, would go toward a national infrastructure bank. Finally, the administration has vowed to cut red tape and, according to The Hill, to “encourage public-private partnerships, leveraging the initial government funding to increase private sector spending on transportation.”

These proposals are a good start, but the plan should also be evaluated for fairness.

In fact the phrase “fix it first” originated with activists primarily concerned with fairness. These are community groups, faith-based organizations, labor unions, and other activists throughout the country who see themselves as part of a movement to ensure that public transit services meet the needs of the actual public. They are drawing attention to the fact that effective public transportation is a vital part of an integrated social justice agenda.

In the transit justice community, “fix it first” means that the government should prioritize maintaining existing roads and transit resources over spending money on widening roads or building new expressways that encourage sprawl.

That the administration has borrowed language of transportation advocates is a good sign. But it should go further. In this latest push for infrastructure spending, the message should not only be “fix it first” but also “fix it fair.”

How can we ensure that the interests of fairness are taken into account? I propose three criteria: infrastructure investment should embrace equity, both in its planning and in terms of the communities that it will benefit; it should provide good jobs; and it should increase competitiveness.

While we spend 1.7 percent of our GDP on transportation infrastructure, China spends 9 percent.

Equity demands that we avoid transportation mistakes of the past. In places such as Minneapolis and Oakland, plans for light rail have bypassed or priced out riders from poor neighborhoods. Similarly, light rail development in some communities has come at the expense of bus and paratransit riders—disabled and elderly riders who rely on specialized public transportation services. Such injustices occur when poor communities (both rural and urban), communities of color, and other groups that depend on public transportation are excluded from municipal planning and development.

Grassroots organizations have sprung up around the country to represent local interests and fight for transportation justice. It shouldn’t be difficult for policymakers to consult groups such as Community Labor United in Boston or Urban Habitat in the Bay Area and better serve all members of the community.

Second, President Obama’s fix-it-first policy offers an opportunity for government and the private sector to work together to provide a real boost to working families. Our standard should be clear: all new projects should guarantee workers family-supporting wages, good benefits, and proper health and safety regulations at worksites. Project contractors should also be required to hire from the local population. As the Transportation Equity Network has argued, “All major projects funded . . . [should] include community benefits agreements that ensure that low-income people, people of color, and women have a fair shot at the jobs created.”

Last but not least, a new infrastructure agenda should promote economic competitiveness. The importance of infrastructure to American business should make transportation funding a bipartisan cause. But it has become hostage to austerity and Republican intransigence.

The Obama administration has tried to structure fix it first so as to bypass Congressional gridlock. Instead, the White House plans to go directly to the states to map out the financing of repair and construction projects. This is the right idea. Congress is too dysfunctional to come up with a solution in time to save the most sensitive parts of our crumbling infrastructure, which is so clearly in the nation’s best interest.

We compete with China, India, Germany, and myriad other countries that have no trouble overcoming partisan strife to keep their roads, rails, and bridges in good shape. While we spend 1.7 percent of our GDP on transportation infrastructure, China spends 9 percent. Other countries also have strategic plans for future projects of national significance, while the United States has floundered without a blueprint.

Metropolitan transportation projects should also take a long-term view and focus on enhancing regional competitiveness. Transportation investment should include strategies for reducing carbon emissions and greenhouse gases, cutting down on traffic, and holding contractors accountable to employment and environmental standards.

Additionally, to push the country forward, we need a heavy emphasis on funding and planning for mass transit. A recent study from Infrastructure USA notes [PDF] that of America’s hundred largest metropolitan regions, only 30 have light rail or subway systems. A highway can only transport a fraction of the people a subway system can. Building new mass transit systems is a more efficient use of transportation dollars and will help attract more investment to a given region.

President Obama deserves our support in pushing for quick action to fix our nation’s roads, rails, and transit systems. But the administration can also do itself a favor by approaching fix it first from a transportation-justice perspective. A fair plan will help to repair America’s economy, alongside its bridges.

Originally posted to In Support of Labor and Unions on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 05:15 PM PDT.

Also republished by Keynesian Kossacks.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Dont use China as an example (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JeffW, Lily O Lady, YucatanMan, semiot

    China is a developing country, the US is not.

    The EU spends 5-6% - we used to spend 5-6% of GDP.

    That said 6% of GDP spent on infrastructure is nearly a trillion dollars a year and would create about 23 billion jobs.

    U6 is about 23 million people.

    Creating 23 million jobs would insure Social Security thru 2090.

    ...... Social Security blogathon March 25th thru March 29th. #HandsOffmySS FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 05:45:13 PM PDT

    •  Roger - just a nit (0+ / 0-)

      is there a typo in the sentence "....would create about
      23 billion jobs"? My guess is that it should read "23 million jobs".

      "let's talk about that"

      by VClib on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 05:53:45 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Multiplier is 2 to 2.5 (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        VClib, JeffW, YucatanMan

        So a trillion would create between 20 and 25 million jobs. Closer to 25m in a recession, closer to 20m in good economic times.

        so yeah, about 23 million..... around 23 million.....

        ...... Social Security blogathon March 25th thru March 29th. #HandsOffmySS FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

        by Roger Fox on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 06:13:02 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Ah, yes! The multiplier effect of infrastructure (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Roger Fox, JeffW

          expenditures in the local economy.  I believe the environmental documents I've been involved in have a similar multiplier for the economic impact section, as prepared by professional economists, with conservtive assumptions. Yes, we could fix out own stuff, AND build new needed stuff (we will NOT keep up with repairs of the old - thepopulation and needs have increased since those old items were built), and provide a LOT of employment.  Here, in the uSA.  

          Imagine that.

          I'm part of the "bedwetting bunch of website Democrat base people (DKos)." - Rush Limbaugh, 10/16/2012 Torture is Wrong! We live near W so you don't have to. Send love.

          by tom 47 on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 07:15:48 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  And right now, spending on infrastructure (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      semiot, Roger Fox

      would be a complete bargain, as interest rates are at record lows.  People are practically paying the USA to hold Treasury bonds.

       Spending on infrastructure now would have enormous payoff in the short term and longer term, plus be the cheapest possible price in years, due to the low rates.

       I really do feel it is criminal that we are not repairing our nation with advanced infrastructure to move into a greener future with the enormous opportunity we have at hand right now!

       And god knows we need the damn jobs. JOBS!  Hello, Washington -- wanna fix the budget deficit:  JOBS!  

      (apologies for shouting - they don't seem to hear very well)

      "The law is meant to be my servant and not my master, still less my torturer and my murderer." -- James Baldwin. July 11, 1966.

      by YucatanMan on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 10:02:50 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  What YucatanMan said +100 (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        YucatanMan

        ...... Social Security blogathon March 25th thru March 29th. #HandsOffmySS FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

        by Roger Fox on Fri Apr 05, 2013 at 08:00:45 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  We in rural California had created thousands (0+ / 0-)

        Good paying jobs, just through meeting  the needs of the medical marijuana clinics, all duly agreed upon through the vote of the people. And we didn't need governmental monies to do this.

        Then Obama's DOJ came in and smashed many of the dispensaries, so  that some six thousand of those jobs are now lost. But hey, the folks inside the prison industry need to know the prisons will be full!

        Offer your heart some Joy every day of your life, and spread it along to others.

        by Truedelphi on Fri Apr 05, 2013 at 03:39:55 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  TnR (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    lostinamerica, YucatanMan

    republished to Keynesian Kossacks

    ...... Social Security blogathon March 25th thru March 29th. #HandsOffmySS FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 06:14:39 PM PDT

  •  Arrow. Zing. Bullseye. A diary that needs... (7+ / 0-)

    ... a lot more eyeballs.

    Don't tell me what you believe, show me what you do and I will tell you what you believe.

    by Meteor Blades on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 08:01:34 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site