Skip to main content

Immigrants take the oath of citizenship during a naturalization ceremony to become new citizens of the U.S. in New York, April 17, 2013. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
Immigrants take the oath of citizenship.
As we've seen over the past few months, there are three schools of Republicans on the matter of immigration:
  1. Pass nothing. Immigration reform rewards lawbreakers and makes millions of new Democrats.
  2. Legalize undocumented immigrants, but don't grant citizenship. We don't want to make millions of new Democrats.
  3. Just pass the damn amnesty so we can stop bleeding support among the fastest growing demographics (Latinos and Asians)!

As you can imagine, the third group is the smallest. Republicans are right to worry about legalizing the 12 million or so undocumented immigrants. That's about the population of the state of Pennsylvania, the sixth largest state in the union. On the other hand, they can't keep losing Latinos by 40 points and more and have a chance at winning national elections in future years. Their bigotry has boxed them in, and they desperately need a way out to maintain long-term relevance.

Thus, the Senate's immigration working group has proposed a sort of hybrid of the first two options above—legalize everyone immediately under certain (reasonable) conditions, but don't make citizenship a possibility for at least 13 years (and subject to border security provisions, giving Republicans more opportunities to drag that out). Apparently the internal GOP hope is that they can, as a party, evolve past their bigotry over the next decade and make a play for these new voters when they finally get the chance to vote.

The bill's Republican backers in the Senate are talking optimistically:

The Senate will be first to act this year, and the bill needs 60 votes to pass. With [Marco] Rubio supporting it, [Lindsey] Graham says it can get 70 votes, including half of the 45 Republicans. He suggests passage by 48 Democrats and 22 Republicans.
House conservatives will try to kill the plan by delay, bottling up the legislation in committee and larding it up with poison pill amendments to strip out Democratic support and muck up any Senate-House conference committee. Meanwhile, House Speaker John Boehner and Paul Ryan have both said encouraging things about immigration reform, suggesting they won't stand in the way. It could be posturing, part of their cynical attempt at "rebranding," or it could be genuine concern that their House majority—built on gerrymandering—won't hold if they don't start making inroads with non-white voters.

Speaking of rebranding, however, just wait until the House starts debating "amnesty." If you thought talk of wetbacks and sinking ships was bad enough, just wait until bigoted House Republicans have to focus on the issue for an extended, dragged out period of time.

Originally posted to kos on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 08:26 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos and LatinoKos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site