Skip to main content

In justifying its decision to revoke the environmental clearance for a huge 1,050 MW coal plant the Indian National Green Tribunal (NGT) described its original approval as 'smacking of non-application of mind.' I couldn't agree more. In fact if the world moves forward with the massive coal pipeline it has planned future generations will have much stronger words than these. Hell, with climate change impacts today roasting Australia and disastrous air pollution killing hundreds of thousands of Chinese citizens we should have stronger words now.  But of course actions speak much louder than words and the NGT is letting its rulings do all the talking.

It turns out that this is just the latest in a string of rulings by the NGT that strike at the heart of India's proposals to dramatically expand its reliance on coal. Back in February of 2012 the NGT made its first ruling when it ordered a halt to construction of a coal plant in Kutch home the country’s first 'Ultra Mega Power Project' Tata Mundra as well as a slug of new coal proposals. After the Kutch ruling the NGT struck again revoking the environmental clearance for a coal mine in Chattisgarh. With the latest move the NGT is demonstrating that these decisions are anything but unique.

But to truly understand the importance of the latest ruling it's important to understand where the project was sited. Chattisgarh along with neighboring Jharkhand makes up the heart of Indian coal country. This is where India's remaining forests, coal, and indigenous peoples combine to form a volatile mix. It’s also where opposition to the coal industry is so dangerous you can be murdered for it even if you are a nun. It's here that the coal industry figured plans for yet another big coal plant would hardly be noticed, let alone challenged.

That is until some brave locals decided that enough was enough. They took advantage of the fact that the NGT gives locals the right to challenge any project anywhere in the country on environmental grounds. It’s an incredibly progressive institution first created by India's 'Green Crusader' Jairam Ramesh. An irony if ever there was one as the project locals just defeated was illegally granted approval by none other than Jairam Ramesh himself.

As it turns out the NGT had some choice words for Ramesh and the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF). According to the NGT the project was granted "…environmental clearance…by the MoEF hastily, without proper application of mind and without applying the principle of sustainable development and the precautionary principle since the power plant was proposed to be located in a critically polluted area…where the MoEF itself had imposed a moratorium on further projects." Moreover the NGT cited the fact that the MoEF "had not properly considered the comments and grievances raised during the public hearing." That was enough for them to drop the hammer, "The Tribunal observed that the MoEF's hasty action in granting clearance smacked of non-application of mind."

Scrapping a previously granted coal plant clearance on environmental grounds? Citing sustainable development and the precautionary principle? Dropping the proverbial smack down for rubber stamping such projects in the coal industry's wild west? It’s enough to make an activist swoon.

Policymakers in the US would do well to take note. After all the 'business knows best' anti-environment anti-regulation atmosphere that pervades the country has enabled one of the most destructive forms of mining - Mountain Top Removal (MTR) – to occur within a few hours drive of our nations' capital. The practice is so destructive it makes Indian advocates like Debi Goenka from Conservation Action Trust blush. If Indian activists react this way one can only imagine the words and actions the NGT would reserve for MTR. I'd be willing to bet they'd be a hell of a lot stronger than what we are doing about the problem.

Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  revoking a clearance already granted! (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Lujane, wader, Odysseus

    I wish that would happen here.
    I can see that there could be issues around the whole idea of revoking something, but considering how much of the time approval is granted on the basis of behind the scenes corrupt deal-making, revocation for "non-application of mind" sounds wonderful!
    It could somewhat level the playing field in terms of constant effort. When we do manage to keep some potential environmental disaster from getting approved, they just come back the next cycle and try again. When they get approval, they only have to get it once. It would be much harder to plan and fund these things if there were a danger of permission being revoked in cases that it shouldn't have been granted in the first place. It might make genuinely sustainable projects more attractive even to those who only care about making money.
    I Want It!

  •  The Supreme Court gave the go-ahead to a N plant (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Lujane, wader, Odysseus

    ...today, so that might be where India is headed.  More nukes, less coal.  

    You know, I sometimes think if I could see, I'd be kicking a lot of ass. -Stevie Wonder at the Glastonbury Festival, 2010

    by Rich in PA on Mon May 06, 2013 at 05:11:31 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site