Skip to main content

TopCommentsRedux

gays on acid

But First, A Word From Our Sponsor:

Top Comments recognizes the previous day's Top Mojo and strives to promote each day's outstanding comments through nominations made by Kossacks like you. Please send comments (before 9:30pm ET) by email to topcomments@gmail.com or by our KosMail message board. Just click on the Spinning Top™ to make a submission. Look for the Spinning Top™ to pop up in diaries posts around Daily Kos.

Make sure that you include the direct link to the comment (the URL), which is available by clicking on that comment's date/time. Please let us know your Daily Kos user name if you use email so we can credit you properly. If you send a writeup with the link, we can include that as well. The diarist poster reserves the right to edit all content.

Please come in. You're invited to make yourself at home! Join us beneath the doodle...

The National Organization for Marriage is holding its breath and turning blue because the Pew Research Center released a study showing that the media was reflecting the rapid shift in public opinion occurring towards extending full equality to LGBT Americans. Their press release today demanded that their tired old message of intolerance and hatred of teh gay be given more attention or they will roll around on the floor, kicking their legs and soiling themselves.

Washington, D.C. — Citing an independent news analysis, the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) today criticized the national news media for their overwhelming bias in favor of same-sex 'marriage.' According to the study released by The Pew Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism, stories with more statements supporting same-sex 'marriage' outweighed those with more statements opposing it by a margin of roughly 5-to-1.

"Those of us on the front lines of defending true marriage have experienced first-hand the news media's bias in favor of redefining marriage," said Brian Brown, NOM's president. "But this important new study proves that the news media is overwhelmingly biased in favor of same-sex 'marriage,' leaving viewers to wonder if they are trying to shape the news rather than cover it."

The Pew Center journalism research project studied nearly 500 news stories published from March 18 through May 12 and found that nearly half (47%) primarily focused on support for same-sex 'marriage,' while only 9% primarily focused on opposition. In contrast to the news media treatment of the issue, the Pew Center study found that comments by the public via Twitter were evenly split (31% in favor; 28% opposed), reflecting the close division of the country on whether marriage should be redefined to accommodate same-sex couples.

"This is a fascinating study that reveals the underlying bias of the media in support of redefining marriage," Brown said. "Yet despite that, the public isn't buying it at least based on reported Twitter comments. We call on editors, producers and reporters to carefully study their own coverage in light of this proven bias, and ensure that the voices of NOM and other supporters of marriage are fairly and adequately reflected in their coverage. This is especially important in covering the upcoming Supreme Court rulings expected by the end of the month, and their aftermath."

Since this is NOM we are talking about, I'm sure I don't have mention that they twisted the study like a cross-eyed contortionist eating a pretzel. But I will anyway. From the report:
Within the media debate on the subject, this report found that those arguing for same-sex marriage had a more consistent message than those arguing against.

Among supporters of same-sex marriage, the main argument was framed around civil rights. Nearly half (49%) of the stories studied in the news media included the argument that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry because it is an issue of equality. This was also the most common argument to appear in the LGBT media as well as on HuffingtonPost.com.  

The arguments against tended to vary more. The most common opposing argument was the idea that same-sex marriage would hurt society and harm traditional marriage, though less than a fifth of stories (18%) included this claim. Other arguments against the measure included the idea that homosexuality is immoral and that the government should not impose a new definition of marriage that strays from the traditional notion of one man and one woman.

In other words, the central message of equality is resonating. The incoherently babbled reasoning against equality is not. Like the majority of the population, the media is recognizing that the bigots have lost the debate. No amount of getting up there on our teevees and ranting about the icky gay-sex-having, "phony-marriage" doing homoseshuls is going to change the simple fact that the country is moving on, away from hate and intolerance. Pitching a fit isn't going to help. It only serves to highlight the prurient immaturity of the religious right.

NOM really needn't worry about losing their main demographic. They may be losing their footing, even on Fox...

All three of the major cable networks, for instance, had more stories with significantly more supportive statements than opposing, including Fox News.
...but as Loving v Virginia has proven, there will always be people like them around.


Now on to Tops!

TOP COMMENTS  
June 19, 2013

Thanks to tonight's Top Comments contributors! Let us hear from YOU
when you find that proficient comment.

From Dragon5616:

I liked what twigg had to say about European parliamentary democracy in Meteor Blades' diary Ohio extremist wants buyers for his assault weapons to keep 'pro-life' personhood project alive.
From Spirit of Life:
I thought this this comment by gtomkins was worthy of more daylight – it’s funny, and true! Found in Bill in Portland Maine's Cheers and Jeers: Wednesday diary.
From me, Steveningen
I found two excellent comments back-to-back in Hunter's diary Rep. Phil Gingrey: Gay marriage shows need to teach school kids proper gender roles?. First comes this hold no punches comment by K S LaVida, followed immediately by this beautifully crafted comment by ajk2821. Good stuff.

TOP MOJO
June 18, 2013


(excluding Tip Jars and first comments)

Got mik!


  1) In Michigan, the voters eliminated the by brooklynbadboy — 145
  2) who cares? by Laurence Lewis — 122
  3) Every republican run state provides by marking time — 115
  4) Darkly ironic. Arctic damage is irreparable. by FishOutofWater — 106
  5) Are sonograms now potentially child porn? by Trix — 82
  6) GG is "controversial' only because he is by Superskepticalman — 79
  7) This is a great loss. by lexalou — 79
  8) I Recall. 1987. My Father Ran For A by webranding — 77
  9) I could be wrong but Obama seemed to mislead by greenbell — 74
10) Sorry to hear about your ordeal by TheGreatLeapForward — 69
11) climate chaos by Laurence Lewis — 69
12) Suggest you consider the case of Thomas Drake by koNko — 64
13) FYI by Horace Boothroyd III — 64
14) 200,000? That can't be right... by markthshark — 62
15) I read this early this mornnig. by SaraBeth — 62
16) The New Normal: State-sanctioned oppression... by bobswern — 61
17) Truth-out, over the past 24 hours confirms... by bobswern — 59
18) Thank you, gchaucer2. by belinda ridgewood — 56
19) One of those automated weather stations. by weatherdude — 56
20) Think he'll bankrupt Clear Channel with that by polecat — 55
21) This fits with the testimony by bruh1 — 55
22) That is Greenwald's take on it. by Richard Lyon — 53
23) Minimize the damage by crystal eyes — 53
24) I'll go with the BBC numbers: 200,000 strong and by Ray Pensador — 53
25) I've often thought by young voter — 52
26) Wow! by cfk — 51
27) i appreciate your trying to provide balance by Laurence Lewis — 50
28) We don't know how far they're going in lying to us by Dallasdoc — 50
29) Every vaginal ultrasound by Lonely Liberal in PA — 50
30) I imagine if he was certain he'd be treated like by YucatanMan — 49
31) I think some people here would be very... by bobswern — 49

TOP PHOTOS
June 18, 2013


Enjoy jotter's wonderful PictureQuilt™ below. Just click on the picture and it will magically take you to the comment that features that photo. Have fun, Kossacks!

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site