Skip to main content

A week or two ago I got in the mail from a Hillsdale College its survey on the U.S. Constitution, and found it to have a misleading, teabag bent. So, I edited it for relevance and clarity. (Hillsdale's text is in gray; My text is in yellow. Changed text is in italics.)

ISSUE SUMMARY:


Hillsdale College teaches that the Constitution of the United States (written in 1787) is the reason America grew so quickly to become the freest, most prosperous nation in history.
Hungeski says that the Constitution of the United States (last amended in 1992) is the framework for a strong, pragmatic central government that helped We the People make a prosperous nation with much freedom to lead a fulfilling life[x].

QUESTION #1: What is your level of AGREEMENT or DISAGREEMENT with this proposition?

  • Strongly Agree
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Strongly Disagree
  • Not Sure

ISSUE SUMMARY:


Some politicians and intellectuals today argue that the U.S. Constitution is outdated, and should therefore be treated more as a set of guidelines, but should not be strictly followed. Liberal Supreme Court Justices (including, Sotomayor, Kagan, Ginsburg and Breyer) see the Constitution this way, more as a set of guidelines that need not be followed strictly. The more conservative Justices on the Supreme Court (including, Scalia, Thomas and Alito) see the Constitution as the supreme law of the land that must be followed strictly
Some politicians and ideologues today argue that the U.S. Constitution is rigid, and should therefore be treated more as a set of strict rules for the 18th century, but should not be truly followed for life today. Right-wing Supreme Court Justices (including, Scalia, Thomas and Alito) see the Constitution this way, more as a set of strict rules for the 18th century that need not be followed truly for life today. The more centrist Justices on the Supreme Court (including, Sotomayor, Kagan, Ginsburg and Breyer) see the Constitution as the supreme law of the land that must be followed truly for life today

QUESTION #2:


Where do you stand in this debate on how closely the U.S. government should follow the Constitution?
  • I agree with the conservative Justices on the Supreme Court. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Government should follow the Constitution strictly, as law.
  • I agree more with the liberals on the Supreme Court. The U.S. Constitution is an outdated document. We should treat it as a set of guidelines, not strictly as law.
  • I oppose the Constitution. I don't think government should look to the Constitution at all for guidance.
  • Not Sure
  • Other

Where do you stand in this debate on how truly the U.S. government should follow the Constitution?
  • I agree with the centrist Justices on the Supreme Court. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Government should follow the Constitution truly, as law for today.
  • I agree more with the right-wingers on the Supreme Court. The U.S. Constitution is a rigid document. We should treat it as a set of strict rules for olden times, not truly as law for life today.
  • I oppose the Constitution. I think we should bring back the Articles of Confederation.
  • Not Sure
  • Other

ISSUE SUMMARY: The Tenth Amendment of the Constitution states as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"


In other words, the Federal government was set up to do very specific duties that only a national government can do such as: provide for a national defense, regulate interstate commerce, set up a federal system of justice, establish a currency and ensure domestic tranquility. Almost all other responsibilities of government are supposed to be handled by state and local governments, or by families and individuals. Hillsdale contends that if Congress actually followed the Constitution, including the Tenth Amendment, our federal government would be about one-third the size it is now.
In other words, the Federal government was set up with powers to do very important duties that are national matters such as: provide for a national defense, regulate interstate commerce, set up a federal system of courts, establish a currency, ensure domestic tranquility, establish justice, and promote the general welfare. Almost all other powers of government are over local matters to be handled by state and local governments, or by families and individuals. Corporations are given no powers. Hungeski imagines that if Congress and the Supreme Court actually followed the Constitution, including all of the amendments, Wall Street would be about one-third the size it is now.

QUESTION #3: What is your level of AGREEMENT or DISAGREEMENT with this proposition?

  • Strongly Agree
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Strongly Disagree
  • Not Sure

QUESTION #4:


How closely do you think our Federal government is following the Constitution today?
  • Not At All
  • Very Little
  • Some
  • Closely
  • Very Closely
  • Not Sure
  • Other

How truly do you think our Federal government is following the Constitution today?
  • Not At All
  • Very Little
  • Some
  • Truly
  • Very Truly
  • Not Sure
  • Other

ISSUE SUMMARY:


The Obama Administration is now building 159 new government agencies to administer ObamaCare and is hiring 16,000 new IRS agents to enforce ObamaCare. When radio host Paul Smith asked liberal Congressman John Dingell (D-MI) why it will take the government until 2014 to fully set up the ObamaCare system, Dingell said this:
"It takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people."
Source: News Talk WJR Radio with Paul W. Smith 3/23/2010

The 14th Amendment plainly says: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." But Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said that women have no equal rights under the Constitution: “Certainly the Constitution does not require discrimination on the basis of sex. The only issue is whether it prohibits it. It doesn’t. Nobody ever thought that that’s what it meant. Nobody ever voted for that.” Source: ‘The Originalist’ – California Lawyer, January 2011

QUESTION #5:


 Do you think our government should be more concerned with "controlling" the people (as Congressman John Dingell believes)? Or do you think the primary responsibility of government is to "secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity", as the preamble to the Constitution says?
  • I agree with Congressman Dingell. The primary purpose of our federal government should be to "control the people."
  • I agree with the preamble to the U.S. Constitution and America's Founders -- that the primary responsibility of the federal government is to "secure the blessings of liberty."
  • Not Sure
  • Other

Do you think that women should not have equal rights under the Constitution (as Justice Scalia believes)? Or do you think "any person" has a right to "equal protection of the laws", as the 14th Amendment to the Constitution says?
  • I agree with Justice Scalia. Women have no equal rights under the Constitution.
  • I agree with the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and well-settled law -- that equal rights apply to "any person."
  • Not Sure
  • Other

ISSUE SUMMARY:


Hillsdale contends that the fastest way to solve America's economic problems and restore America's position as the world's #1 economic power is for our federal government (including Congress and the President) to start  following the Constitution again.
Hungeski says that the fastest way to solve America's economic problems and restore America's middle class is for our federal government (including Congress, the President and the Supreme Court) to start following the Constitution again, and ban corporate personhood and corporate meddling in politics.

QUESTION #6: What is your level of AGREEMENT or DISAGREEMENT with this proposition?

  • Strongly Agree
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Strongly Disagree
  • Not Sure

ISSUE SUMMARY:


Hillsdale contends that America is in such dire straits because voters don't know enough about the Constitution and the case for liberty to insist on electing leaders in our government who also know and appreciate the magnificence of our Constitution and heritage of liberty. So Hillsdale has launched online courses on the Constitution that all Americans can take from the comfort of their home. So far, more than 325,000 Americans have signed up for these courses. Hillsdale is aiming to have 1,000,000 Americans taking this course in the next few weeks, and many millions more Americans taking this course in the months ahead. Rush Limbaugh calls Hillsdale's online "Constitution 101" course "unprecedented."
Hungeski says that America is in such dire straits because voters don't know enough about the Constitution and the case for the freedom to lead a fulfilling life to insist on electing leaders in our government who also know and appreciate the Constitution and heritage of the freedom to lead a fulfilling life. So Hungeski is providing this LINK to the Constitution so that all Americans can read it from the comfort of their home. So far, an unknown number of Americans have read the Constitution. Hungeski is aiming to have 1,000,000 Americans read the Constitution in the next few weeks, and many millions more Americans reading it in the months ahead. The ACLU says, "The Constitution is for the 100%!"

QUESTION #7:


How supportive are you of Hillsdale's "Constitution 101" online course to educate millions of Americans on "the blessings of liberty" and on the case for making America great again by restoring the Constitution as the supreme law of our land?
How supportive are you of Hungeski's "Read the Constitution" LINK to educate millions of Americans on "the blessings of liberty" and on the case for rebuilding the middle class by using the Constitution for We the People?
  • Very Supportive
  • Somewhat Supportive
  • Not Supportive
  • Not Sure

QUESTION #8:


Will you make your best freedom-saving donation right now to help Hillsdale buy $1 million in advertising so that every American can know about the online Constitution course that's now open FREE to all Americans . . . so we can increase enrollment from 325,000 citizens now taking this course to more than 1,000,000 citizens (or more) taking online Constitution courses in the next few weeks?
Will you make your best freedom-saving link share right now to help Hungeski spread the word so that every American can know about the "Read the Constitution" LINK that's now open FREE to all Americans . . . so we can increase the number of citizens that have read the Constitution by more than 1,000,000 citizens (or more) reading the Constitution in the next few weeks?
  • Yes
  • No

~~~

U.S. Constitution

Amendments 1-10 to the U.S. Constitution

Amendments 11-27 to the U.S. Constitution



(From The Paragraph.) [Sources & Notes]


 * * *

By Quinn Hungeski, TheParagraph.com, Copyright (CC BY-ND) 2013

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (17+ / 0-)

    The Paragraph: “We dance round in a ring and suppose, But the Secret sits in the middle and knows.” - Robert Frost

    by hungeski on Sun Jul 07, 2013 at 07:56:14 PM PDT

  •  Thank you for this. When I get this crap in (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hungeski, Munchkn, Gordon20024, Lujane

    the mail, I throw it away; when it comes in an email I delete it and tag as spam so I don't have to see it again...

    ...maybe it's time to mess with them a bit more directly...

    "In a nation ruled by swine, all pigs are upward mobile..." - Dr. Hunter S. Thompson

    by Jack K on Sun Jul 07, 2013 at 08:31:47 PM PDT

    •  Yeah, I usually throw this crap away too. But this (0+ / 0-)

      one was too rich, and I wanted to counter its claims. It's not the usual type of political mail I get -- I think my address is still on some mailing list from the prior resident from 12 years ago.

      The Paragraph: “We dance round in a ring and suppose, But the Secret sits in the middle and knows.” - Robert Frost

      by hungeski on Mon Jul 08, 2013 at 07:23:55 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Wall Street (8+ / 0-)

    Nice Work.

    I particularly enjoyed your stinger at the end of question 3.

    A solid case can be made that the financial services sector is three times as large as is appropriate for an economy the size of the United States.

    In dollar terms this translates into $750 billion per year that is diverted away from productive uses.  

    As an example of the waste of human capital, half of the graduating classes of Princeton and Harvard get siphoned off into financial services and consulting; this depletes the ranks of those who go on to become doctors and professors and all the other positions that we would like to fill with bright, highly motivated youngsters.  I think this is a tragic waste of talent, which harms our nation.

    Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies have nothing to lose but their chains -Marx (-8.75,-8.36)

    by alain2112 on Sun Jul 07, 2013 at 09:06:51 PM PDT

    •  On top of that, it's more corrupt than ever -- (7+ / 0-)

      according to the major "Shock Doctrine" character, Jeffrey Sachs. He said in April:

      http://www.nypost.com/...

      “I meet a lot of these people on Wall Street on a regular basis right now,” Sachs told the conference, hosted earlier this month by the nonprofit Global Interdependence Center. “I am going to put it very bluntly: I regard the moral environment as pathological. And I am talking about the human interactions . . . I’ve not seen anything like this, not felt it so palpably.”

      Sachs said these same people on Wall Street are out to make billions of dollars, and believe nothing should stop them from doing that. “They have no responsibility to pay taxes; they have no responsibility to their clients; they have no responsibility to people, to counterparties in transactions,” he said. “They are tough, greedy, aggressive and feel absolutely out of control in a quite literal sense, and they have gamed the system to a remarkable extent.”

      The Paragraph: “We dance round in a ring and suppose, But the Secret sits in the middle and knows.” - Robert Frost

      by hungeski on Sun Jul 07, 2013 at 09:30:35 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  I find your changes as misleading as the original (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Gygaxian, hungeski, kyril, Lujane

    The original has a definite right tilt, your changes are decidedly left tilt.

    If your looking for fairness, this ain't it.

    That said, I do think your changes bring a much needed factual basis to it.

    What I would prefer to see, is to remove the "right-wing" as you removed "liberal" from the original.  "Traditional" and "Adaptive to the changes in society" might work better than loaded words like conservative and progressive.

    Don't include names. Really.

    The reason is that our society has gotten so polarized that certain words are triggers to rally to one side or the other. Names are a flag to rally around or despise. All rational thought and critical thinking goes out the window. You no longer have people offering an opinion, you have rabid fans rioting.

    Unless all your really interested in is propagandizing and raising money for pointless exercises in futility (Question 8), which is downright disgusting.

     

    I am much too liberal to be a Democrat.

    by WiseFerret on Sun Jul 07, 2013 at 10:01:57 PM PDT

    •  One of my aims was ridicule of this shallow (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Lujane

      fundraising ploy and its twisted logic. I was trying to leave as much of the original text as I could, while bringing in some facts and swinging it around to what I feel are more relevant questions.

      In question 8, I only ask that the reader share the link to the Constitution text. But I expect we will fall short of 1,000,000 new readers. :-)

      Your comments are food for thought, but what exactly is misleading?

      The Paragraph: “We dance round in a ring and suppose, But the Secret sits in the middle and knows.” - Robert Frost

      by hungeski on Sun Jul 07, 2013 at 10:48:25 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  advertising money for limbaugh? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hungeski

    hillsdale is a limbaugh sponsor so he hypes it up regularly

    i wonder how much of that money's actually going to radio/limbaugh to help counter the boycott, as a way to help keep him going.

    This is a list of 76 universities for Rush Limbaugh that endorse global warming denial, racism, sexism, and GOP lies by broadcasting sports on over 170 Limbaugh radio stations.

    by certainot on Mon Jul 08, 2013 at 07:16:57 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site