Skip to main content

I have an idea that I haven't heard anyone talking about.  Why not change the Senate Filibuster to only apply when one party is in control of the Senate, the House of Representatives and the Presidency.

When one party has total control of the government you need the minority party to have some sort of check against totalitarianism.  When the opposition party has control of the House or Presidency the natural checks and balances of government kick in and the filibuster is irrelevant for legislation.

It should be an automatic rule that when one party has the trifecta, a 60 vote threshold can be enforced by the minority party.

Supreme Court nominations may fall under a different rule.  Maybe the filibuster is always applied to nominees or maybe if the court is split 4-4 and the nominee will shift the balance an automatic filibuster goes into effect.

Cabinet and Agency nominations should never be filibustered.  Reid is correct to do away with it.

There is no question in my mind the Republicans, lead by Mitch McConnell, are jumping for joy because Harry Reid might finally change the filibuster.  They will not hesitate one moment, if given the chance, to throw it out altogether and Harry Reid going nuclear is just the cover they need.  If you don't believe that, just look at what's going on in the states.

Republicans have defeated Voters Rights, Gerrymandered most of the country and over the next few years will change voting laws enough to force the trifecta majority they desire.  We shouldn't give them the excuse they're looking for to completely kill the filibuster which we will desperately want.  They might do it anyway, but won't be able to say 'The Democrats did the same thing'.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rjnerd, Gooserock, Lujane

    The only normal people are the ones you don't know very well - Joe Ancis

    by TexasJay on Sat Jul 13, 2013 at 03:40:37 PM PDT

  •  My Feeling Since It's the Numbers That Everyone (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    is up in arms over, why not simply impose a limit per year or per Congress in line with historic practice? Let the House minority retain its historic abilities to defend itself, while returning the majority to its historic ability to govern.

    I wouldn't doubt there may be some elements of procedure that need to be tweaked. Historically the filibuster had to be a speaking event which sounds good to me.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Sat Jul 13, 2013 at 05:16:47 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site