Skip to main content

Why?  

America is recognized globally as a leader.  The United States signed the Kyoto Protocol agreeing to participate in reducing carbon emissions along with 190 other countries (even though it was not ratified).  Many other agreements have been made since, as recently as last year, where all parties agree that the issue requires that all of the top polluters commit to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions. President Obama is the leader of our country and has committed publicly to fight global warming.  Doing so, by definition, requires a reduction in America's carbon footprint, especially since the US is one of the world's biggest carbon dioxide polluters, second only to China.  The Keystone XL pipeline would be used to move some of the dirtiest burning oil over US soil and two major aquifers to be processed and then shipped overseas. That's right, we don't even plan to use most of this oil in America.  Approving the Keystone XL pipeline would make America and our President hypocrites.

Saying "NO" to the pipeline is sending a message to the world that the US is committed to solving the problem of global warming.  How can we expect any other country to do more than we are willing to do ourselves?  Back in 2007, when then Senator Obama declared his run for the White House, standing on the steps of the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Ill., he said, “Let’s be the generation that finally frees America from the tyranny of oil.”  More recently, at his second inaugural address in January, President Obama recommitted himself by saying:

We, the people, still believe that our obligations as Americans are not just to ourselves, but to all posterity. We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms. The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition; we must lead it. We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries - we must claim its promise. That is how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure - our forests and waterways; our croplands and snowcapped peaks. That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God. That's what will lend meaning to the creed our fathers once declared.
Then again, in his state of the union, the President said:
If Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future, to reduce pollution, prepare our communities for the consequences of climate change, and speed the transition to more sustainable sources of energy.
Mr. President, the fact is, one cannot have it both ways.  America cannot say that climate change mitigation is a priority whilst vying for position as a global oil refining and distribution leader.

(continued below the fold below)

Who pays for global warming effects?  Government and business, particularly the insurance business.  Then, they have to pass those costs on to the US taxpayer/consumer.  In addition to the financial costs, one must also consider the threat to global security.  This is why the insurance industry along with the IMF and the President of the World Bank are crying out for immediate action to mitigate global warming.  The head of the IMF, Christine Lagarde recently stated, “Unless we take action on climate change, future generations will be roasted, toasted, fried and grilled.”

Why would other nations work to reduce carbon emissions if the US expands its participation in refining and distributing the dirtiest oil in the world?

For those who may think that the environmental risks are negligible, think again.  Even the Canadians don't want to move this type of oil via pipeline across their own country because of lessons already learned.  As Bloomberg reported earlier this month, "Western Canada is producing more crude oil than it knows what to do with. So guess where Eastern Canada is going to get crude oil from this summer? By ship from Texas."  The Canadians know that the tar sands oil, dilbit, is extremely hazardous as well as being more expensive to clean up when it spills.  

The State Department recently released a Draft  Environmental Impact Statement which downplayed the environmental risks associated with the pipeline.  The report neglects to address the fundamental question, "What impact will the pipeline have on overall world greenhouse gas pollution over the next forty years?"  Perhaps, they did so because of the immediate stress and threats to the environment which cannot be ignored by any reasonable person.  

To make matters worse, Mother Jones broke the story last month that the State Department hid the fact that one of the experts hired to draft the report has ties to the Canadian oil company that wants to build the pipeline.  But, the administration does not need to hire contractors to understand the serious environmental and public health risks posed by transporting dilbit.  In July of 2010 a Canadian oil company, Enbridge, spilled over a million gallons of dilbit into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan.  It is still trying to clean it up as ordered by the EPA and as assessed by the NTSB, who have oversight of pipelines in the US.   Last month, the EPA issued another order to Enbridge because they have not been able or willing to date to complete the cleanup the massive spill, which spread over 35 miles of the Kalamazoo River, after almost three years .  The Kalamazoo spill, along with the more recent one in Mayflower, Arkansas, should serve as warnings to Americans that we are not prepared to handle the potential impacts of transporting tar sands oil.

In addition, it seems that the oil industry would like people to think that tar sands oil, "diluted bitumen" or "dilbit", is no different than conventional crude oil, which is inaccurate.  It is burns dirtier (more in greenhouse gas emissions) than conventional crude.  The tar sands bitumen (commonly known as "asphalt") is solid, or semi-solid, like thick peanut butter.  It has to be diluted with a toxic cocktail of substances, some known carcinogens, to move it through a pipeline, making spills hazardous.  The dilbit, is more difficult and, in the case of the Kalamazoo River spill, at least forty times more expensive to clean up.  When dilbit spills, some of the dilutants evaporate into the atmosphere while the heavier bitumen sinks if in water making it much more difficult, if not impossible to clean up.  One homeowner equated it to walking over chewing gum on his lawn.

After the Kalamazoo River spill, over 50 families had to be evacuated due to the high level of benzene in the air, a component of the dilbit.  Long term exposure to benzene causes effects on bone marrow and can cause anemia and leukemia according to the NTSB's report.  331 people have reported health effects because of the dilbit spill.  The Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives reported last October:

"According to the NTSB’s final report, only two days after the spill the denser bitumen had separated from the dilutants in the dilbit and sunk to the bottom of the river bed, covering about 40 kilometres. Meanwhile, the dilutants -- containing benzene, toluene, and micro-polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) -- began off-gassing in the area, causing symptoms such as nausea, dizziness, headaches, coughing, and fatigue in 60% of the local population. Oil spill expert Riki Ott recently told a Vancouver Island audience (see Sept.-Oct. Watershed Sentinel) that micro-PAHs are major health hazards, causing cancer, asthma, hormone and reproductive problems by “jamming immune system and DNA functions.”
Opponents of the pipeline argue that dilbit (tar sands oil) is more corrosive given that it is more acidic and grittier due to the presence of silica in the mix, making the likelihood of a spill or leak higher.  The NTSB report indicates that corrosion and acidity were both factors in the rupture at Kalamazoo Creek as well.  So, the tar sands oil "dilbit" to be transported through the Keystone XL pipeline burns dirtier, is more toxic, a major threat to fresh water supplies and public health, likely to be more corrosive and more difficult and hazardous (and therefore many times more expensive) to clean up.  Basically, an ecological and financial disaster waiting to happen in every sense of the word.  And, ironically, oil companies moving dilbit don't have to pay the excise tax into the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund because it is not classified by the IRS as conventional crude oil.  The fund was set up to protect the taxpayers from the costs of oil spills.

In addition to global warming, one cannot ignore the threat to at least two aquifers, one of which is the nation's largest, Ogallala, which provides drinking water to 82% of eight states, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas as well as 30% of the country's agriculture irrigation ground water.  Everyone in those states and farmers in the Midwest should be calling on the White House and the Secretary of State to protect us from ourselves on this one.

Water security is essential to food security, public health and life.  We are obliged to protect our fresh water aquifers at all costs.  In 2012, "the most severe and extensive drought in at least 25 years seriously affected U.S. agriculture, with impacts on the crop and livestock sectors and with the potential to affect food prices at the retail level" according to the US Department of Agriculture.  Another severe  one is already predicted for 2013 by the NOAA weather service.  And, unfortunately, the areas that may be hardest hit are the very same areas served by the Ogallala aquifer and the Keystone XL proposed route.

The only argument for this pipeline (other than oil related industry profits) is that it will create 35 permanent jobs and about 3,900 temporary jobs for a year, of which as few as 10% will be hired locally.  Of course, all residents and businesses near the pipeline or that depend on water from the aquifers could be harmed in the event of a spill, another issue not addressed in the State Department's Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement.

This project truly is an all risk, no reward for your constituents.  Safeguarding the planet, our health and security must take priority over the wishes of an industry that has already left us with several, including the most expensive, environmental disasters.  Again, Mr. President, you must say "no" on the Keystone XL pipeline.

Originally posted to julesrules39 on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 07:00 PM PDT.

Also republished by Community Spotlight.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  well done julesrules, Thanks for diary agree (8+ / 0-)

    No KXL!!!

    Macca's Meatless Monday

    by VL Baker on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 07:08:58 PM PDT

  •  Well-done. (6+ / 0-)

    I especially like how the illustrate more general conclusions with a number of specifically observable detail, as with the recent spills, but with all the main points in your post.

    I wrote a long response about our problems in educating and activating the realities of global warming to an understandable crisis level to the people, from the average citizen to the nation's top legislators and leaders.  I see the writing here as a movement in that direction, as well as a few others lately.  I decided to delete my comment because it was too long for many to read, and however much we would like to think otherwise, even here few long comments receive much attention.

    The pipeline is both a dangerous risk in and of itself and an enhancer of global warming.  I chose to comment here for several reasons but primarily to say that unless we can make this crisis, which I refer to as the ultimate crisis, graphically clear as to the suffering and risk to life on earth itself we will never be able to save ourselves.

    I'm glad to see movement in this direction.

    “April is the cruellest month, breeding/ Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing/ Memory and desire, stirring/ Dull roots with spring rain." T.S. Eliot

    by blueoasis on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 08:14:25 PM PDT

  •  Cant have it both ways, well done TnR (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    blueoasis, marina, praenomen, Lujane, Churchill

    .................expect us......................... FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 08:27:43 PM PDT

  •  why say no? who does he serve? (4+ / 0-)

    just the destruction of the bio sphere .. who cares?

    #1 climate scientist James Hansen, if KXL passes the game is over

    who cares?

    the cat is now out of the bag

    the political system works for the 1%

    there is a diary up now about how legislation went through the congress to reduce transparency in the stock market

    notice how quickly legislation that benefits the 1% gets enacted

    they noticed that they might get caught, so they made sure that the legislation was reversed

    "Obama can't get anything done because of those terrible Republicans"

    4/11/2013    Introduced in Senate
    4/11/2013    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Introduced in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
    4/12/2013    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.
    4/12/2013    Presented to President.
    4/15/2013    Signed by President.
    How many bills, especially in this Congress, steamroll through the legislative process like this?
    here is the link to that comment and from that can get to the diary of the author

    http://www.dailykos.com/...

    •  It's similar to (3+ / 0-)

      the Monsanto Protection Act that Congress recently passed and Obama signed...which of course was similar to this bill:

      In 2005, Congress enacted a law that immunizes gun dealers and manufacturers from liability for injuries resulting in the "criminal or unlawful misuse" of a firearm. The law authorized dismissal of any applicable pending lawsuits and prohibited future claims.
      Laws are meant to deter average Americans...they have nothing to do with holding the wealthy accountable for their crimes...

      ...and Obama makes certain they aren't prosecuted.

  •  yes, he must say NO! (4+ / 0-)

    but I'm betting my last dollar he won't. He has been with this sad, bad business all along, quietly suggesting more fossil fuel energy sources is what's good for the rest of us, paying no attention to the environmental harm, anymore than those crazed Canuks are willing to let go of their thesis tar sands oil production and sources is also what's good for their economy. And then there is the intrigue of the EPA on this matter, who, as we all know, turns a blind eye whenever it comes to fracking. And FRACKING is the worst of what the fossil fuel ruinous industry commits in the way of an environmental crime. This is not pure cynicism that I spiel; it's pragmatic truth that has its proof in ongoing documentation that our government, and Canada's, sequesters. Isn't that the big word these days for all of us?

    Treat the world (yourself, and others) as part of a living organism. Everyone and everything will benefit.

    by richholtzin on Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 05:33:52 AM PDT

  •  Jobs, jobs, jobs! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Churchill

    If some murderous nut with a grudge can set bombs off in a high-security event in Boston, imagine the number of armed security guards it will take to adequately protect their precious planet-killing pipeline.

    Or else they could learn from the WTO and just demand a two-mile "exclusion-zone," cutting the country in half.

    We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both - Louis D. Brandeis

    by Anthony Page aka SecondComing on Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 08:39:37 AM PDT

  •  Having it both ways is business as usual in (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    julesrules39, Churchill

    the magic kingdom inside the Beltway. Saying one thing and doing another is now called "governing" - tell the hippies sweet little lies and then dump 'em for the rich, popular kid with the fancy car. So, I have to disagree, he can have it both ways and he probably will. I think he's busy figuring out a way to do it beneath the radar.

    Very comprehensive essay. If we only had a hundred million to promote it and give the proper visibility to these important realities you lay out.

    muddy water can best be cleared by leaving it alone

    by veritas curat on Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 10:01:23 AM PDT

  •  Yes, he does, and I am engaged in this subject. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    julesrules39, Churchill

    I have lost count as to how many signed petetions I have signed and sent to the White House on this subject! Will keep up the pressure!

  •  The cabinet (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    organicus, DFH, julesrules39, Churchill

    Obama's appointments to his new cabinet say "all of the above" for energy meaning they support fracking, oil pipelines, drilling everywhere.  Edward Moniz, Department of Energy, is a public advocate for fracking and the new Canadian pipeline.  We need opposition to Obama's appointments that counter the beliefs of a majority of the people, but somehow prevent the GOP for using our opposition to make it even worse.  We are truly in a bind when the Democratic President and the Republicans can work together against the majority of Americans.

  •  One obvious step: a special fund for dilbit spills (0+ / 0-)

    Since the dilbit industry does not pay into the crude oil spill fund, there is no reason not to have them fully cover a dilbit fund, that WILL address the greater toxicity, etc. ... of dibit!

    There will be no way to claim "we already paid our dues",
    and the fund should cover 100% of insuring for anticipated costs, and be fully paid for by the industry.

  •  I agree... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Churchill, julesrules39

    The president must reject the pipeline.

    But, given his track record of complete deference to corporate interests over our health and safety, I would be very surprised if he did.

    The Goldstone Report: Still accurate, relevant, and damning.

    by DFH on Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 01:41:30 PM PDT

  •  This is the guy who came into office (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Churchill

    singing about Clean Coal and Nuclear.

    We haven't heard too many Clean Coal arias recently, but fracking and tar sands are part of America's Energy Future. And nuclear is... er... it will be Safe.

  •  ATTENDING KEYSTONE XL HEARING (0+ / 0-)

    Husband and I will drive to Grand Island for the hearing Thursday. Weather may not be good, so dressing for COLD, windy weather is essential. It's about 150 miles west.
     know of 2 other cars going.

    Sierra Club Posted:
    If you are in one of the following cities, partner organizations Sierra Club and 350.org have organized group vans to transport Pipeline Fighters to and from Grand Island next week. Click on a city link below to view details and RSVP to join us on Thursday, April 18:

    Kansas City, Missouri
    Chicago, Illinois, Des Moines and Iowa City, Iowa
    Ames and West Des Moines, Iowa
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Wichita and Salina, Kansas  
    Commerce City, Colorado

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site