Skip to main content

So....I noted Roger Ebert's passing, and was thinking about Film.  Burt Lancaster is pretty Old School, and sometimes his acting was a bit wooden, but when he was handed the right script, by the right director...he could do a fine job.  I was thinking about one of the oddest films today...probably because I am going through some storms of my own, and this film certainly chronicles one man's storm.  It's probably the best work Burt Lancaster ever did, and perhaps one of the least watched.  

The Film is "The Swimmer", made in 1968, and directed by Frank Perry.  It was based upon a short story by John Cheever, and as Roger Ebert points out in his review, http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/... the film really conveys the sense of a literary short story.  The narrative quality of the film is sparse.  It's all about character and setting.  And insinuation of "the rest of the story."

If you've never seen this flick...check it out.  It may not change your mind about Burt Lancaster, if you are not inclined to think of him as a great actor, but it might soften your attitude.

Here's a sort of cheesey trailer to the film...it was really unlike most films that Hollywood released at the time.  I have to wonder who it was that green lighted the project.

Burt Lancaster was before my time.  I was born in 1956.  He was born in 1913.  Still, I've seen many of his films, and it's hard to argue that the man wasn't attractive, as well as a good actor.  "The Birdman of Alcatraz", "Elmer Gantry", "Trapeze", "From Here to Eternity"...all the way to "Field of Dreams."  He aged well.

In 1968, he was 55 years old.  If I looked that good in bathing trunks 2 years ago, let me tell you, people...I'd be wearing them 24/7.  But that's beside the point.

When I first watched this film, I was a little perplexed.  It sort of went over my head.  I was looking for a story, and what I got was character.  I actually did also get a story...but just not the sort of story that Hollywood usually tells, and so it wasn't the story I was looking for.  There was no "beginning...action...and ending"  It wasn't neat.

It was, as Ebert says in his review, quite literary.  If you watch this film, or remember it, the thing that strikes you is this..for a film that is 45 years old, it feels very experimental.  There are some quirky Indy films made these days, but this was made when the old Hollywood Studios still reigned, but were nearing their end.  

If this film were made today, with younger and fresher faces, and more modern dialogue, it would be well received.  

I've never read the Cheever short story.  I really should do that.  I'm sure it's chock full of biting observations of mid-century suburbia.  In fact, he has been called the "Chekhov of the Suburbs", "The Ovid of Ossining.."  http://www.guardian.co.uk/...

But they don't really make films like this today.  Mostly because this film was about the moment, and that moment is 45 years past.  The movies made today, quirky or otherwise, that capture the zeitgeist of the hour feel completely differently.  

Frank Perry made a few other films of note..."Diary of a Mad Housewife", "Play it as it Lays", "Mommie Dearest"...he was nominated for an oscar in 1962 for his directorial debut in "David and Lisa."

If you read this and belong to Netfix or can stream this movie from another source...I encourage you to check out "The Swimmer."  For some it will bring back memories.  For others, it offers a pretty good glimpse into American culture round about 1964.  It was more than Mad Men.

Originally posted to Keith930 on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 06:43 PM PDT.

Also republished by Community Spotlight.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site