Skip to main content

originally at Huffington Post on 12/29/10

Parker Palmer has been an important figure in American education for several decades. His book The Courage to Teach has influenced many educators, myself included.

I recently had the opportunity to meet Palmer, and to obtain several of his books I had not previously known. I have been reading The Active Life: A Spirituality of Work, Creativity, and Caring, which contains a long reflection on a Chinese poem translated by Thomas Merton. Therein I encountered a number of passages that I find very relevant to consider as applicable to our current approaches to education "reform" in this nation. Without further adieu, allow me to quote two passages, the first beginning on p. 74 and going on to the next page, the 2nd somewhat further down page 75.

I feel sorry for teachers (to take one example) who are required to spell out precise "learning objectives" long before a class begins so that they can measure their own "effectiveness." I feel sorry for their students, too. Education dominated by preconceived images of what must be learned can hardly be educational. Authentic teaching and learning requires a live encounter with the unexpected, an element of suspense and surprise, an evocation of that which we did not know until it happened. If these elements are not present, we may be training or indoctrinating students, but we are not educating them. In any arena of action -- rearing children, counseling people, repairing machines, writing books -- right action depends on yielding our images of particular outomes to the organic realities of ourselves, the other, and the adventure of action itself.
Our culture's fearful obsession with results has sometimes, ironically, led us to abandon great objectives and settle for trivial and mediocre ends. The reason is simple. As long as "effectiveness" is the ultimate standard by which we judge our actions, we will act only towards the ends we are sure we can achieve.
please keep reading

I have never been a proponent of the behaviorist approach, and our entire use of "objectives" seems redolent with it. To me, it causes us to forget the very real -- and messy -- collection of human beings before us in our classes.

Yes, there needs to be some means of ascertaining whether our instruction is helping the students to learn and grow. We tend to depend upon simplistic external measures, such as the low-level, high-stakes test that have overwhelmed so much else in education. If we raise test scores, we then claim we have achieved an objective, we have demonstrated our "effectiveness."

But what have we achieved? Is not the goal of raising test scores a clear example of the kind of thing Palmer describes as "trivial and mediocre ends." We do know how to raise test scores. But when we do that does mean we have demonstrated that we have increased learning, nor is it evidence that we have empowered our students to apply what they have in theory "learned" to any novel situation, one not defined by four or five previously selected choices one of which is considered to be correct. Unfortunately, the real world does not work that way. And insofar as what we do in education is not connected to the real world, it serves neither the students who are subjected to it nor the society that hopes for future benefits from what those students learn.

Insofar as we reduce learning and teaching to a series of discrete and narrowly defined objectives, we may be able to measure that kind of results, but we will not be learning whether the real persons before us are truly learning. The "data"' we obtain to "drive our instruction" only further diminishes what should be the exciting experience of true learning.

Originally posted to teacherken on Thu Jun 06, 2013 at 08:26 PM PDT.

Also republished by Education Alternatives and Teachers Lounge.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  the two block quotes are why I reposted this (3+ / 0-)

    I think they speak as powerfully against the current direction of educational policy now as they did when I first encountered them two and half years ago.

    What do you think?

    "We didn't set out to save the world; we set out to wonder how other people are doing and to reflect on how our actions affect other people's hearts." - Pema Chodron

    by teacherken on Thu Jun 06, 2013 at 08:26:21 PM PDT

  •  Process evaluation and Deming (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ER Doc

    The matter of evaluation and learning requires one concession: You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it think. You can make the water blue, or yellow, or smell good, but the thinking requires buy-in from the horse, and some horses are not gonna buy in, and attempts to make them just make the horse more obstinate.

    And here we bring in the thoughts of Deming. Deming was the guy who went to Japan and taught process control. Japanese manufacturing in the 90s was very good, and better than the US.

    So, in education, Deming's approach? The 14 Principles are of interest here:

    3. Cease dependence on inspection to achieve quality.
    4. Eliminate the need for massive inspection by building quality into the product in the first place.
    5. End the practice of awarding business on the basis of a price tag. Instead, minimize total cost. Move towards a single supplier for any one item, on a long-term relationship of loyalty and trust.

    Principle 3: Replace inspection with standardized test.
    Principle 4: Again standardized test.

    Deming was also opposed to bonuses for top producers.

    Everything that Deming suggested is under attack by the current wave of education destruction.

  •  Education in a nutshell (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ER Doc
    a live encounter with the unexpected
  •  teacherken, I love you. (0+ / 0-)

    Your comments to the diary, "NSA whistleblower reveals himself as Booz Allen Hamilton employee, Edward Snowden..." are brilliant and humane. But I want to say that your diary here, about Parker Palmer, confounds me with frustration for exactly the reasons I loved your response to the whistleblower diary.

    Doesn't the whistleblower diary demonstrate how important it is for our children to know about the Constitution? Haven't you, as a teacher of government, taught your students some essential facts of the history and laws of this country?

    Palmer's statement,

    Education dominated by preconceived images of what must be learned can hardly be educational
    exemplifies what has brought about the Common Core State Standards. Do you really want the American people to discover the Constitution haphazardly, or as it is being crushed by corporate mobsters?

    The only way I can think the corporate/NSA partnership could imagine itself getting away with tapping every phone in the country is under the impression that the American people don't know the Fourth Amendment from their elbows.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site