Skip to main content

Every Tuesday afternoon for the past two years, I've met with a trauma therapist. Pursuing a course of more specialized treatment was a option suggested to me by another psychologist, one who knew she had done all that she could with me. Before I began the process of finding a new provider, I felt that the search wouldn't be nearly as challenging as it turned out to be. My number one problem at the outset was finding a qualified specialist who took insurance, any insurance. Increasingly these days, specialists in certain fields have been insisting that all fees ought to paid out of pocket.

It does bother me immensely that some psychotherapists in the Washington, DC, area are charging as much per hour as lawyers. One thing I have learned about this city is that there is an overabundance of vocations present, psychologist and attorney being only two of them. This practice is highly exclusionary, even though I recognize that competition for business is heavy. The problems I've observed are not felt across the board, but the fact that they are present anywhere gives reason for concern.

There was a time, you may recall, where several of us unapologetic progressives wanted a single-payer health care system, or Medicare for everyone. From discussions with doctors and specialists, I've learned that Medicare as currently configured has some substantial problems. Psychologists and psychiatrists usually don't take Medicare because the rates of reimbursement are too low for them to stay in business. The amount of paperwork required is extensive and regularly too complicated to justify the time spent. Medicare is highly profitable for surgeons, however, because the surgeons' lobby is strong.

In examining the itemized statements that arrive one-by-one in my mailbox, the amount of money paid out to doctors is at times somewhere between incredible and obscene. My psychiatrist might charge $150 an hour, but a relatively simplistic surgical procedure to remove a pilonidal cyst costs $11,000 from start to finish. The surgeon must be paid, the anesthesiologist compensated, the drugs given to put me under covered in full, and more, even down to the IV put into my arm prior to surgery.

When we are still debating and coming to grips with the vast amount of avoidable violence that comes from mental illness + a firearm, we would do well to provide mental health providers their fair share of payment. Our tax dollars compensate their hard work. It is they who are on the front lines, providing an extremely necessary service to the community and to each of us. If we valued them more, we might not have to worry about a Congress too constipated to pass even basic safety and protection for every American.  

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will not be fully in effect until January 1 of next year. Because I'll still have chronic illnesses in need of treatment, I know I'll be able to observe firsthand the new changes. Some doctors I've talked to are privately nervous about any change whatsoever, not sure exactly what to expect.

If I've learned anything about politics, it's that one never knows quite what one will receive until it is in force. Political promises are a dime a dozen. I support health care reform, for myself and for others. But I foresee some bumps and jostling along the way that will require periodic legislative overhaul.

Lest my meaning be misconstrued, the quality of care I have received has been excellent, most of the time. When partnered with hospital systems or other large self-contained systems, Medicare and Medicaid provide a sufficient means of treatment. Small practices, however, rarely take either of them.

Collective mindset can be another hurdle. Mental health providers are often too focused on saving the world than to partner together to lobby for competitive rates of pay. Legislation might seek to be the great leveler, but in the end, the politically well-connected will always be in first place. As much as I may distrust the profession and find lobbying distasteful, it might be worth every American getting one of his or her own.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)

    I would not lead you into the promised land if I could, because if I lead you in, some one else would lead you out. - Eugene Debs.

    by cabaretic on Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 06:54:26 AM PDT

  •  Medicare, as it stands today, if very different (4+ / 0-)

    from Medicare as it was originally implemented. Give Congress oversight over anything and they will milk it for all it is worth to them. If they can't get money, then they will get political advantage.

    So, as I read your diary, it seems to me that your problem is with Congress. I agree.

    So, you have identified the problem. Hiring our own lobbyist won't work unless it is backed up with money to bribe the politicians.

    I see many people identifying and defining the problem, but workable proposals for worthwhile change don't seem to be available. That is, if one defines "workable," as something that can be implemented within our present system of government. I think that our government must undergo fundamental changes before Medicare, taxation, employment, education, etc. can be corrected.

    Might and Right are always fighting, in our youth it seems exciting. Right is always nearly winning, Might can hardly keep from grinning. -- Clarence Day

    by hestal on Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 07:10:30 AM PDT

  •  Yes, but (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    FloridaSNMOM, OooSillyMe, jdld, JerryNA

    The cost of a clerk at a medical practice that does insurance billing, and that clerk or perhaps another that does the insurance clarifications and fights for payment, are too much for a small medical practice.  The provider can't afford the overhead for insurance billing.  It IS a problem.

    Of course Medicare as it is now doesn't adequately cover some costs.  Tell us something new.  Many medical providers who accepted nothing but Medicare would go broke--not enough money coming in to pay for staff, rent, insurance, college loan repayment, and a salary for the doc.  It requires cost shifting from Medicare patients to those with higher paying insurance or cash.

    I support Medicare-done-right-For All.

  •  When the ACA was passed, (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    FloridaSNMOM, OooSillyMe, JerryNA

    I thought it would put pressure on the insurance companies, which would cause them to raise premiums which would then create a demand for single payer.

    But, instead, employers are incentivized to cut the hours of employees and thus avoid paying for insurance. I have a lot of clients who now work part time instead of full time. People are getting mad. I hope they deal with this soon.

    I'm afraid that my signature won't match the mood of my comment.

    by heybuddy on Tue Apr 23, 2013 at 07:21:29 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site