Skip to main content

I was inspired to write this when I read yesterday’s diary, KKK begins recruitment drive in Missouri. That diary recounts recent events in Lexington, in central Missouri. I could summarize those events here, but the only summary really needed is in the title. I recommend reading it.  Anyway, it made me think about how much has changed, how much has not, and how much the actions of a very few individuals can make a difference, even if the world largely ignores them at the time. And it did all that because it's talking about race relations in Missouri, a state I've never visited but have spent some time learning something about.

I do have a fleeting but real ancestral connection to that part of Missouri. Between 1850 and 1860, four of my 3x great grandparents had moved to central Missouri, settling in the Boonville area (about 74 miles east of Lexington and roughly midway between Kansas City and St. Louis), part of a huge wave of German immigrants. One of my 2x great grandparents was born in Boonville and she and her future husband both grew to adulthood there, before moving to Kansas.  

It is through the line of these German forebears that I have direct ancestors who fought in the Civil War. Three direct ancestors who lived in Boonville fought for the Union (Georg Groh, Stephen Leer, and Adolph Sandrock), plus near relatives who did the same. However, the focus of this diary is not on them, although they do play an extremely small part. Instead, the main focus is on a story I discovered while researching their military service, a story that I think deserves a wider audience, the true and practically unknown story and import of the Second Battle of Boonville in the Civil War.

If you follow me over the fold, I'll show you why this should matter to other Americans, even ones whose families never went anywhere near Missouri.

Two of the Civil War soldiers I mentioned above, Adolph Sandrock and Jacob Groh (son of Georg), both served in the Boonville Home Guard, which was a Union unit. The Boonville Home Guard wasn't very big and later got folded into other units (which included the units holding the other relations named), but it did fight a few battles before that time. Such as the Second Battle of Boonville. Now, unless you are a devoted Civil War buff, this requires at least a little bit of background. The Second Battle of Boonville cannot be explained without brief mention of the First. And why anyone should care about either of them at this juncture may not be immediately clear. Neither battle had casualties in any way comparable to the much more famous battles of the Civil War, such as First Bull Run, Second Bull Run, Antietam, Cold Harbor, Gettysburg, the Battle of the Wilderness, and too many others. So, without going into exhaustive detail,  I’ll show why both the Boonville battles were important, more so even than people who are Civil War buffs might appreciate.

The First Battle of Boonville (AKA the Battle of Boonville) took place on June 17, 1861. This makes it one of the very first land battles of the Civil War, occurring before the First Battle of Bull Run, which took place the following month. The Federal troops, numbering about 1400 men (who were NOT from Boonville), easily routed the approximately 500 completely unprepared members of the Missouri State Guard. As the Wikipedia article for the Battle of Boonville states (bolding added by me):

Although casualties were extremely light, the battle's strategic impact was far greater than one might assume from its limited nature. The Union victory established what would become an unbroken Federal control of the Missouri River, and helped to thwart efforts to bring Missouri into the Confederacy.
The real impact of the Battle of Boonville was strategic, far out of proportion to the minimal loss of life. The Battle of Boonville effectively ejected the secessionist forces from the center of Missouri, and secured the state for the Union. Price realized he could not hold Lexington and retreated, though he would return three months later to re-take the city. Secessionist communications to the strongly pro-Confederate Missouri River valley were effectively cut, and would-be recruits from slave-owning regions north of the Missouri River found it difficult to join the Southern army. Provisions and supplies also could no longer be obtained from this section of the state.

A second result of the battle was demoralization. While the Missouri State Guard would fight and win on other days (most notably at Wilson's Creek and Lexington just two and three months later, respectively), it was badly dispirited by this early defeat. Lyon's victory gave the Union forces time to consolidate their hold on the state…

All true, or almost so (I’ll explain the caveat in a bit). And to this day, the importance of this particular battle is recognized. But what about the second Battle of Boonville? It does not have its own Wikipedia page, being relegated to “Other battles at Boonville” on the same page as its more celebrated predecessor. Here is what is said about it there (and what is said on the Wikipedia site is very typical of what is said in other venues):
Following the battle of June 17, Boonville would serve as the scene for three other Civil War engagements, all of extremely minor importance:

Second Battle of Boonville

The Second Battle of Boonville was fought on September 13, 1861, when Colonel William Brown of the Missouri State Guard led 800 men in an attack on 140 pro-Union Boonville Home Guardsmen while the Union soldiers were eating breakfast. Due to rain, the Confederates wrapped their flags in black sheathing, which the Home Guard mistook as a sign of no quarter. Highly motivated by a perception that the fight was one of "victory or death", the Home Guardsmen managed to defeat the State Guard troops, killing Colonel Brown in the process.

A nothing battle, just a footnote. Or…maybe not. It is at least possible that it was there that a handful of former slaves changed the course of the war. Because that bit about how the First Battle of Boonville “effectively ejected the secessionist forces from the center of Missouri, and secured the state for the Union” wasn’t really quite true, was it? In fact, what we see even in the text above is that the Confederacy-sympathizing Missouri State Guard, far from being a “demoralized” and “dispirited” force in fact in this engagement numbered 800 men (more than in the first battle that had “effectively ejected” them from the center of Missouri) and were at this time facing Union troops (part of a "home guard") numbering only 140, one tenth the number in the two Federal volunteer regiments, a company of U.S. regulars and a battery of artillery that had defeated them before. As it happens, the plan of the Confederate sympathizers wasn’t simply to defeat the home guard troops, but to capture a large amount of arms and ammunition. It was fortunate indeed that the Union troops were not taken by surprise and that the commander of the State Guard troops was taken out of action early in the engagement, or, who knows, Missouri might have contributed far more to the rebel cause than it did. So, exactly how did surprise fail and how did that commander die?

I am going to quote here (with permission) from The Negro Soldier in the Second Battle of Boonville: The Earliest Combat Soldier, written and contributed to the Cooper County, Missouri Genealogical Web Site by James F. Thoma (I did add links to the relevant letters).

September 15, 1861, Sunday
Nancy Jones and her husband, Caleb, were strong southern sympathizers living several miles west of Boonville. In a letter written to her daughter in San Antonio, Texas only days after the Second Battle of Boonville, she sheds a different light on some of the events of that battle. She recounts to her daughter,
I send you an account of the last “Boonville battle” which is nearer the truth then any thing I have seen published. The writer, however, neglected to mention, that three runaway negro’s joined the home gaurd and told them of Colonel [William B.] Browns plans, which was the cause of citizens being arrested as hostages. These negroes were in the entrenchments during the fight, they had guns given them, and are said by the prisnors who saw them, to have fought bravely, one of then is a splendid shot, he knew the Browns, and claims the killing of them. Colonel Eppstein retains those negroes, and refuses to give them up to their masters; you can well imagine what a corrupting effect that has on others.
This is the first recorded account of Negro soldiers in the Second Battle of Boonville. It explains the source of information that Joseph Eppstein relied upon in believing that his garrison would come under attack. Never knowing whether a white man was a Union man or a Confederate sympathizer was always a problem. A Negro could be trusted to provide honest information as they understood the information. Additionally, this account places Negro soldiers as combatants in the engagement and credits one of them with the killing of the Confederate commander.

September 17, 1861, Monday [LVP: actually Tuesday]
Michael Fellman in his book “Inside War: The Guerrilla Conflict in Missouri During the American Civil War” quotes a letter from Daniel R. Smith to his parents. The letter written September 17, 1861 states:

Five negroes brought the news of the intended attack and were inside the entrenchment during the engagement. Among them was a slave of Col. Brown’s. Whilst fighting he took hold of a gun and shot his master who fell and soon after expired. The darky is tickled almost to death.
This letter again explains from whom Colonel Joseph Eppstein, on September 5, 1861, received his information that rebel forces would attack Boonville. The information would have even more credibility to Eppstein, considering that a slave of Colonel William B. Brown provided the information. Finally this account also places the Negroes as active participants in the fight and again credits a Negro as killing the leader of the Confederate forces.

October 6, 1861, Sunday
Letters concerning the Negro involvement in the Second Battle of Boonville and written when the event occurred is certainly credible evidence. However, more evidence can be gleaned from the official records of events of the Civil War. At this stage in the War of the Rebellion, the slaves had not been freed. The question now in the mind of Joseph Eppstein was how to protect the slaves who had aided him. The dilemma was eventually addressed to the Adjutant General of the Army of the West in this missive sent by John C. Kelton.

Boonville, Mo., October 6, 1861.


Headquarters Army of the West, Jefferson City.

SIR: I send by the Northerner in charge of Captain Renfro, Ninth Regiment Missouri Volunteers, several slaves who having given important information to Major Eppstein while in command of this post which saved his command from surprise now seek protection from their masters who threaten to kill them. Major Eppstein cannot longer protect them. I therefore send them to Jefferson City where they can work on the fortifications.

Very respectfully,


Colonel, Commanding.

While not acknowledging the Negroes direct involvement as combatants in the Second Battle of Boonville, this communiqué further confirms and supports the unofficial records. It does acknowledge that the information provided to Eppstein was important and saved his command.

November 30, 1861, Saturday
The final article presented as proof of negro combatants in the Second Battle of Boonville also comes from the official government records. In this record, Isaac P. Jones wrote to Major General Henry Wager Halleck, to inform him of a situation that existed in Boonville.

DEAR SIR: I am a native of East Hartford, Conn., and am now visiting this State to induce a widowed sister and her family to return to that vicinity where our parents, much advanced in years, reside; that my sister and her family now residing in a disturbed locality (being in Johnson County) may escape troubles and dangers growing out of the sad condition of affairs in Western Missouri and relieve us at home of great uneasiness on her account. Being detained in this neighborhood several days expecting a friend who per appointment was to meet me here I have become somewhat informed as to local matters which as a good and loyal citizen I briefly make known to you. I do not do this obstrusively nor expect that my advice is of great importance but simply as a witness, from the fact that it is impossible for you to enforce obedience and punish willful disobedience and contempt or disregard of your authority unless you are specifically made acquainted with abuses in the localities under your military command where they abound.

Much will never reach you for the simple reason that resident inhabitants are afraid to complain, and it [is] as a precaution in my own behalf proper for me to say to you that I am in personal danger of the Boonville Home Guards could they identify me as the author of the inclosed communication. Every one who ventures to complain or dissent from their malpractices is denounced as a secessionist in league with the enemy. They are composed mainly of the rudest portion of the German population, and there is no reasoning with them allowed on the part or in behalf of abused civilians. The captains of the two companies were recently keepers of drinking houses and one of them still keeps his “doggery.” I mention this merely to show you the kind of material U. S. captains are made of in this locality.

I have had a good opportunity of forming an opinion of the temper of the people of Missouri having made two protracted visits to the State within the last twelvemonth, and it is my candid opinion from a loyal standpoint that the mismanagement of Federal advisers in this State has made more enmity to the Government than any influence to be attributed to Jeff. Davis, Governor Jackson or all the secessionists combined for three-fourths of those now in arms and hostile to the Government disavow belief in the dogma of the “right of secession.”

Your recent orders published in the Saint Louis daily papers concerning the harboring of runaway of fugitive slaves within the lines or within the camp and prohibition against the unauthorized seizure of persons and arbitrary appropriation and destruction of private property (evils or I may say barbarities practiced by the so-called “home guards” in this county to a serious extent) promise security and would do much to restore confidence among the people did they believe that they would be obeyed. If rigidly enforced they would go far to tranquilize the State and put a “damper” on successful recruiting for Price’s army.

But your orders are not obeyed here, and the reply to me when I have cited your orders to prove that this war is neither an abolition war nor a sectional war to devastate the South is that “the orders will not be enforced by subordinates,” and “if General Halleck should enforce them the immediate advisers of the President in this State will have him displaced.” They invariably ask, “How are General Halleck's orders enforced here since published?” And I say with shame to that subordination which should exist that I can afford no satisfactory answer beyond the only presumption that you are not advised of such abuses.

It is known as a fact not disputed here by any one that sundry runaway slaves, three or four at least, are now openly harbored in the camp of the home guards at the fair-grounds at this post and all efforts of their owners to recover them have proven fruitless. These same slaves often appear in U. S. uniform and on one occasion at least had U. S. arms placed in their hands and acted the part of U. S. soldiers inside of the intrenchments here. Surely the Government is not so hard off for soldiers that we have to arm negroes to sustain it. If so I am for peace. When it comes to arming negroes to shoot down and slay our rebellious Southern kindred I, a loyal Connecticut Yankee and proud of the name, will have no hand in it unless I turn rebel against such an infamous policy; but I am for the Union as our fathers fashioned it and all righteous efforts to preserve the same.

Several weeks ago a Mr. Marr, a citizen of Saline County, called upon Colonel Barnes, in command of this post, to recover a negro man belonging to him named Jim. Colonel Barnes (as I learned) upon the advice of Judge George W. Miller, judge of the circuit court (and a prominent Union man), gave Marr an order for his negro then in camp addressed to Major Eppstein,* of the home guards. Major Eppstein said the negro was not in his possession but Captain Biehle had him. The order was then amended addressed to Captain Biehle. Captain Biehle told Mr. Marr to look for his negro but when Marr attempted to do so he was followed by home guards and assailed with clubs and stones until he was compelled to flee for personal safety. Upon a representation of these facts to Colonel Barnes (who has no sufficient force to enforce obedience on the part of home guards) he was advised by Colonel Barnes to go home and offer $100 reward for his negro. This Marr did not do and his negro is still in camp here harbored by home guards.

Hence it is that people here say that your orders in reference to fugitive slaves forbidding them in camp will not be obeyed by subordinates out of your sight, and they cite existing facts here and the recent conduct of Lane and Jennison in evidence of such a belief. To put a correction to this flagrant abuse will I believe require nothing less than the presence of a resolute regular U. S. officer with competent skill, will and authority (and it might be force) to right matters. No such officer is here now it is evident or your instructions would be rigidly enforced.

* * * *

For the facts which I have communicated I refer you to Judge George W. Miller (of circuit court), Judge Lionberger (of county court), Judge Smith (of probate court), and Doctor Trigg, banker, all Union men avowed of position and property. If you dispatch an officer to investigate matters here it will be of great service to the Union cause, if he diligently and with determination does his duty.

Very respectfully, your obedient servant,


Okay, first, that last letter writer Isaac P. Jones comes off as a truly massive prick. However, he was hardly unique for his time in his awfulness, so I’ll leave him be, mostly. I should thank him, really, because he makes a wonderful demonstration of my frequent contention that bigotry had just as comfortable a home in the North as it did in the South. He's as much the ideological ancestor of the modern KKK as Nathan Bedford Forrest. Also, he makes me kinda proud of my ancestors, the ones in that unit. Sure, they were part of that “rudest portion of the German population” he so disdained, in that they were farmers with accents and little money (although Jones may have been also thinking of the name Eppstein and cramming in some anti-Semitism as well; I can’t say). And sure, they were part of that group of German lower class immigrants who were feared and scorned by the Know Nothing Party and the other nativists of the day—the insulting term (because there's always an insulting term) for them was, for some reason, to call them “dutch”—but there in central Missouri it was they who were on the right side of history. And they knew, appreciated, and protected the people who had helped protect and save them. It wasn’t Mr. Isaac P. Jones, sorta-kinda proud Connecticut Yankee (not too proud to threaten a government official with potential treason if his prejudices weren’t pandered to) who had risked his life to come to give them warning of a vastly superior force about to attack their position and who took up arms alongside them. No. It was a small group of ex-slaves who did that, and damned if they were going to give them up to be sent back to bondage and death, whatever authority said about it.

Is it plausible that it wouldn’t have made any difference at all to the length, difficulty, or outcome of the Civil War if those black men (or men and women) with names unrecorded by history hadn’t done what they did? Yes, it's plausible. Maybe the Union forces in Boonville would have won anyway, despite surprise and inferior numbers. Maybe any possible loss would not have mattered. “What if” games are easy to play, but scoring them is hard. But knowing all the facts, isn’t it also plausible to imagine a potential pivot point there, right near the beginning of the war?

I wish I knew what happened to those brave ex-slaves. I hope their descendants, if any, preserved for at least a time what their ancestors had done. Regardless, I'll honor them. If they didn't save the Union (an untestable assertion), they at a minimum did a lot to save my relatives, and got no credit in the history books for doing so, either.

* * * *

Postscript: regarding my relatives mentioned above, the war for the most part did not treat them as well as they’d treated it. My 3x great grandfather Stephen Leer died near the end of the war in June 1864 from a self-inflicted but completely accidental gunshot wound. He was on stable duty and running after an escaped horse when he slipped in some mud and his holstered revolver discharged and shot him in the side of the stomach. It took him two weeks to die. Fortunately, accidental gunshot wounds never happen any more.

His father in law, my 4x great grandfather Adolph Sandrock, was on scouting duty when his scouting column crossed a rotten bridge that collapsed under his horse. When the horse fell, it fell on him, leaving him crippled for the remainder of the conflict and with a limp to the end of his days. He died, sick and alone, in 1897 in a Soldiers’ Home, in Orting, Washington, mooching off the government. Fortunately, illness and financial insecurity late in life are likewise things we never have to worry about any more.

My 2x great granduncle Jacob Groh lived through the war and was kept on for Indian-fighting duty, but was insubordinate and appears to have deserted and either died or changed his name, as he completely disappears after the last record of military service ordering he be located for discipline.

His father, my 3x great grandfather Georg Groh, whose son (named after him but Anglicized to George, my 2x great grandfather) later married the daughter of Stephen Leer, was the only one I can say lived to a reasonably happy old age, although he too needed more medical help than he could afford in his later years. In addition to his son George, he had several other descendants who were named after him, including but not limited to my great grandfather George Groh, a businessman and mayor in Emporia, Kansas, my granduncle George Groh, a journalist who covered the Felix Longoria controversy in 1949 as well as an author who wrote a number of books, including one in 1972 entitled The Black Migration: The Journey to Urban America, and my father, George Groh Sheridan, whose story isn’t over yet but who was a union organizer for about eight years with the UFW under César Chávez and is now a teacher on the national board of the NEA.

I’m proud of all of them, and would spit in the eye of anyone who says that the immigration of “the rudest portion” (or words to the same effect) of any people or group is bad for this country. On the contrary—it has given this country whatever greatness it can claim to have had.

Originally posted to leftist vegetarian patriot on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 06:19 PM PDT.

Also republished by History for Kossacks, Genealogy and Family History Community, Show Me Kos, and Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks for the info. I am a Missourian.... (8+ / 0-)

    and appreciate your well written informative diary.

    Eric Cantor can kiss my big old Missouri butt!"

    by cyncynical on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 06:33:09 PM PDT

  •  family in MO (11+ / 0-)

    grandfather's family lived there for quite a while, too.
    This is a great story. I can just see it as a movie, especially the scenes with the ex-slaves getting weapons and shooting back. Would have to include a scene with Isaac P. (as in prick) Jones and his whining ass.

  •  Very well written and informative. Always (15+ / 0-)

    interested in any insight into the Civil War and this is some real inside information I've never heard of.  Many brave runaway slaves helped the Union overthrow the rebels and free all the slaves those rebels were fighting so hard to keep.

    Whenever you hear anyone talk about "states' rights," being the reason for the Civil War, remind them those "rights" they were fighting for were the "rights" to own people.

    Best. President. Ever.

    by Little Lulu on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 06:55:47 PM PDT

  •  Republished to the Genealogy and Family History (8+ / 0-)

    Community group.

    My own German ancestors settled in Wisconsin and Iowa, but many of the relatives of the Germans from Northwest Germany (near Holland) moved to Missouri.  So I often have to go trekking through the Missouri records to locate the siblings.

    Oh, and Isaac P. Jones can stuff it.

    Wonderful diary.  Thanks for posting!

  •  I'm glad you wrote this diary and that CS (9+ / 0-)

    picked it up.
    I have no idea whether this particular battle was indeed a pivot point, but I can believe that the participation of the men fleeing bondage made a positive difference for the Union.
    I'm not usually a bloodthirsty person, but I am glad that the former "slave" shot his "master." Some small retribution there. Would that it had never been necessary for him to do so much for his basic human rights.

    Some DKos series & groups worth your while: Black Kos, Native American Netroots, KosAbility, Monday Night Cancer Club. If you'd like to join the Motor City Kossacks, send me a Kosmail.

    by peregrine kate on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 08:50:01 PM PDT

  •  republished to Show Me Kos (8+ / 0-)

    the Missouri Kossack thread.

  •  Proud (7+ / 0-)

    to say my great-grandfather served in the 9th Missouri State Militia Calvary Union and the 13th Missouri Calvary Union.  He was born in Boone Co. Missouri. Not far from Booneville. He was 15 years old when he enlisted.  He claimed to be 18 and three years later when he re-enlisted he said he was 18. Neat trick Grandpa. His name was James B. Payne.  Glad he was on the right side of history.

    Thank you for your thoughtful diary on the war in Missouri.  The history of the Civil War in Missouri gets a passing mention if at all when it comes to the history of the war.

    The War Machine will pry my 25 and 22 year old sons from my cold dead fingers.

    by Momagainstthedraft on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 09:57:51 PM PDT

  •  Great diary, thanks! (8+ / 0-)

    My husband is also descended from some of those rude Germans from Boonville.  From what I recall of my Cooper County research, some of the good citizens in the area were critical and suspicious of those rude Boonville Germans during World War I as well.  Many enlisted just to prove their allegiance to the US.

    Great story.  Isn't the troop hdqtrs or something from that battle (Thespian Hall) still standing?

    Great little town, part of Missouri's great history of German immigrants who established communities along the river.

    "If you can't take their money, eat their food, drink their booze and then vote against them, you have no business being in DC."

    by Betty Pinson on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 10:02:20 PM PDT

  •  "Kingdom of Callaway" here (7+ / 0-)

    My county borders on the Missouri River and major crops in the bottoms were tobacco and hemp. Labor intensive crops whose labor was provided by slaves. Extreme Southern sympathies (to this day) that earned its nickname as "Little Dixie. In 1875 Jefferson Davis paid a visit and spoke at the fairgrounds to a crowd estimated to be about 15,000. The house Davis slept in that night still stands overlooking the town.

    My maternal g-grandfather was a farmer near Lexington and was named after the Confederate General Sterling Price when he was born in 1861. Whereas my fraternal g-grandfather enlisted in the 4th New York Heavy Artillery in 1861.  The paths taken by ancestors are fascinating to say the least.

    "What really matters is what you do with what you have." H. G. Wells

    by spunhard on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 10:02:57 PM PDT

  •  German influence in MO in Civil War (6+ / 0-)

    Your diary is prompting me to search for info regarding my MO German ancestors, who settled in Central MO, near the Osage and Missouri river junction. Perhaps you'd care to comment on why, in your opinion, these MO Germans were more apt to be Union loyalists, rather than join their fellow farmers in supporting slavery? Economically, I can see that the farmers of the "river bottom lands" along the rivers might welcome slavery to till their huge one crop farms. The Germans, who arrived (1840s and on) to settle the still available but less arable hill country, with smaller acreage, would thus be less apt to "keep" slaves.
    There'd be the language barrier between the newcomer Germans and the more established English/Scots/Irish bottom land farmers, I guess, and maybe religious, too? Your thoughts? I am dismayed to learn of the KKK recruitment. May their efforts come to nada. The efforts of the slaves in Union ranks is still helping Missourians to this day: Lincoln University, a historically black state college in Jefferson City, was founded by African American Union soldiers, to educate their race. It of course is now integrated, which allowed many of us more recent German ancestry folk to earn a college education. Thanks for your great diary!

    •  Here are a few explanations. (11+ / 0-)
      "Many German immigrants were veterans of the 1848 "Peasant Revolution"..they fought a losing war against...feudal domination."

      Serfdom was a form of slavery. Many could see the parallel between the Southern "slave baron" vs. the feudal baron that denied peasants the right to own land in the old fatherland. Furthermore, some Southern born Missouri nativists were anti-immigrant. So this created a wedge that formed between the German "Forty-Eighters" and Gov. Claiborne Jackson's government. Yes, there were many exceptions, many Germans also fought for the South, but this was the general trend that the majority of Missouri's German immigrant population followed.

      "Many could see the parallel between the Southern "slave baron" vs. the feudal baron that denied peasants the right to own land in the old fatherland."

      That is why, ever since the death of pro-immigrant Sen. Thomas Hart Benton (Democrat), the German majority supported the "Free Soil" and later the Republican Party. Lincoln knew he could count on Missouri Germans when the time came to preserve the Union against breaking it up into "small-statism".


      Join us on the Black Kos front porch to review news and views written from a black pov—everyone is welcome.

      by TomP on Thu Jul 11, 2013 at 08:12:08 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I thank you! (5+ / 0-)

        I am chagrined to not have looked into German history for the answers, and I'm delighted that you did.'Appreciate your reply.

        •  TomP covered at least half of it, maybe more, (8+ / 0-)

          and that link is wonderful. The other part of it (or an other part of it--there may be more facets to this) is that close proximity slavery was very clearly bad for the nonslaveowning working class, as it competed with them and devalued their labor.

          If you were a farmer who couldn't afford to buy slaves or were morally opposed, you were competing completely out of your class in the economic sphere against a nearby richer or less scrupled farmer. Your situation was even worse if you were a farm laborer. Even among native-born Americans, this was recognized, which was a big part of the reason for Northern opposition to the spread of slavery into new territories. But native-born Americans in slaveowning states were bought off, to a large extent, by the artificial system of color caste. They might be poor, but at least they were white. Immigrants were somewhat less likely to fall for that bait-and-switch (fake status in exchange for lower standard of living), at least in the first generation. Successive generations could and generally did allow themselves to be bought off that way--see Ignatiev's How the Irish Became White.

          My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.
          --Carl Schurz, remarks in the Senate, February 29, 1872

          by leftist vegetarian patriot on Thu Jul 11, 2013 at 08:55:39 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  Here's an insight on Germans in Little Dixie... (3+ / 0-)


      5TH DISTRICT (Following letter is misfiled, and belongs in the 9th district, #4409)
      #4344 - LETTERS RECEIVED.  1863-65.  


      Fulton  August 19th 1863
      Capt W F Switzler
           Provost Marshal 9th Dist

      Dear Sir.

           We had but just commenced enrolling under the plan suggested by you, when instructions come to hand, forbidding enrolling officers, requiring persons subject to enrollment, to meet them at designated times and places.  This will soon put a stop to the business here; as no man of sense can be found, who could be induced “to proceed in the regular way”, unless under an escort.  Our County to day is practicaly in the hand of Brushwhackers.  I will mention some of their recent acts.  On Fryday the 7th inst William Cook a German living 11 miles from Fulton, and not far from Reedsville, was ordered to leave the County in ten days or suffer death.  He advertised his property to be sold at auction on yesterday; in the mean time he sold what he could privately.  On Monday night he was called on for all the money he had received, which he gave up.  He was then tied with a rope about his neck, dragged about and partialy choked to death, but finaly released on condition that he go to a neighbour, and borrow a sum of money, and deliver over to them, pledging the proceeds of his sale for the payment, which he did.  They called the same night, on an aged man by the name of Thoms, living near Cook.  tied him up by the neck and partialy hung him; compelled him also to go and borrow money for them; he tried but did not obtain it.  They then released him on condition, that he shall by Saturday of the present week, pay them $100 in gold.  He went to Portland yesterday and probably got the amount.  Mr. Dickman living in Fulton, Son in=law to Mr. Thomas called on the commander of this Post this morning for Military assistance, to go and move the old man up here: but was advised by that officer, to send a boy down and bring the money away.  Now I stand responsible for the truth of what I write.  and I could fill sheets with like transactions  I trust this is sufficient, to give you a just and adequate conception of our condition; my object being to impress upon your mind, the importance of having troops sent here immediately.  We have the name of being protected by a military force; when the fact is, the Capt of that force dare not go down in the locality named, for fear of being Brushwhacked and whipped.  Here they are in quarters, scarcely able to guard their own arms and ammunition, and they know it;  The citizens fear a night attack upon their property.
           Wm J Jackson our present representation in the Legislature, keeps a Mill and Smith Shop.  He met the somewhat distinguished Col Cobb at his shop on yesterday morning, spoke to him telling him he supposed him dead.  Cobb stammeringly answered.  “I scratched out”  Cobb ordered some horse shoes made to be ready at a certain hour.  Jackson attended Cooks sale, and on his return, learned that Cobb and his men were camped near the mill; some of them had ordered, and obtained dinner at Jacksons house.  Jackson went in search of the camp, and found it within half a mile.  He got on an eminence and called to know wether he could come in, and was answered in the affirmative.  He spoke to Cobb; asked him the nature of his mission? what he expected to accomplish etc.  Cobb told him he had no time for conversation; that he had a long distance to travel that night; and being just ready to mount when Jackson came, they rode off.  I got the above from Jackson himself.
           Now what is to become of us in Callaway. Cook and Thomas are, or were, owners of real estate: both good Loyal and useful citizens.  Cook is stripped of about all he possessed: parted with his funds after the sale of his all.  taking the best rout he could, on foot, to avoid pursuit, leaving his family be hind, to follow on.  But this is not the worst feature.  Robbing and plundering is not all they do: they lay violent hands upon the women of these families, and outrage their persons.  Some of them are now in the habit of sleeping in their cornfields: to avoid these worse than murderers.  These Germans are living in Neighborhoods of Secessionists, many of whom abhor such acts, others of them are well known to have encouraged and assisted them.
           Enclosed I send Mr. Thomas’ Official Oath.  He will enter upon his duties when called on.  In our present embarrasments, I dont see as he can assist us much.  When may we look for the troops of which you spoke.  and how many?  Give us the troops and the enrollment shall be pushed ahead with prudence and good judgement, and with no unnecessary harshness.  Messrs Bird and Thomas are certainly both most excellent selections.
           We are in want of some documentary envelopes; there are none for sale in this city.  It appears to me the Government should furnish us all necessary stationary.  Who shall we draw on from them?  if from your Office, is it necessary to fill a requisition and send it to Head qrs for approval?  I shall be pleased to receive instructions with regard to an Office.  am I authorized to rent a suitable place at Government expense.  please post me up.  When I have time I will make an apology for the great length of this epistle.

      Yery Truly, Your Obt Servt
      Hiram Cornell
      Deputy Provost Mar

      P.S.  Mr. Bird comes in.  I submit what I have written to him.  He says he just learned by special dispatch that Brushwhackers were near this town last night.  they sent him word that he could enroll Fulton and no more.  that they should burn every man out, who lives in the country, as soon as they find out they have enrolled against the Southern Confederacy.


      "There is no way to give to honest toil its just reward--its full share of all wealth produced--but by the full application of the single tax. And righteousness and justice require it to be done." --A. Moll, 1897

      by Zwenkau on Fri Jul 12, 2013 at 08:31:21 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  So it isn't surprising that when the Germans (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        B52D, Zwenkau, RiveroftheWest

        making up the vast majority of the Boonville Home Guard believed themselves about to be attacked by a much larger force, they took the precaution of taking hostages of 15 of the most prominent secessionists in Boonville. The Second Battle of Boonville would have ended very differently otherwise. After putting up a highly spirited defense (which resulted in the deaths of almost all of the Confederate leaders, as noted in the linked article and referenced above) the Home Guard was pushed back to within Thespian Hall, as their fortifications had been breached. It was at that point that under a flag of truce a cessation of hostilities was reached, but only by threatening the lives of the hostages they had taken.

        I'm fairly sure this was completely against the code of "civilized conduct" expected in war, but in central Missouri, as in many other places in the Civil War, that code was completely ignored by both sides. And, even so, had the leaders of the Missouri State Guard in this engagement not already been killed, it is at least possible and maybe likely that they would have accepted the loss of those hostages for the gain of materiel they expected to win.

        My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.
        --Carl Schurz, remarks in the Senate, February 29, 1872

        by leftist vegetarian patriot on Fri Jul 12, 2013 at 08:56:21 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Great diary (5+ / 0-)

    I'm from Illinois and have travelled through Missouri extensively. I love studying the history of that area.

    And it just goes to show you no matter how long it's been there are still new stories to be told.

    I ask him if he was warm enough? "Warm," he growled, "I haven't been warm since Bastogne."

    by Unrepentant Liberal on Thu Jul 11, 2013 at 08:06:14 AM PDT

  •  Tipped and recced, LVP. Thank you. (5+ / 0-)

    One of the things I love about my crazy home state is that our history seems to be a condensed version of the entire history of the United States. It's all here.

    My great-grandfather, source of the family name, seems to have been a Confederate soldier who was captured in North Carolina, switched sides and served out the rest of the Civil War for the Union, settled in Missouri and spent the rest of his life collecting veteran's benefits for chronic health issues he attributed to wartime service. He was also quite the rascal in terms of family-- left one family somewhere in the Carolinas and had at least two more after he settled in Missouri.

    I was once told he eventually died of poisoning after trying to self-medicate with "horse medicine," but that the key ingredient was jimsonweed-- which is poisonous but also a potent hallucinogen. Ah granddad.

  •  Terrific story - thank you! (5+ / 0-)

    You have everything you need to create the wiki article, too. I hope you go for it!

    We all understand that freedom isn't free. What Romney and Ryan don't understand is that neither is opportunity. We have to invest in it.
    Julian Castro, DNC 4 Sept 2012

    by pixxer on Thu Jul 11, 2013 at 12:05:40 PM PDT

    •  Huh. That's true. (4+ / 0-)

      I hadn't even really considered that, as I've never done any editing or contribution on Wikipedia, but I certainly will consider it. I'd want to go into considerably more detail than I did here regarding the various precautions taken by the Home Guard that enabled them to win, but I I know where to go to get that information.


      My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.
      --Carl Schurz, remarks in the Senate, February 29, 1872

      by leftist vegetarian patriot on Thu Jul 11, 2013 at 12:10:09 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Every once in awhile you realize (4+ / 0-)

        that there is something you know more about than almost anyone else. It's kind of an amazing thought, isn't it? :) There are others out there who have data, but then, perhaps they will add in information to your article!

        We all understand that freedom isn't free. What Romney and Ryan don't understand is that neither is opportunity. We have to invest in it.
        Julian Castro, DNC 4 Sept 2012

        by pixxer on Thu Jul 11, 2013 at 12:43:33 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site