Skip to main content

Floyd v City of New York, aka Stop & Frisk on Trial, continued into its fourth week today, with Judge Shira Scheindlin evincing acute interest in the 'Frisk' part of 'Stop & Frisk.'

 photo judge-scheindlin_zpsebe77bc4.gif

"Which pockets?" Judge Scheindlin asked. "Pants? Jacket? Shirt?"

The man, Nicholas Peart, 24, was certain the police had reached into his pants pockets.

"Front pockets or back pockets?" the judge asked.


When one witness testified that his jacket pockets were searched, Judge Scheindlin wanted to know whether those pockets were on the outside or inside of the jacket...

The basis of 'Stop & Frisk is a 'Terry Stop', legalized by the US Supreme Court in 1968 in Terry v Ohio. It allows the police to lightly pat down someone when the officer believes there is

a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
Only if a weapon or other contraband is discovered in this patdown is the search allowed (theoretically) to continue.
Courts have generally found that an officer's frisking can expand into a search of a suspect's pockets only if the pat-down reveals the presence of a weapon or some other contraband that the officer was able to immediately identify simply by patting it.
 photo stop-and-frisk-art.jpg

But as anyone who has ever seen someone 'Frisked' or has listened to testimony about being 'Frisked' knows, the police routinely and consistently violate the 4th amendment as defined by Terry v Ohio, e.g.

During the stop of Mr. Peart on his way to the bodega, he was handcuffed and placed in a police car. There, an officer asked him if he had marijuana, took off his sneakers and patted down his socks, before releasing him, Mr. Peart testified.
It is no surprise that NYPD has never been particularly concerned about consitutional rights, but in the era of 'Stop & Frisk' that concern has diminished even further, as pressure to make stops has risen.
Silverman presented findings from two surveys he and Prof. John Eterno did of retired police officers... In the case of pressure to make stops, the proportion of cops that reported high pressure to make stops increased almost fourfold (from 9.1% for the pre-1995 era to 19.1% in the 1995-2001 era to 35.1% in the 2002-2012 era) while those reporting low pressure fell by more than half.

One thing that Silverman and Eterno's 2012 survey found that did go down was pressure to obey constitutional rights. For the early era, 44.6% reported high pressure to obey the Constitution, and in the Bloomberg era, that number dropped to 35.7%.

Not only is 'Stop & Frisk' unconstitutional because it violated Equal Protection - young men or color are statistically certain to be targetted more than other demographics, as was testified to last week...
((Professor Jeffrey Fagain's analysis demonstrates that)) the higher the percentage of Blacks and Latinos in a neighborhood, the more likely people are to be stopped there... an individual's race is a statistically significant predictor of how likely they are to be stopped, with Blacks and Latinos more likely to be stopped than whites.
but given a Terry inch, the police inevitably take a Scalia mile. (Just made that up, but it seems apropos). 'Stops' turn into assaults; 'Questions' turn into abuse; and 'Frisks' turn into whole body searches and, when male police searches of women occur, the opportunity for sexual exploitation.

It's time for Judge Scheindlin to order NYPD to put the 'reasonable' back into 'suspicion' for 'Stop' and the Fourth amendment back into 'Frisk'.


Other Stop & Frisk on Trial and Related Diaries:

Stop & Frisk on Trial. 'Floyd v City of New York', Class Action against Stop&Frisk, Began Yesterday.

Stop & Frisk on Trial.

Stop & Frisk on Trial: NYPD Chief Kelly Admitted Cops Target Blacks 2 'Instill Fear' Says State Sen.

Mr. "Stop & Frisk" Comes to Oakland.

'Stop & Frisk' Dealt Major Blow in NYC by Federal Judge."

Originally posted to jpmassar on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 08:17 PM PDT.

Also republished by Occupy Wall Street, ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement, Progressive Policy Zone, and Police Accountability Group.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site