Skip to main content

A couple of weeks ago, the New York Times shone a front page light on a huge pile of petroleum coke (aka “petcoke”) along the banks of the Detroit River. Calling it the “the unloved, unwanted and long overlooked byproduct of Canada’s oil sands boom,” the Times echoed concerns we raised in our report earlier in the year about this dirty byproduct of refining heavy oils like Canadian tar sands.

The revelation that a huge pile of toxic petcoke was sitting in the open air along the banks of a river in Detroit has raised major concerns among community members and people all across the country.

But beyond the local impacts, one of the other key concerns we raised in our report back in January was that because petcoke is “priced to move” as a refinery waste product and can be burned essentially like coal, it’s growing abundance could help prop up a struggling coal power industry.

Well, in a new report from the New York Times on Thursday, we’re now seeing that fear play out in reality. 

The Times writes:

“A Canadian electrical power plant, owned by Nova Scotia Power, is chipping away at the three-story-high, blocklong pile of petroleum coke on Detroit’s waterfront. The company is burning the high-carbon, high-sulfur waste product because it is cheaper than natural gas.”
It turns out this power plant has been buying some of the petcoke that’s piling up in Detroit, citing “competitive reasons.”  In other words, the Canadian utility company saw a cheap source of fuel and jumped on it, despite that fact that petcoke is dirtier and more carbon intensive than even dirty conventional coal.

But don’t take our word for it. Check out this quote from one of the utility’s spokespeople:

“We had been steadily increasing our use of gas because we could buy the fuel at relatively low prices and using it creates fewer emissions than coal…In this case, the switch to coal help save our customers money over continuing to use gas…”
Unfortunately, petcoke production is growing with the boom in heavy oil production, and would only continue to do so if the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline is approved.

As our report showed, Keystone XL would produce enough petcoke byproduct to fuel 5 coal plants, yet the State Department failed to acknowledge the impacts this would have on the climate and local communities.  That resulted in its analysis being off by some 13% when it comes to greenhouse gas emissions.

The story of the Detroit petcoke pile should give the Obama administration some serious pause as they consider the Keystone XL decision. At a time when climate impacts are growing at a terrifying rate, do we really want to build a pipeline that will only help to prolong coal’s life while deepening our reliance on dirty oil at the same time?

Cross-posted from Oil Change International's Price of Oil blog.

Originally posted to dturnbull on Fri Jun 07, 2013 at 08:28 AM PDT.

Also republished by Climate Change SOS, Motor City Kossacks, DK GreenRoots, and Gulf Watchers Group.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site