Skip to main content


NOAA’s Jane Lubchenco on ‘society’s wicked problems’

by Barry Bergman, NewsCenter -- Dec 10, 2012

[...]
“A baseball player who is on steroids is going to have a much higher probability of hitting lots and lots of home runs,” she said [Lubchenco]. “Now, you can’t turn around and say this particular home run was because of steroids. But you can say there are going to be a lot more home runs because this person is on steroids.

“I think the same is true,” she added, for the relationship between climate change and extreme weather. “We now have weather on steroids.”
[...]



“The real challenge to us collectively is… not just documenting changes, not just saying what the problems are, but really creating solutions,” she said, outlining a “social contract” for scientists. “And that means interdisciplinary approaches. It means engaging with society on a variety of spatial scales, and it means thinking differently about what our roles as scientists are.”


[ Source -- Communicating Climate Change: The “Isolated Weather Event” Problem ...ecopolitology.org ]



EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Don't tell the idiots at Daily Caller (6+ / 0-)

    Scientist tells senators: Global warming not causing extreme weather

    In a Senate hearing Thursday, environmental scientist Roger Pielke of the University of Colorado said it’s “incorrect” to claim that global warming is spurring more extreme weather disasters.

    “It is misleading and just plain incorrect to claim that disasters associated with hurricanes, tornadoes, floods or droughts have increased on climate timescales either in the United States or globally,” Pielke said in his testimony before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. “It is further incorrect to associate the increasing costs of disasters with the emission of greenhouse gases.”

    One scientist on the side of denialist is all it takes for them to deny.

    I stumbled on this today and was shocked by most of the comments.  I tried to post but for some reason I think they have banned me.

    Daily Kos an oasis of truth. Truth that leads to action.

    by Shockwave on Thu Jul 18, 2013 at 10:52:04 PM PDT

  •  I heard a good explanation (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    jamess, MKinTN, bumbi, Eric Nelson

    of climate change that refuted the claim that "a one or two degree increase in temperature is no big deal, because what's the problem if the temp is 72 instead of 70? Or 98 instead of 96? Or (in the winter) 34 instead of 32?"

    It's all about the extra heat (energy) in the atmosphere. If the overall temperature goes up, there's more evaporation from bodies of water (lakes and oceans). There might be bigger tornados and bigger hurricanes. Maybe more droughts (in some areas) or maybe bigger thunderstorms (in other areas), leading to bigger floods. More energy means more wind, too.

    "Stupid just can't keep its mouth shut." -- SweetAuntFanny's grandmother.

    by Dbug on Thu Jul 18, 2013 at 11:30:40 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site