Skip to main content

Gina McCarthy, EPA
"Can we stop talking about environmental regulations killing jobs?"
For three decades, I've tried to persuade as many people as will listen that the environment and the economy are not separate entities but inextricably entangled with one another. So, Gina McCarthy's speech Tuesday at Harvard Law School gave me something to smile about. As reported by Shira Schoenberg, the newly confirmed administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency made that connection a focal point:
McCarthy [...] said the country must move beyond a discussion about whether there is an inherent conflict between the environment and the economy to understand how climate change and environmental protection fit into a global environmental and economic agenda.

“Our future depends on an economy that moves beyond that dichotomy and recognizes the limitations of the world’s resources are real, the fragility of world’s ecosystems are real, the threats posed by pollution and a changing climate are real,” McCarthy said. “To turn those challenges around, we need a strong, sustainable economy that embraces these issues and behaves in accordance with what we know of science, the environment, technology and public health.”

“Today we need to embrace cutting carbon pollution as a way to spark business innovation,” to create jobs and stimulate the economy, McCarthy said.

McCarthy said the EPA under her guidance will work with various labor and faith communities, state and local governments, and representatives of business in this embrace. “It is about getting everybody to think collaboratively and work together."

Given that much of industry and its marionettes in Congress have done everything possible in the past dozen years—including prolific lying—to obstruct EPA action on climate change, collaboration seems a lofty goal. But McCarthy pointed to the development of stricter CAFE standards for automobiles as a model for getting everyone on board.

Among other things, she said:

• "Climate change will not be resolved overnight. But it will be engaged over the next three years—that I can promise you."

• "Can we stop talking about environmental regulations killing jobs? Please, at least for today. Let's talk about this as an opportunity of a lifetime, because there are too many lifetimes at stake."

• "[New vehicle fuel efficiency standards and brownfields clean-ups] are concrete examples of how EPA is having a substantive positive impact on the lives of everyday people across the U.S., and doing so in way that doesn’t slow the economy but in many ways sparks economic growth.”

• Of drafting regulations on greenhouse gas emissions from existing coal-fired plants—"It is not supposed to be easy. It is supposed to be hard. I don't think it is my job out of the gate to know what the path forward is. It is my obligation to let those voices be heard and listen to them."

• Even though the EPA has called the much-disputed State Department-commissioned environmental impact statement on the Keystone XL "insufficient," it was no surprise that McCarthy did not voice a position on whether the pipeline should be built. “The best EPA can do is continue to be an honest commenter on the environmental impact statement, which we’ve done our best to do. We’ll continue to do that and work with the administration as difficult decisions are made.”

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Tue Jul 30, 2013 at 01:11 PM PDT.

Also republished by Climate Change SOS and Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site