Skip to main content

Another day, another self-congratulatory list of President Obama's progressive achievements.  Many specifics regularly included on these lists are hotly debated, with many of us finding some of them to be examples of downright insults to progressive ideals ("toppling" leaders of sovereign nations through violence has never been on my wish list).  But beyond that, I find the very concept of these lists, in the context in which they appear, to be an insult to progressive commitment to transparent, participatory democracy.  Beyond the fact that equally long counter-lists can be made of actions taken by this administration which are extremely damaging to core progressive values and to hope of achieving long-held goals, there is an assumption underlying these lists that political realities are best determined through defining personalities rather through focusing on policy, one issue at a time.

The net result of Obama's actions has been to protect and further entrench the wealthy and powerful as well as their influence over politics.  There are any number of studies quantifying the continuing concentration of wealth during this presidency, at an ever accelerating pace.  There has been nothing to suggest any inroads have been made toward ameliorating the influence of this concentrated wealth on government; all indications point to the contrary.  Obama's administration has undermined constitutional protections and further instituted secrecy and fear that leave government unaccountable while working powerfully against core progressive notions involving such things as war, poverty, and the role of government. Any purported progressive accomplishments he can claim to have made do not represent reflections of the will of progressive citizens so much as indulgences of those whose control of government he has further entrenched; such progress is therefore subject to being revoked by the same forces that allowed them to occur.  Not to say popular pressure has no influence; rather to point out that some actually progressive things are permitted so long as they don't require sacrifice by the wealthy and powerful.

Obama has undermined the constitutionally mandated structure of government and the rule of law.  Both are necessary ingredients for progressives to exert real influence over their government and to achieve the kind of society they work toward.  Therefore any seeming progressive achievements are merely crumbs from the tables of the masters during a time of general undermining of progressives.

To underscore this point, whatever things Obama has done that look progressive he has done while castigating and undermining actual progressives.  He has delivered the message time and again that progressives are imprudent, ideological, and not worthy of being listened to.  Expecting progressives then to salute him as their great hero, who has protected them from themselves while graciously doing for them only the things he in his wisdom sees fit to do--well, it just ain't gonna happen.  Progressives believe in participatory democracy.

Finally, the ubiquitous ad hominem that dominates the discourse of current propaganda is an implicit aspect of these lists of achievements.  Were the point simply to acknowledge some things that many of us might be glad about, that would be one thing.  But the point is to define Obama himself, as a person, to say that he himself is a progressive and thus to inoculate him from criticism for his many stunningly anti-progressive actions.  I have no argument with people who celebrate those achievements they support while at the same time decrying such things as illegal drone strikes, unprosecuted war crimes, prosecution of whistleblowers, and unprecedented government surveillance.  But what I see is the illogical, undemocratic argument being made that, because a list can be made of progressive things Obama has done, he is a progressive president and therefore is not guilty of any of the obviously anti-progressive actions he has taken.  At best, we are being asked to be pragmatic and bipartisan and swallow actions offensive to core progressive values because some good things happened.

The accuracy or inaccuracy of any such list, to me, is secondary to the basic way in which such arguments are offensive to core progressive belief in participatory democracy and in certain long-held principles.

Originally posted to geomoo on Sat Jun 29, 2013 at 01:09 PM PDT.

Also republished by The Rebel Alliance, The Amateur Left, and Progressive Policy Zone.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site