Skip to main content

Days ago, FOX News suggested that President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder were more concerned about preventing hate crimes against American Muslims than combating terrorism against the United States. Alex Jones, was more direct, and  seemed to be saying that Obama was the leader of Al Qaeda. Both positions are simply crazy and much more related than they first seem. It is likely that the FOX position was carefully crafted to reignite the Birther mania.

There is no infallible way to explain why all hell has broken loose lately.  Since the 1950s, there was a tendency to explain political irrationalism in terms of people experiencing status and economic  deprivation. Some blame low educational levels.  These factors, presented in the framework of status politics,  might partly explain today's outbreak of political fundamentalism.  What we are observing came so rapidly and is so powerful that more explanatory tools are needed.

Everyone seems to agree that we live in times of multiple crises which generate great fear and anxiety. For several decades, the middle class has been under siege. Good paying industrial jobs were being exported. It became customary for wives to work in order to help prop up families standard of living.

Real wages for most people were largely stagnant in most years over the last three decades. . Individuals in the United States have sensed for some time that the middle class was losing ground and that the future was not looking good for their children. There was growing uneasiness, but people refused to listen to talk about growing inequality in wealth.    The terrible events of 9/11 made people uneasy about their own physical safety in their homeland.  There was growing uneasiness about illegal immigration, but there was still some hope that comprehensive immigration reform could do much to reduce the problem.  

In 2007, there were signs of recession and some warning signals in the financial sector. In the next year the financial system was near total collapse and the nation faced a deep recession that could have become a depression. People lost large parts of their retirement savings and many mortgages went under-water; that is more was owed than the houses were worth. This is when uneasiness became panic and rage. The crisis seemed to multiply because many became aware that the United States was becoming pluralistic. They did not like it, and they wanted to take their country back. At the same time, anger against illegal immigrants and Muslims reached record highs.

Clearly, the multiple crises effected the way people reacted. As the real financial and economic crises failed to abate, many people presented irrational political behavior. Almost out of  nowhere, a large far-right political movement emerged—The Tea Party.  It began as a reaction against the federal government using TARP to bail out Wall Street bankers. But in almost no time, the Tea Party people were furious with Senator Scott Brown, whom they helped put in Ted Kennedy's seat, because he had voted for a bill to regulate bank speculation. They had quickly been co-opted Dick Armey, Mrs. Clarence Thomas, and others,  operating through Freedom Works. This operation was funded  the Koch brothers , Richard Mellon Scaife, and others with limitless resources.
The Tea Party encompassed the far right wing of the Republican Party, and it attracted many Independents, most of whom did not have much political knowledge and were inclined to be impatient when they did not get what they wanted quickly. There were antecedents of some Tea Party positions in the far right-fringe groups such as the militias, Christian Identity, the Constitutionalists, and the Alaska Independence Party, and people migrated from those fringe groups to the Tea Party. It is difficult to distinguish between Tea Baggers and others who share many of their views and have great sympathy for them. Clearly their influence far exceeds the number of people who claim that designation.

It is worth examining a model provided by the late anthropologist Anthony Wallace to gain some insight into Tea Party and the outbreak of irrationality and intensely emotional politics. Wallace offered his revitalization movement hypothesis that was based on the study of some 18th Century  native American movements.  He saw a societal crisis that mounted slowly and then, due to some catastrophe, assumed enormous dimensions, throwing people into fear, anger and panic. Believing their society was on the verge of a terrible fate, people cast about for a way to reinvigorate it. Similarly, the financial and economic events of 2007/2008 convinced many people that the United States was heading into deep decline. It was the beginning of a period of a “period of cultural distortion.”

 It was marked by intense anxiety, disillusionment, and internal factionalism. Many people experienced economic deprivation and /or social deprivation, in which they thought they were losing social status and influence.  Those, such as Duane Champagne, who have applied the Wallace hypothesis to large, structurally differentiated societies, found that great social fragmentation occurred. This  certainly marks what is going on in the United States.
Wallace said that revitalization movements were  “deliberate, organized efforts by members of a society to construct a more satisfying culture, centered in a sacred message, and enunciated by a prophet of maximum leader, stating what is wrong now, what it should be like in the future, and how to get  from now to the future.”   Wallace attempted to explain how intense stress created social change and influenced group behavior.  The process he described does not provide an exact fit with what seems to be happening today.  For example, the Tea Baggers do not have one single charismatic leader.  However, the do revere a deceased charismatic president, Ronald Wilson Reagan.

What could be the  sacred scripture  for the Tea Party is an archaic and inaccurate interpretation of the United States constitution. They rely upon the anti-federal government theories advanced by southern secessionists in the 19th Century. The Tea Bag political fundamentalists claim to be “conservatives,” but conservatives are expected to revere tradition. Fundamentalists are impatient with tradition.
Since 2008,  polls show that most people sense that the nation is in deep trouble and is heading in the wrong direction.  In a revitalization crisis, there can be various kinds of revitalization movements. Perhaps the Occupy Wall Street movement will develop into something like a liberal revitalization movement.  These people clearly understand that corporate America totally dominates government and has subverted democracy.   However, there is no single, simple, and comprehensive liberal master narrative that explains what has happened and what can be done to restore hope in the nation's future. At the very least, these courageous protesters could supply the central theme in the master narrative the liberals so seem to lack.

 Many people are moving sharply to the right because they  are seeking to restore a mythical, golden American past.  In a number of Native American revitalization movements, including some not described by Wallace, the Native Americans rejected new ways and reverted to what were supposed to be purer  ancient ways of living and worshiping. Some of their conduct, such as that of the Ghost Dancers of the 1890s, call to mind the irrational acts of today's Tea Baggers.

Whether or not one accepts the revitalization hypothesis, it does provide a useful framework for  considering why so Americans have plunged into political madness.  A second explanatory framework can be deployed at this point. When people decide that their society is in very deep trouble, there is the possibility that many of them will find solace in some kind of fundamentalism-- a return to what they think are basics. It has been most fully defined in the context of religion, but there are other fundamentalisms that share the same characteristics. And, as Jimmy Carter has observed, religious and political fundamentalism often go hand in hand.

Caroline Arnold and Jonathan Rauche defined political fundamentalism as a “war of Us v. Them” approach to politics.1  It is the very opposite of the political system that was laid out in the Constitution of the United States.  Therre is such a thing as left wing political fundamentalism, but its adherents are few. This essay deals with right-wing political fundamentalism, whose adherents are very numerous and presently have the upper hand in American politics. Steve Harvey, a Denver journalist, had this to say about them.
It is right-wing political fundamentalism in America which marks the progress of the disease that has been incubating since our conception, a sort of proud anti-intellectualism that generally has privileged ignorance over knowledge, false certainty over humility, and dogma over analysis. 2

 Gerry Arbuckle said  fundamentalism is  “a form of organized anger in reaction to the unsettling consequences of rapid social and religious change.” It can exist in a political as well as in a social and religious context. Tea Baggism and Christian Dominionism are both forms of political fundamentalism. The latter also encompasses religious fundamentalism, and there is a great deal of religious fundamentalism to be found among many Tea Baggers.  Today many people seem to need both secular and religious fundamentalism because they provide certainty within  totalistic, unitary, and all-explanatory frameworks.

 Pundit Bill Schneider identified Tea Baggism as  right-wing political fundamentalism.  It emerged because there was a growing crisis for many Americans even before the economy fell apart.    Americans today are very fragmented and lack shared values.  Yet,  many people crave the certainty that religious people enjoyed in centuries past.     When crisis comes, they seek solace in  the next best alternative,  the conventional wisdom served up by the Right and corporate America. Unfortunately, the American  left offered no simple counter narrative. If it had a convincing narrative, it is possible that a leftist “war of Us v. Them” movement might have emerged.

   Faced with intense stress as they perceive their dominant cultural system crumbling,  people seek above all else to maintain emotional equilibrium and attain psychic renewal.  They must find ways to reduce stress levels. Wallace wrote that they  do this by adjusting the mazeway of perceptions with which they perceive the outer world. In some times and places, people have scuttled old view and embraced ideas for creating a more just economic order.

 That was unlikely to occur in the United States where there is no widely understood leftist narrative that convincingly explains life and events and explains how  to create a more democratic social order.  In the United States, people were far more likely to embrace the explanatory framework fashioned by corporate America and the Republican Party.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Too many liberals, leftists, and progressives (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Satya1, radarlady, mookins

    are tied to realistic thinking about complex isues facing a diverse world for them to accept and promulgate a simplistic emotion based explanation that would appeal to all the low information voters. The people most negatively affected by the changes the 1% corporatists have applied to society are by now reactiing mostly from their limbic brain so they can only operate on emotion based (mostly fear) ideologies. The one recent movement that taps into this is the Firearms Background checks legislation. Reasonable fear of having your children and you killed by random senseless violence is moving most of us in ways unimaginable 6 months ago. Pushing safety regulations  could be next to stop the corporatist push for fewer "regulations".  The tragedy in West, TX, each dertailment of toxic chemicals, the lack of taggants in gun powder all affect all citizns and not just the ones in any one factory. There are dozens of others that are being pushed as "environmental" needs when they should be labeled as  threats to our famalies on several levels.

    I'd tip you but they cut off my tip box. The TSA would put Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad on the no-fly list.

    by OHdog on Fri May 03, 2013 at 08:05:43 AM PDT

  •  Hi BC, I think it is well beyond the return (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    radarlady, mookins

    of birther mania.  

    You sort of lost me around the 5th paragraph because I'm not seeing a mention of the factor that IMHO is number one.  If I'm wrong, at least it is on the short list.

    Republicans are scared of people of color.  For me Sen. Toomey closed the deal on that beyond all debate.  You kind of touch on related Tea Party fears, but I think you're missing (at least the part I read) the unifying factor for the vast majority of Repub and Tea Party motivations.  They are scared shitless that leaders who are people of color or that leaders who care about social justice for people of color are making the decisions in government.

    It's painted across every major issue of the day.  It's why they would rather see government and perhaps the country crippled than work.  The first AA President CANNOT and they mean CANNOT be  allowed to appear competent.  They do not just oppose his policies.  That is obvious enough - too many of the policies were proposed by Repubs themselves only a decade or two ago.  They cannot tolerate the idea of what a successful Obama presidency would mean - that the country can do better when smart people of color are running it.  

    They MUST destroy Obama's legacy.  To them "it upsets the natural order of things".

    I'm not liberal. I'm actually just anti-evil, OK? - Elon James White

    by Satya1 on Fri May 03, 2013 at 08:39:20 AM PDT

  •  I applaud your efforts to understand (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mookins

    what is happening. I've been thinking about it too and have a vaguely developed psychological theory.

    It does seem closest to the politics before the Civil War.  It is definitely fear based.  I remember reading articles after Obama won the election in 2008 where GOP described themselves or were described as "shaken" by the results.

    I suspect it is that there world view, shaped by Fox News, was so far removed from reality that they couldn't understand what happened.  Since then they've fought it and tried to make it fit into their old world view.

    Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can transform the world.~ Howard Zinn

    by ParkRanger on Fri May 03, 2013 at 09:28:36 AM PDT

  •  I don't think you can really compare (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    efrenzy

    what the US has been through in the recent recession, difficult as that has been, to what Native Americans went through as their population was decimated by disease, their territory was confiscated, their people massacred or relocated to remote reservations, and their whole way of life threatened.

    That is what led to the religious revival movements such as the Ghost Dance. The Ghost Dance made people feel powerful, in fact invincible. It was a denial of everything that was happening and it held out the promise of reversing all of that. It was a kind of millennial movement. It was going to make the world right again by reversing the whole social order and that is considered possible because supernatural powers were going to step in and help do it.

    There are segments of the Tea Party that have this orientation because they are fundamentalist Christians who believe we are in the End Times. But I don't think the current Tea Party is primarily a religious movement.

    It is also, in considerable part, an astroturf effort. It is made to look like a grassroots movement but it's heavily funded by a handful of very big donors. They are pushing the extreme anti-government, pro-business rhetoric that is a key part of the movement.

    The really crazy stuff like birtherism is still minority opinion and is causing some schism in the movement, between the people who care about having electable candidates, and those who just want a full helping of crazy.

    •  You have a point (0+ / 0-)

      The suffering now is not nearly what the Native Americans experienced. Yet there is, to a different degree, the the fer among some that their whole life and culture are seriously threatened.
      I was looking for a social science model that goes far beyond Hofstadter.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site