Skip to main content

If the Daily Banter is still going to crucify Glenn Greenwald on PRISM and NSA leaks, then why won't they go after Barton Gellman? This article is cross posted from the Raging Chicken Press and more after the fold.

In the wake of the Edward Snowden files, the attitude towards journalist Glenn Greenwald and NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden has turned into smear campaign to distract readers from what has occurred.  One of the more outspoken bloggers leading this charge is Kutztown graduate Bob Cesca from The Daily Banter.  Over the weekend, Cesca released an article showing the “inaccuracies” in Glenn Greenwald’s reporting, but he hasn’t gone after the other journalist who are making, and supporting, the same claims as Glenn Greenwald.

As we wrote a couple of days ago in our article “From the Isle of Denial…,” Cesca’s factual arguments relies on the tech companies denial to publicly disclose a top-secret program.  To follow up on the public denials, we reported that the Washington Post, the New York Times and other news outlets weren’t toting Facebook’s or Google’s public statements.  On June 9th, Barton Gellman and others from the Washington Post stated:

One top-secret document obtained by The Post described it as “Collection directly from the servers of these U.S. Service Providers: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, Apple.”

Intelligence community sources said that this description, although inaccurate from a technical perspective, matches the experience of analysts at the NSA. From their workstations anywhere in the world, government employees cleared for PRISM access may “task” the system and receive results from an Internet company without further interaction with the company’s staff.

So, what does Bob Cesca release for a second time?  He doubles down and recycle the same arguments he made used earlier in the week and continues to make this an issue solely about Glenn Greenwald.  But why hasn’t Bob Cesca decided to go after Barton Gellman, who was the origninal reporter to publish the PRISM data?  After all, it was Barton Gellman who originally published the PRISM slides, and then it was followed up by Glenn Greenwald at The Guardian.

Since the leaks have been reported, Barton Gellman has been making the media rounds corroborating the same claims that Greenwald made in his reporting, which are the same claims that the those writing for The Daily Banter have been trying to debunk, relentlessly.  Clearly, Cesca is trying to go after the weakest link on the chain.  While Greenwald may be an outspoken “journo-activist,” Barton Gellman has had some of the more revealing intelligence stories over the past decade.  As Rachel Maddow cited on her show, Barton Gellman broke stories on Bin Laden escaping to Tora Bora, the aluminum rods in Iraq – which posed no threat – but the Bush Administration claimed were WMD’s, Bush’s “continuity of government” actions and a host of other stories.  While on Maddow’s program, Gellman once again backed up the claims that his PRISM story is correct.  When Maddow asked Gellman about the inaccuracies in his story – which are the same inaccuracies Bob Cesca has a huge problem with, Gellman replied:

The action is problematic.  You have a lot of people going around saying that ‘this is nothing different than any other kind of warrant, subpoena, it goes to a court to find probable cause, and then, only then, does the government go into the servers of Facebook, Google and Microsoft…’

…and that misses something really big, which are that there are secret opinions in the surveillance court, which means only in secret and issues opinions that are only classified that say ‘rather that having to specify a phone number, or email..you can now define the facility a search to be the entire server.

He then continues to explain the inaccuracies that have been cited.

So, my obvious questions for Bob Cesca is how come The Daily Banter is trying to make this a story about Glenn Greenwald?  And how come Bob Cesca won’t go after Barton Gellman who originally broke the PRISM story.  While Cesca still tries to cite articles that were released the day after the PRISM story broke, Gellman responded to the inaccuracies days after his original story broke, and has made multiple TV rounds defending the inaccuracies that – supposedly – Greenwald has been making.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  wtf is the Daily Banter? (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    PhilK, jrooth, vcmvo2
    •  That's what I was thinking, too. (0+ / 0-)

      So I followed the link to the article. Lame shit.

      The comments seem to be at about the same level as those at Balloon Juice. If it wasn't for argumentum ad hominem, they wouldn't have no argumentum at all.

  •  and the smear campaign against Greenwald (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    OutcastsAndCastoffs

    started back in January 2009 as I recall.

    Touch all that arises with a spirit of compassion

    by Mindful Nature on Wed Jun 12, 2013 at 12:00:06 PM PDT

  •  Just like Peter King (0+ / 0-)

    I won't watch that FOX clip of him (on the FP right now) whining about how GG should be prosecuted; one of the commenters asked if King castigated WaPo for reporting the same thing because she was at work and couldn't watch the clip.

    Honest to God, you'd have to be seriously stupid to not catch the hypocrisy in either that instance or the one in this diary.

    Beyond that, I've seen the Daily Banter. They've Google-keyworded it as "a blog for Serious People". I see them linked a lot on Twitter, but that's about the only place. So IMO, they aren't really all that--still, it's nice to know who's in denial and who isn't. My Twitter list got a little housekeeping last night ;)

    "The “Left” is NOT divided on the need to oppose austerity and the Great Betrayal. The Third Way is not left or center or even right. It is Wall Street on the Potomac."--Bill Black

    by lunachickie on Wed Jun 12, 2013 at 12:01:59 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site