Skip to main content

Sarah Kliff:
Texas Democratic Senator Wendy Davis’ nine-hour filibuster may be becoming to a quick end – and not due to the senator’s lack of effort.
Lieutenant Gov. David Dewhurst ruled that Davis has three times violated the Texas Senate’s procedural rules for a filibuster, which requires a senator to stand continually without assistance and remain on topic.

“There’s a three strikes, you’re out precedent in the Senate that allows senators two warnings about staying germane to the bill topic,” Texas Tribune reporter Becca Aaronson explains. “On the third strike, a simple majority of the Senate can vote to end debate and the senator must yield the floor.”

TX Republicans, looking to lower the boom on filibustering Sen Wendy Davis, try to end things. Majority decides what the rules are. #txlege
@WayneSlater
WHOA -- They just upheld a point of order on Wendy Davis' filibuster. She's done.
@jbendery
TX Senate GOP president: "What rule allowed us to do what we just did? The shut the fuck up and sit down rule. That's what."
@billmon1
"Let her speak! Let her speak!"
I suspect Texas Republicans have unleashed something here they'll wish they didn't
@politicalwire
With her filibuster, Sen. Wendy Davis made a point much bigger than an abortion bill in Texas. Very interesting to watch what happens next.
@politicalwire
millions more would be watching this debate if @MSNBC @CNN @Fox etc would cover this filibuster as they covered Cruz & Rand. @The_HFM #SB5
@sfpelosi
"... and the final violation is for talking while the men were speaking." - Texas filibuster rules, explained.
@Ugarles
Here's the central point: LtGov Dewhurst decided to rule that talking about abortion in a filibuster about abortion wasn't relevant. #txlege
@WayneSlater
RT @PattyMurray How are sonograms not germane to women's health? || About to see many more tweets like this, I bet.
@CitizenCohn
103000 people right now watching a debate about Robert's Rules of Order. Remarkable.
@jbarro
Whatever the outcome, @WendyDavisTexas efforts entered her into the pantheon of American heroes tonight.
#standwithwendy
@rickygervais
Dew accuses the advocates of using "Occupy Wall Street tactics." Best PR Occupy has had in a while! #txlege #SB5
@EricaGrieder
Dewhurst mansplainingly whacks the gavel: "Regrettably" #SB5 cannot be signed. #txlege
@EricaGrieder
CNN:
The Texas legislature's special session ended in chaos and confusion early Wednesday, when a marathon filibuster failed -- but so did a Republican effort to pass a bill that would have greatly restricted abortions in the state.
More discussion in OllieGarkey's diary. More politics and policy below the fold.

Ezra Klein:

Gridlock is, in many ways, a mistaken metaphor for what happens when Congress can’t act. In gridlock, as any Beltway driver knows, nothing moves. But much happens amidst congressional gridlock. It just happens in other, often less accountable, branches of government.

The result is the Supreme Court rewrites laws Congress passed, like the Voting Rights Act. The regulatory apparatus decides how carbon will be regulated, an issue that Congress clearly has the power, under normal conditions, to decide. The Federal Reserve plays a more active role in managing the economy — Chairman Ben Bernanke is, at this point, famous for begging Congress to do more with fiscal policy so he can do less with monetary policy. During periods of gridlock, Congress cedes power to other branches that would otherwise give it deference.

One major difference between Ds and Rs is that D's want to fix Congress, R's like it broken.

Bloomberg:

In a January 2012 report titled “Jihadism on the Web: A Breeding Ground for Jihad in the Modern Age,” the Dutch General Intelligence and Security Service drew a convincing picture of an Islamist Web underground centered around “core forums.” These websites are part of the Deep Web, or Undernet, the multitude of online resources not indexed by commonly used search engines.
So is penetrating “Deep Web” that what this: http://t.co/... is all about for #NSA? Total Internet Awareness?
@billmon1
NY Times editorial board:
The conservative majority on the Roberts Court issued another damaging and intellectually dishonest ruling on Tuesday. It eviscerated enforcement of the Voting Rights Act, in which Congress kept the promise of a vote for every citizen. But it did not rule on the constitutional validity of the idea that some places have such strong records of discrimination that they must seek federal approval before they may change their voting rules. Instead, the 5-to-4 ruling usurped Congress’s power and struck down the formula that it has repeatedly reauthorized to determine which states fall into that category.
Scott Lemieux:
As Aaron B.puts it in comments, this is an honest-to-goodness fair summary of Roberts’s holding:
Section 4 is not rationally crafted to achieve permissible ends as defined by the 15th amendment. It was, at one point, but since racism is fixed it is no longer necessary and therefore irrational.
Which, leaving aside the obvious problems so memorably characterized by Ginsburg with the assumption that because preclearance has been effective racism is pretty much over, is just wrong for the reasons already discussed.
Richard Hasen:
Today’s decision has real consequences. Chief Justice Roberts writes that ”regardless” of how we look at the record, “no one can fairly say it shows anything approaching the ‘pervasive,’ ‘flagrant,’ ‘widespread,’ and ‘rampant’ discrimination” in the past. If that’s true, it’s because the Voting Rights Act works.

Here’s what’s going to happen now. Texas has already announced that it will put its voter-ID law into effect, a law that was on hold under Section 5 awaiting Supreme Court review. Texas’ law, one of the toughest in the nation, requires voters lacking acceptable ID (like a concealed-weapons permit) to travel up to 250 miles at their own expense to get one.

Texas’ law will be challenged on other grounds, but winning voter-ID cases has proved to be tough business. Now Texas can also re-redistrict, freed of the constraints of Section 5, splitting Latino and black voters into different districts or shoving them all in fewer districts to make it harder for them to have effective representation in the State Legislature and in Congress. The biggest danger of what the court has done is in local jurisdictions, where discrimination is more common and legal resources to fight back are thin.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Wed Jun 26, 2013 at 04:17 AM PDT.

Also republished by Sluts.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site