Skip to main content

The two main arguments in defense of the President's new chained CPI Grand Bargain proposal seem to be that:

1) the Grand Bargain is dead on arrival, anyway, so it doesn't matter except as a way to make Republicans look extreme;


2) the Grand Bargain is preferable to the sequester, so Democrats are doing the right thing to accept it as the lesser of two evils.

These are funny arguments for a few reasons, not least of which is that they're mutually exclusive. If the Grand Bargain has no chance of passage, then it's not a legitimate play to present as an alternative to the sequester. If there is a chance of it passing then it's a real offer, not a gambit in eleventh dimensional chess.

But let's take each argument in turn, starting with the latter. Digby already covered the fact that the forced choice between the sequester and the Grand Bargain is an unnecessary illusion. Sequestration is deeply, wildly unpopular with most people. Neither side wants to be left holding the bag in support of it, except in extreme Republican districts.

Cutting Social Security, meanwhile, is also extremely unpopular. The first basic rule of politics is that if one's opponent wants and demands really unpopular things, the right move is to hammer them on it every single day until election day. The answer isn't to simply give in because they won't do anything else, or to offer something equally unpopular in the hopes they will relent. And if Republicans can't be made to pay a political price in 2014 or 2016 at the latest for supporting radically stupid policies, then the country is in serious trouble, anyway. One has to at least make an attempt to intimidate them by using the threat of electoral defeat. The government is already lurching from crisis to crisis, anyway, unable to pass even basic legislation. What difference would a more aggressive stance from Democrats make to that equation, except to give David Brooks heart palpitations? Little to none.

More importantly, a Grand Bargain is potentially more damaging than sequestration. Sequestration is highly damaging on its face. Republicans hate the dumb, non-targeted cuts to military programs; Democrats hate the dumb, non-targeted cuts to social programs. It's just bad all around. It was designed to be bad so that politicians would do something else.

But chained CPI is not so obviously awful at first. It's subtle at first, a cut that gets worse over time. The difference between sequestration and chained CPI is like the difference between throwing a frog in a pot of hot water, and slowly heating the frog's water to boil. The frog is much likelier to jump out of the first pot than the second.

As to the first argument that the Grand Bargain will fail regardless, so it's a good way to make Republicans look even more extreme? That's the so-called "eleventh dimensional chess" argument: the view that Barack Obama is using deft jiu-jitsu to put Republicans in an impossible situation, painting them into a deeper corner of extremism. This fantasy is even more misguided. First, it may not fail. Second, cutting social security is not a great method of endearing oneself to the public. Again, it's important to remember that the vast majority of the public does not want to cut Social Security. Cutting Social Security doesn't make a politician look reasonable to the average voter. It makes them look crazy and extremist. Only in the Beltway is cutting Social Security seen as a laudable position.

Telling the public, "I offered to cut Social Security for them, and they wouldn't even go for that" isn't a great way to please anyone but David Brooks. The rest of the voting public will throw their hands up in disgust at a political system where both parties allow economy-wrecking billionaire CEOs to walk free while cutting paltry meal assistance for the elderly.

Even beyond that, offering Social Security cuts today becomes the benchmark for negotiations in the future.

Rhetoric itself has consequences, even if it doesn't lead to legislation. Rhetoric communicates values. Rhetoric creates starting points for new battles ahead. And the rhetoric of cutting Social Security for no good reason is terrible for Democrats politically, and terrible for the country as a matter of public policy.

The Grand Bargain is bad policy. It's bad negotiating. It's bad eleventh dimensional chess, too.

Cross-posted from Digby's Hullabaloo

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Meteor Blades, SME in Seattle, Thumb, JekyllnHyde, paradox, Angie in WA State, pundit, jec, coral, Chi, Odysseus, hester, copymark, teacherken, slinkerwink, Sparhawk, Maxlongstreet, badger, Gooserock, Danno11, emal, johnmorris, sumitsu, Shockwave, mrhelper, scorponic, Wintermute, CleverNickName, liz, LuvSet, hyperstation, LEP, eeff, Duncan Idaho, LeftHandedMan, Rachael7, freelunch, RFK Lives, Matilda, hubcap, niemann, bronte17, Zinman, TracieLynn, susakinovember, Agathena, chuckvw, shanikka, farmerhunt, Clues, michael1104, ctsteve, splashy, antirove, sidnora, wader, revsue, Redfire, tomephil, psnyder, Dallasdoc, 2laneIA, Noodles, delphine, wmtriallawyer, JimWilson, penguins4peace, Calidrissp, Timbuk3, riverlover, Deward Hastings, rolet, Armand451, nailbender, humphrey, sandblaster, 3goldens, corvo, Superpole, basquebob, Brooke In Seattle, YucatanMan, EJP in Maine, Laurence Lewis, ratzo, Dem Beans, where4art, Burned, cassidy3, Tool, Savvy813, turnover, coloradorob, mightymouse, CJnyc, Jim P, esquimaux, tommymet, golem, Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse, Medium Head Boy, Kingsmeg, vigilant meerkat, rl en france, New Rule, blueoasis, DarkestHour, triv33, praenomen, gooderservice, thegood thebad thedumb, Potus2020, Turbonerd, lazybum, profh, Timothy J, Lovo, Dreaming of Better Days, kurt, sea note, Little, ammasdarling, One Pissed Off Liberal, pgm 01, dov12348, out of left field, bluicebank, fabucat, Habitat Vic, Haningchadus14, SpecialKinFlag, Dartagnan, yoduuuh do or do not, FishOutofWater, LillithMc, tbirchard, david mizner, DWG, joedemocrat, aliasalias, newpioneer, artisan, HCKAD, rivamer, Aunt Martha, BlueInKansas, pioneer111, CT Hank, leonard145b, madgranny, Don midwest, Assaf, on the cusp, TomP, cville townie, Blue Boy Red State, cynndara, seriously70, TruthFreedomKindness, darrow, MikePhoenix, Thomas Twinnings, elwior, brooklynbadboy, jamess, tofumagoo, Dancing Frog, MrJayTee, mofembot, No Exit, petulans, 3rdOption, squarewheel, LaFeminista, maggiejean, Rhysling, McGahee220, cybrestrike, DontTaseMeBro, Rick Aucoin, nchristine, lostinamerica, LinSea, ewmorr, banjolele, tari, maryabein, Zotz, JesseCW, dRefractor, RageKage, kevinpdx, jfromga, catilinus, Words In Action, ruscle, Just Bob, smileycreek, confitesprit, NMDad, FogCityJohn, p gorden lippy, eXtina, Susan Grigsby, Anima, mookins, Progressive Pen, TealTerror, Eddie L, gulfgal98, Lady Libertine, ItsSimpleSimon, Kristina40, ban48, Johnny Q, Betty Pinson, kenwards, slice, allenjo, mama jo, zooecium, ozsea1, Oldowan, StateofEuphoria, bgblcklab1, sostos, Fruitaholic, deeproots, smiley7, Jasonhouse, slooterdam, floridablue, Grandma Susie, wintergreen8694, Empty Vessel, peregrine kate, PhilJD, VTCC73, StateOfGrace, Hayate Yagami, Anthony Page aka SecondComing, kareylou, Sunspots, Willa Rogers, RLMiller, DRo, SouthernLiberalinMD, jeopardydd, DeadHead, ursoklevar, cwsmoke, Williston Barrett, greenbastard, Siri, Joieau, Ginger1, Horace Boothroyd III, peachcreek, pot, Leo Flinnwood, radical simplicity, lunachickie, JustinBinFL, wasatch, Purplehead, Blue Dream, Chaddiwicker, dallasdunlap, jbob, 84thProblem, Alhambra, northerntier, night cat, Stentorian Tone, OldSoldier99, ajbailin

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site